1. The Long and Winding Road: Three-year Mortality Following Prescription of Multidrug Antibiotic Treatment for Mycobacterium avium complex Pulmonary Disease in United States Medicare Beneficiaries With Bronchiectasis.
- Author
-
Varley, Cara D, Ku, Jennifer H, Henkle, Emily, Strnad, Luke, and Winthrop, Kevin L
- Subjects
MYCOBACTERIUM avium ,MEDICARE beneficiaries ,PROPORTIONAL hazards models ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,LUNG diseases - Abstract
Background/Aims Although increased mortality has been reported among people with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), data are limited on survival associated with various antibiotic regimens used to treat MAC-PD. We conducted a comparative analysis of 3-year mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with bronchiectasis using various MAC-PD regimens. Methods We included Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with bronchiectasis (01/2006–12/2014). We limited our cohort to new MAC-PD therapy users. MAC-PD therapy was defined as ≥60-day prescriptions for a macrolide plus ≥1 other MAC-PD antibiotic. Guideline-based therapy (GBT) included a macrolide, ethambutol, and/or rifamycin. Using Cox proportional hazard models, we calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for death up to 3 years after therapy start between the following groups: (1) 2007 GBT versus non-GBT; (2) 2020 GBT versus non-GBT; and (3) macrolide-ethambutol-rifamycin (3-drug) versus macrolide-ethambutol (2-drug). Results We identified 4820 new MAC-PD therapy users, of whom 866 (17.9%) were deceased within 3 years of therapy initiation. Of 3040 (63.1%) beneficiaries prescribed 2007 GBT, 472 (15.5%) were deceased by 3 years, compared to 394 (22.1%) of 1780 (36.9%) prescribed non-GBT (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI],.72–.94). We observed a similar trend for 2020 GBT versus non-GBT (aHR 0.81; 95% CI,.70–.94]). Three-year-mortality was similar between those starting 3-drug versus 2-drug regimens (aHR 0.89; 95% CI,.74–1.08]). Conclusions Among Medicare new MAC-PD therapy users, 3-year-mortality was higher in those prescribed non-GBT regimens compared to GBT regimens. Whether this finding suggests improved efficacy of GBT and/or differential characteristic of those using non-GBT regimens deserves further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF