Search

Copyright of Health Policy & Planning is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore and compare treatment decisions and the influence of specific patient characteristics on asthma management in five European countries, and to relate this to existing guidelines.Methods: Using the technique of clinical judgement analysis, doctors in The Netherlands, Norway, Germany, Sweden and the Slovak Republic (40-100 doctors per country) were presented with sets of written simulated cases on asthma treatment. Patient characteristics were varied to determine their influence on the doctors' decisions. Decisions indicating over- and under-prescribing in relation to a gold standard derived from guidelines were also determined.Results: Doctors in The Netherlands prescribed more oral steroid courses and fewer antibiotics than doctors in Norway and Sweden, whereas doctors in Germany and the Slovak Republic prescribed the least oral steroids and the most antibiotics. Partially, this variation could be explained by differences in the underlying propensity to prescribe, but differences in the use of patient characteristics also contributed to the variation. Norwegian doctors were most inclined to increase the maintenance treatment of inhaled corticosteroids, which could best be explained by their relatively high focus on the patient's peak expiratory flow value. Compared with the gold standard, there was 25-56% under-prescribing of oral steroids, and 21-45% over-prescribing of antibiotics.Conclusions: The variation in treatment of asthma patients between doctors in different countries may, in part, be attributed to variations in the underlying propensity to prescribe, and in part to different use of clinical patient characteristics. These findings can be used in tailoring educational programmes to improve treatment practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lessons learned from treating patients with HIV infection can inform care systems for other chronic conditions. For antiretroviral treatment, attending appointments on time correlates with medication adherence; however, HIV clinics in East Africa, where attendance rates vary widely, rarely include systems to schedule appointments or to track missed appointments or patient follow-up. An introduction of low-cost, paper-based patient appointment and tracking systems led to an improvement in timely clinic attendance rates and tracking missing patients. An effective appointment system is critical to managing patients with chronic conditions and can be introduced in resource-limited settings, possibly without having to add staff. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Non-adherence to recommendations for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) is common, but the reasons are not sufficiently understood.Objectives: We aimed to assess and compare the influence of specific patient characteristics on GPs' treatment decisions for UTI in four European countries.Methods: GPs in The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Germany were presented 18-26 case vignettes of UTI. Linear regression models were used to determine which patient characteristics predicted non-optimal decisions.Results: Adherence to national recommendations varied both within and between countries, but there were remarkable similarities in the case characteristics predicting non-optimal decisions: a history of UTI and the patient's age were strongly related to prescription of second-choice antibiotics and longer treatment courses.Conclusion: In all countries many GPs were reluctant to follow the recommendations in UTI cases that they might perceive as being more complicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]