Search

Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of disease activity–guided dose optimization of TNF inhibitors in RA over 10 years. Methods The study involved an observational long-term extension of a randomized study of participants who completed the 3-year extension of the DRESS-study. After the randomized phase (months 0–18), disease activity–guided dose optimization was allowed for all. The main outcomes were mean time-weighted DAS28-CRP; biologic and targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) use per year, as proportion of daily defined dose; proportion of patients reaching discontinuation; durability and effectiveness of subsequent dose reduction attempts; and radiographic progression between years 3 and 10 using the Sharp–van der Heijde score. Results A total of 170 patients were included, of whom 127 completed the 10-year follow-up. The mean disease activity remained low (DAS28-CRP 2.13, 95% CI 2.10–2.16), while the b/tsDMARD dose reduced from 97% at baseline (95% CI 96–99%, n  = 170) to 56% at year 10 (95% CI 49–63%, n  = 127). Of 161 participants with an optimization attempt, 119 (74%) reached discontinuation with a median duration of 7 months (interquartile range 3–33 months), and 25 participants never had to restart their b/tsDMARD (21%, 95% CI 14–29%). The mean dose reduction after dose optimization was 48% (n  = 159) for the first optimization attempt, and 33% for a subsequent attempt (n  = 86). Of the 86 participants, 41 (48%) had radiographic progression exceeding the smallest detectable change (5.7 units), and progression was associated with disease activity, not b/tsDMARD use. Conclusion Long-term disease activity–guided dose optimization of TNF inhibitors in RA, including discontinuation and multiple tapering attempts, remains safe and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Adalimumab (ADM) therapy is effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but a significant number of IBD patients lose response to ADM. Thus, it is crucial to devise methods to enhance ADM's effectiveness. This study introduces a strategy to predict individual serum concentrations and therapeutic effects to optimize ADM therapy for IBD during the induction phase. Methods We predicted the individual serum concentration and therapeutic effect of ADM during the induction phase based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters calculated using the empirical Bayesian method. We then examined whether the predicted therapeutic effect, defined as clinical remission or treatment failure, matched the observed effect. Results Data were obtained from 11 IBD patients. The therapeutic effect during maintenance therapy was successfully predicted at 40 of 47 time points. Moreover, the predicted effects at each patient's final time point matched the observed effects in 9 of the 11 patients. Conclusion This is the inaugural report predicting the individual serum concentration and therapeutic effect of ADM using the Bayesian method and PK/PD modelling during the induction phase. This strategy may aid in optimizing ADM therapy for IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Up to 40% of PsA patients experience first-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-i) failure. Lower serum drug levels (SDL) have been associated with lower response in autoimmune conditions. This study aimed to: (i) establish the relationship between adalimumab (ADL) and etanercept (ETN) SDL and 3-month response; and (ii) identify optimal non-trough SDL thresholds in PsA. Methods PsA patients commencing ADL or ETN were recruited to the UK observational study OUTPASS. Patients were seen pre-TNF-i and at 3 months when response was measured, and non-trough serum samples collected. Response was defined according to the PsARC or EULAR criteria. Descriptive statistics and concentration-effect curves established differences in SDL based on response. Receiver operating characteristic curves and regression identified optimal SDL thresholds. Results PsA ETN (n  = 97) PsARC and EULAR good responders had significantly higher 3-month SDL compared to non-responders (P  = 0.006 and P  = 0.020, respectively). Non-trough 3-month ETN SDL discriminated PsARC responders from non-responders (AUC = 0.70), with a threshold of 1.8 µg/ml being 63% specific and 69% sensitive. EULAR good and non-/moderate responders were discriminated with an AUC of 0.65 with a threshold of 2.0 µg/ml being 57% specific and 69% sensitive. ADL prescribed (n  = 104) EULAR good responders had significantly higher 3-month SDL (P  = 0.049). Non-trough 3-month ADL SDL discriminated EULAR good and non-/moderate responders (AUC = 0.63) with a threshold of 3.6 µg/ml being 48% specific and 81% sensitive. Conclusion Higher 3-month SDL were detected in responders. Interventions to optimise SDL may improve treatment response earlier. This study suggests 3-month SDL thresholds which may be useful in clinical practice to optimize treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the number of eosinophils increases in the lamina propria of the intestinal tract, but their specific patho-mechanistic role remains unclear. Elevated blood eosinophil counts in active IBD suggest their potential as biomarkers for predicting response to biological therapies. This study evaluates blood eosinophil count trends and their predictive value for clinical response and endoscopic improvement in patients with IBD receiving ustekinumab or adalimumab induction therapy. Methods Participant-level data from phase 3 and 4 clinical trials (UNIFI, SEAVUE, VARSITY) evaluating ustekinumab and adalimumab for moderate–severe Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were used. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined by reductions in disease activity scores. Eosinophil counts were compared between responders and non-responders at multiple time points using t -tests. Logistic regression assessed the odds of achieving a clinical response based on baseline eosinophil counts. Results Among patients treated with ustekinumab for UC, responders had significantly higher baseline eosinophil counts compared to non-responders (0.21 × 109/L vs 0.18 × 109/L, P  = .042). By week 8, responders showed a greater absolute (−0.07 × 109/L vs −0.01 × 109/L, P  < .001) and percent decline (−33.33% vs −5.55%, P  = .027) in eosinophil counts. In CD, ustekinumab responders also had higher baseline eosinophil counts and showed significant reductions by week 8. However, no significant differences in eosinophil counts were observed among CD patients treated with adalimumab or UC patients treated with vedolizumab. Conclusion Eosinophil reduction was identified as a marker for early response to ustekinumab in both UC and CD, but not adalimumab. No difference was observed among UC patients treated with vedolizumab either. Targeting the IL-12/IL-23 pathway may be more effective in managing eosinophil-associated inflammation in IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies are commonly prescribed treatments for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Many patients treated with anti-TNF therapy eventually develop anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Understanding the factors associated with immunogenicity in anti-TNF-treated patients can help guide treatment. The Humira SERENE studies were Phase 3 trials investigating adalimumab induction regimens in CD and UC patients. Methods We imputed alleles for 7 HLA genes in 1100 patients from the SERENE CD and SERENE UC trials. We then tested these alleles for association with time to immunogenicity. Subsequently, we tested loci significantly associated with immunogenicity for their association with patients who had consistently low drug serum concentrations. Results This study replicated the association of HLA-DQA1*05 with time to immunogenicity (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, p  = 2.22E-06). Specifically, HLA-DQA1*05:05 was strongly associated (HR 1.76, p  = 2.02E-10) and we detected a novel association represented by HLA-DRB1*01:02 (HR 3.16, p  = 2.92E-07). Carriage of HLA-DQA1*05:05 and HLA-DRB1*01:02 was associated with patients who experienced consistently low adalimumab trough concentrations (HLA-DQA1*05:05: odds ratio [OR] 1.98, p  = 0.0049; HLA DRB1*01:02: OR 7.06, p  = 7.44E-05). Conclusions We found a significant association between alleles at genes in the human HLA locus and the formation of adalimumab immunogenicity and low adalimumab drug serum concentrations in large clinical studies of CD and UC patients. This work extends previous findings in CD to UC and directly shows a genetic association in patients with low drug concentrations. This work builds on existing literature to suggest that genetic screening could be a useful tool for clinicians concerned with patient anti-TNF immunogenicity. Clinical Trial Registration Numbers SERENE CD (NCT02065570), SERENE UC (NCT02065622). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the impact of baseline RF level on drug concentrations and efficacy of certolizumab pegol [CZP; TNF inhibitor (TNFi) without a crystallizable fragment (Fc)] and adalimumab (ADA; Fc-containing TNFi) in patients with RA. Methods The phase 4 EXXELERATE study (NCT01500278) was a 104-week, randomized, single-blind (double-blind until week 12; investigator-blind thereafter), head-to-head study of CZP vs ADA in patients with RA. In this post hoc analysis, we report drug concentration and efficacy outcomes stratified by baseline RF quartile (≤Q3 or >Q3). Results Baseline data by RF quartiles were available for 453 CZP-randomized and 454 ADA-randomized patients (≤Q3: ≤204 IU/ml; >Q3: >204 IU/ml). From week 12, the area under the curve (AUC) of ADA concentration was lower in patients with RF >204 IU/ml vs patients with RF ≤204 IU/ml; the AUC of CZP concentration was similar in patients with RF ≤204 IU/ml and >204 IU/ml. For patients with RF ≤204 IU/ml, disease activity score (DAS28)-CRP was similar between CZP- and ADA-treated patients through week 104. For patients with RF >204 IU/ml, mean DAS28-CRP was lower in CZP- vs ADA-treated patients at week 104. The proportion of patients with RF >204 IU/ml achieving DAS28-CRP low disease activity at week 104 was greater in CZP- vs ADA-treated patients. Conclusion CZP was associated with maintained drug concentration and efficacy in patients with RA and high RF and may therefore be a more suitable therapeutic option than TNFis with an Fc fragment in these patients. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01500278 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the frequency of simultaneous distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint disease and adjacent nail psoriasis (finger unit) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and compare the efficacy of the IL-17A antagonist ixekizumab (IXE) and the TNF-α inhibitor adalimumab (ADA). Methods This post hoc analysis evaluated the simultaneous occurrence of DIP joint involvement (tenderness and/or swelling) and adjacent nail psoriasis among patients with PsA from the SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) trial comparing IXE to ADA. Among patients with simultaneous DIP joint involvement and adjacent nail psoriasis in ≥1 digit at baseline, treatment effects were assessed through week 52 for each affected finger unit; 'finger unit' defines the connected DIP joint and adjacent nail of an individual digit. Results A total of 354 patients had simultaneous DIP joint involvement and adjacent nail psoriasis in ≥1 finger unit at baseline. Among them, 1309 (IXE: 639; ADA: 670) finger units had baseline DIP joint tenderness and/or swelling and adjacent nail psoriasis. Proportions of affected finger units achieving complete resolution were significantly higher with IXE vs ADA as early as week 12 (38.8% vs 28.4%, P  < 0.0001) and at all post-baseline assessments through week 52 (64.9% vs 57.5%, P  = 0.0055). Conclusion In this study cohort, patients with DIP joint involvement almost always had adjacent nail psoriasis. Greater resolution of DIP joint tenderness, swelling and adjacent nail psoriasis was achieved at all time points over 52 weeks through targeting IL-17A with IXE than TNF-α with ADA, which is noteworthy given prior comparable musculoskeletal outcomes for both drug classes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To characterize the effect of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (UPA15) on enthesitis in patients with PsA from the SELECT-PsA Phase 3 trials. Methods Patients with an inadequate response/intolerance to one or more non-biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 1) or one or more biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 2) received UPA15, adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo (weeks 0–24) switched to UPA15 (week 24 onward). The Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index were used to assess improvement in enthesitis, enthesitis resolution, maintenance of enthesitis resolution and protection from enthesitis development through week 56. Results Data from 639 patients receiving UPA15 and 635 patients receiving placebo (including 317 patients who switched from placebo to UPA15) were analysed. UPA15 led to higher rates of enthesitis resolution vs placebo at week 24 (LEI: 59.8% vs 38.0%; SPARCC index: 50.6% vs 31.5%, respectively) and greater improvements in the LEI (–1.7 vs –1.0) and SPARCC index (–3.4 vs –1.9); improvements were maintained through week 56. Improvements were observed after 12 weeks of UPA15 treatment. Over 90% of patients without enthesitis (LEI = 0) at baseline receiving UPA15 were enthesitis-free at week 56, and UPA15 prevented recurrence of enthesitis at week 56 in >80% of patients with enthesitis at baseline who achieved resolution (LEI = 0) at week 24. Conclusions UPA15 is associated with a comprehensive improvement in enthesitis, with improvements observed after 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, treatment with UPA15 was associated with maintaining an enthesitis-free state after resolution and protection against new-onset enthesitis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03104400 (SELECT-PsA 1) and NCT03104374 (SELECT-PsA 2). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: While biologics have been used for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, there remains to be unknown concerning long-term retention rates. This study aims to present real-world data about long-term retention rates of biologics for the patients with psoriatic arthritis, and to undertake an analysis of the contributing factors. Methods: We examined retention rates and the reasons for discontinuation for biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, secukinumab, and ixekizumab) in 146 prescriptions (of which, 109 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since March 2010. Results: Throughout the entire course of the study, the 10-year retention rates were approximately 70% for adalimumab, 50% for ixekizumab, and 40% for secukinumab. When evaluating retention rates in the biologic-naïve subgroups, the 10-year retention rates were all approximately 70%. Regarding certolizumab pegol, the 3-year retention rate was approximately 75%. For adalimumab, a higher degree of arthritis at the initiation of treatment was found to correlate with an increased likelihood of secondary inefficacy. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy, except for ixekizumab. Conclusions: Each biologic exhibited a favourable long-term retention rate. The main reason for discontinuation was secondary inefficacy. Regarding adalimumab, secondary inefficacy was linked to the extent of arthritis upon treatment initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2024 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. Methods Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2024 were reviewed—including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, endocrine drugs, generics, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2024 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. Results In 2023, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 13.6% compared to 2022, for a total of $722.5 billion. Utilization (a 6.5% increase), new drugs (a 4.2% increase) and price (a 2.9% increase) drove this increase. Semaglutide was the top drug in 2023, followed by adalimumab and apixaban. Drug expenditures were $37.1 billion (a 1.1% decrease) and $135.7 billion (a 15.0% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, increased utilization drove growth, with a small impact from price and new products. In nonfederal hospitals, a drop in utilization led the decrease in expenditures, with price and new drugs modestly contributing to growth in spending. Several new drugs that will influence spending are expected to be approved in 2024. Specialty, endocrine, and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures. Conclusion For 2024, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 10.0% to 12.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate an 11.0% to 13.0% increase and a 0% to 2.0% increase, respectively, compared to 2023. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate if and how the incidence of serious infection (SI) and active tuberculosis (TB) differ among seven biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with RA considering the line of therapy. Methods Patients with RA from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA) cohort who initiated etanercept, certolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab from the first to fifth line of therapy were included. Follow-up extended up to 3 years. The primary outcome was SI and the secondary outcome was TB. Event rates were calculated and compared using Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. Comparisons were made overall and stratified by line of therapy. Sensitivity analysis was restricted to all treatment courses from 2009 (tocilizumab availability) until the end of the study (2018). Results Among 33 897 treatment courses (62 513 patient-years) the incidence of SI was 4.4/100 patient-years (95% CI 4.2, 4.5). After adjustment, hazards ratios (HRs) of SI were slightly higher with adalimumab and infliximab compared with etanercept. However, no clear pattern was observed when stratifying by line of therapy in terms of incidence rate or HR. Sensitivity analyses showed similar HRs among these treatments. Regarding TB, all 49 cases occurred during the first three lines of treatment and rarely since 2009. Conclusion The risk of serious infections does not appear to be influenced by the line of therapy in patients with RA. However, the risk of TB seems to be more frequent during the initial lines of treatment or prior to 2009. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To explore associations between serum adalimumab level, treatment response and drug survival in order to identify optimal drug levels for therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab. Also, to assess the occurrence and risk factors of anti-drug antibody (ADAb) formation. Methods Non-trough adalimumab and ADAb levels were measured by automated fluorescence assays in serum collected after 3 months of adalimumab treatment in patients with RA, PsA or axial SpA (axSpA) included in the observational NOR-DMARD study. Treatment response was evaluated after 3 months and drug survival was evaluated during long-term follow-up. Results In 340 patients (97 RA, 69 PsA, 174 axSpA), the median adalimumab level was 7.3 mg/l (interquartile range 4.0–10.3). A total of 33 (10%) patients developed ADAbs. Findings were comparable across diagnoses. In RA and PsA, adalimumab levels ≥6.0 mg/l were associated with treatment response [odds ratio (OR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.0, 4.4)] and improved drug survival [hazard ratio 0.49 (95% CI 0.27, 0.80)]. In axSpA, a therapeutic level could not be identified, but higher adalimumab levels were associated with response. Factors associated with ADAb formation were previous bDMARD use, no methotrexate comedication and the use of adalimumab originator compared with GP2017. Conclusion Higher adalimumab levels were associated with a better response and improved drug survival for all diagnoses, with a suggested lower threshold of 6.0 mg/l for RA/PsA. This finding, the large variability in drug levels among patients receiving standard adalimumab dose and the high proportion of patients developing ADAbs encourages further investigations into the potential role of therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the case of a pediatric patient with mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) caused by homozygous mutation in the MVK gene. Topics discussed include the patient's development of very early-onset, recurrent episodes and life-threatening colitis, the results of genetic testing and colonoscopic biopsy, and the management of the patient through combination therapy targeting interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) vs tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). Methods This was a randomized, controlled, open-label study. Forty patients with active and severe TAK were enrolled. They were treated with ADA (n  = 21) combined with glucocorticoids (GCs) and MTX or TCZ (n  = 19) combined with GCs and MTX. The planned follow-up duration was 12 months. The primary end point was the efficacy rate (ER) at 6 months. The secondary end points included ER at 9 and 12 months, relapse rate, GC tapering, adverse effects, and life quality changes during treatment. Results In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the ER at 6 months was higher in the ADA group (85.71% vs 52.63%, P  = 0.02). A similar direction of effect was noted in the per-protocol set (89.47% vs 62.50%, P  = 0.06). The percentages of patients who achieved a GC dose of ≤10 mg/day at 6 months were similar between the ADA and TCZ groups (47.37% vs 43.75%, P  = 0.83). The ERs at 9 and 12 months were similar between the two groups (P  > 0.05). During the first 12 months of treatment, the relapse rate and adverse event incidence were comparable between the two groups (ADA vs TCZ: 9.52% vs 10.53%, P  = 0.96; 38.10% vs 47.37%, P  = 0.55, respectively). Conclusion ADA combined with GCs and MTX may be more efficacious than TCZ combined with GCs and MTX among patients with active and severe TAK. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04300686. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Biologic therapy is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However due to cost and safety concerns, dose de-escalation strategies after achieving remission have been suggested. Aim To critically review available data on dose de-escalation of biologics [or other advanced therapies] in IBD. We will focus on studies evaluating de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially optimised, and also on studies assessing de-escalation from standard dosing. Methods A systematic bibliographic search was performed. Results The mean frequency of de-escalation after previous dose intensification [12 studies, 1,474 patients] was 34%. The corresponding frequency of de-escalation from standard dosing [five studies, 3,842 patients] was 4.2%. The relapse rate of IBD following anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially dose-escalated [10 studies, 301 patients] was 30%. The corresponding relapse rate following anti-TNF de-escalation from standard dosing [nine studies, 494 patients] was 38%. The risk of relapse was lower for patients in clinical, biologic, and endoscopic/radiological remission at the time of de-escalation. A role of anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring in the decision to dose de-escalate has been demonstrated. In patients relapsing after de-escalation, re-escalation is generally effective. De-escalation is not consistently associated with a better safety profile. The cost-effectiveness of the de-escalation strategy remains uncertain. Finally, there is not enough evidence to recommend dose de-escalation of biologics different from anti-TNFs or small molecules. Conclusions Any consideration for de-escalation of biologic therapy in IBD must be tailored, taking into account the risks and consequences of a flare and patients' preferences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially lethal complication that leads to increased hospitalization, disability and mortality. Furthermore, the risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in RA. We evaluated whether DMARD treatment is associated with incident AF in patients with seropositive RA (SPRA). Methods The South Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database was used to identify patients newly diagnosed with SPRA between 2010 and 2020. A nested case-control analysis was performed to match AF-affected patients to unaffected controls for age, sex, follow-up duration, and index year of SPRA diagnosis at a 1:4 ratio. Adjusted conditional logistic regression was used to identify the predictive factors for AF. Results Of the 108 085 patients with SPRA, 2,629 (2.4%) developed new-onset AF, and the proportion of females was ∼67%. In the matched population, pre-existing comorbidities of hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure were associated with increased risk of AF. Meanwhile, the use of methotrexate (MTX) decreased the risk of incident AF [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.89], whereas the use of leflunomide (LEF) increased AF (aOR, 1.21). In a subgroup of patients aged ≥50 years, LEF and adalimumab increased the occurrence of AF, while MTX decreased AF in males and LEF increased this risk in females. Conclusion Although the number of subjects developing new-onset AF was small, MTX decreased and LEF increased incident AF in patients with RA. Especially, a distinct pattern of AF risk with DMARDs usage was observed according to age and sex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Home self-injection of the human anti-tumour necrosis alpha [anti-TNFα] monoclonal adalimumab complicates prospective serial-sampling studies. Although a recent study examined adalimumab levels and immunogenicity in Crohn's disease [CD] patients, prospective real-world data from ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are lacking. Methods A three-monthly home-visit programme from induction was established prospectively for UC patients. Clinical scores were determined at each visit, and sera were obtained for assessment of drug and anti-adalimumab antibody levels. Calprotectin was measured using a smartphone-based app. This cohort was compared to a parallel prospective cohort of adalimumab-treated CD patients [POETIC1]. Results Fifty UC patients starting adalimumab [median follow-up 28 weeks] were compared to 98 adalimumab-treated CD patients [median follow-up 44 weeks]. Only 11/50 UC patients [22%] continued treatment to the end of the follow-up compared with 50/98 [51%] CD patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27, p  = 0.001). Loss of response was significantly more common in UC patients [OR = 3.2, p  = 0.001]. Seventeen patients [34%] in the UC cohort developed anti-adalimumab antibodies, 9/17 [52.9%] as early as week 2. There was no difference between patient cohorts in the overall development of anti-adalimumab antibodies [34% vs 30.6%, respectively, OR = 1.67, p  = 0.67], nor was there a difference in early immunogenicity [OR = 1.39, p  = 0.35]. There was no difference in low drug levels [<3 µg/mL] between the two cohorts [OR = 0.87, p  = 0.83]. Conclusions Loss of response to adalimumab therapy was significantly more common in the UC compared to the CD cohort and was driven by a higher rate of non-immunogenic, pharmacodynamic parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We postulated that adalimumab [ADA] drug clearance [CL] may be a more critical determinant of therapeutic outcome than ADA concentration. This was tested in Crohn's disease [CD] patients undergoing ADA maintenance treatment. Methods CD patients from four cohorts received ADA induction and started maintenance therapy. Therapeutic outcomes consisted of endoscopic remission [ER], sustained C-reactive protein [CRP] based clinical remission [defined as CRP levels below 3 mg/L in the absence of symptoms], and faecal calprotectin [FC] level below 100 µg/g. Serum albumin, ADA concentration, and anti-drug antibody status were determined using immunochemistry and homogeneous mobility shift assay, respectively. CL was determined using a nonlinear mixed effect model with Bayesian priors. Statistical analysis consisted of Mann–Whitney test and logistic regression with calculation of odds ratio. Repeated event analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed effect model. Results In 237 enrolled patients [median age 40 years, 45% females], median CL was lower in patients achieving ER as compared with those with persistent active endoscopic disease [median 0.247 L/day vs 0.326 L/day, respectively] [ p  <0.01]. There was no significant difference in ADA concentration between patients in endoscopic remission compared with those with recurrence [median 9.3 µg/mL vs 11.7 µg/mL, respectively]. Sustained CRP-based clinical remission and FC levels below 100 µg/g were generally associated with lower CL and higher ADA concentration. Repeated event analysis confirmed those findings with better performances of CL than concentration in associating with ER and other outcomes. Conclusion Lower ADA clearance is associated with an improved clinical outcome for patients with Crohn's disease and may be a superior pharmacokinetic measure than concentration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibition is a core therapeutic avenue for a broad range of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, as well as dermatological conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa. Adalimumab has become one of the most common TNF-alpha–inhibiting agents, which is used for many of these conditions. Treatment with such agents is associated with numerous systemic side effects, though cardiac complications remain relatively rare. These include reports of pericarditis and pericardial effusions 1–3 . Case summary A 63-year-old lady was referred to the outpatient respiratory clinic with a 1-year history of increasing breathlessness, on a background of 4 years of treatment with adalimumab for Stage III hidradenitis suppurativa. A high-resolution computed tomography (CT) thorax revealed evidence of pericardial calcification. Subsequent left and right heart catheterization study revealed equalization of intraventricular pressures, consistent with constrictive pericarditis. A QuantiFERON test was negative, and rheumatological serology was unremarkable. The patient was initially managed conservatively with close follow-up, before undergoing surgical pericardectomy when she developed signs of cardiac failure. Discussion Adalimumab is associated with a range of systemic side effects, though cardiac complications are relatively rare. This case highlights a potentially novel complication associated with prolonged adalimumab therapy. Given that there are reports in the literature of pericarditis and pericardial effusions associated with TNF-alpha inhibition 1–3 , it is reasonable to hypothesize that the calcific constrictive pericarditis seen in this case may demonstrate a novel cardiac phenomenon associated with this therapy, given the lack of any traditional aetiological factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To evaluate enthesitis treatment response, including time to resolution and data from multiple enthesitis instruments, in patients with PsA treated with secukinumab or adalimumab for 52 weeks. Methods In this post hoc analysis of the EXCEED study, patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg or adalimumab 40 mg per the label were grouped by presence or absence of baseline enthesitis based on the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index (SPARCC). Efficacy was assessed according to several enthesitis-related instruments using non-responder imputation for the achievement of enthesitis resolution (LEI/SPARCC = 0), Kaplan–Meier analysis for time to resolution, and as-observed data for other outcomes. Results Enthesitis was present at baseline in 498 of 851 patients (58.5%) as assessed by LEI and in 632 of 853 patients (74.1%) as assessed by SPARCC. Patients with baseline enthesitis generally presented with greater disease activity. Similar proportions of patients receiving secukinumab or adalimumab achieved resolution of LEI and SPARCC at weeks 24 (secukinumab: LEI/SPARCC, 49.6%/45.8%; adalimumab: LEI/SPARCC, 43.6%/43.5%) and 52 (secukinumab: LEI/SPARCC, 60.7%/53.2%; adalimumab: LEI/SPARCC, 55.3%/51.4%), with comparable mean time to enthesitis resolution. Improvements were similar for both drugs at individual enthesitis sites. Resolution of enthesitis with secukinumab or adalimumab was associated with improvements in quality of life at week 52. Conclusion Secukinumab and adalimumab showed similar efficacy, including time to resolution, with respect to resolution of enthesitis. Inhibition of IL-17 with secukinumab reduced clinical enthesitis similarly to TNF-α inhibition. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02745080 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In this nationwide study we aimed to compare the durability of the first initiated biologic in Crohn's disease [CD], stratified by monotherapy and combotherapy. Methods We used data from the epi-IIRN cohort, which includes 98% of the Israeli inflammatory bowel disease population [2005–2020]. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery or added medications [except for combination therapy with thiopurines or methotrexate]. All comparisons were based on stringent propensity-score matching and paired time-to-event analyses. Results A total of 19 264 patients with CD were included, of whom 7452 [39%] received biologics with a median follow-up of 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6–10.7). Time to biologics decreased gradually from 6.7 years [IQR 2.7–10.4] in 2005 to 0.2 years [0.07–0.23] in 2020. The durability of the first biologic after 1 and 3 years was higher with adalimumab monotherapy [88%/61%] than vedolizumab monotherapy [81%/59%; n  = 394 matched patients, p  = 0.04] and similar between infliximab monotherapy and vedolizumab monotherapy [65%/43%; n  = 182 matched patients, p  = 0.1]. Durability was higher in adalimumab monotherapy vs infliximab monotherapy [83%/62% vs 71%/48% at 1/3 years; p  <0.001] and it was similar in adalimumab monotherapy vs infliximab combotherapy [87%/63% vs 80%/58%, respectively; p  = 0.1]. Durability was higher in combotherapy compared with monotherapy for both infliximab [85%/64% vs 67%/43%, respectively; n  = 496 matched pairs, p  <0.001], and adalimumab [93%/76% vs 82%/62%, respectively; n  = 540 matched pairs, p  <0.001]. Conclusion Durability of the first biologic in CD was highest for adalimumab monotherapy. Combotherapy further increased the durability of adalimumab and infliximab. Unless otherwise indicated, our data may support using anti-tumour necrosis factors [TNFs] as first-line biologics in CD, particularly adalimumab if monotherapy is advised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between self-reported non-adherence, non-trough drug levels, immunogenicity and conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) co-therapy in TNF inhibitor (TNF-i) drug response in PsA. Methods Serum samples and adherence questionnaires were collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months for PsA patients prescribed TNF-i. Non-trough adalimumab (ADL) and etanercept (ETN) drug levels were measured at 3 and 6 months using commercially available ELISAs. Clinical response was assessed using PsA response criteria (PsARC) and change in 28-joint DAS (ΔDAS28) between baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months. Results In 244 PsA patients (52.5% ADL and 47.5% ETN), self-reported non-adherence was associated with PsARC non-response over 12 months using generalized estimating equation (GEE) modelling (P  = 0.037). However, there was no significant difference between non-trough ADL or ETN drug levels based on self-reported non-adherence. Higher ETN levels at 3 months were associated with PsARC response at 3 (P  = 0.015), 6 (P  = 0.037) and 12 months (P  = 0.015) and over 12 months using GEE modelling (P  = 0.026). Increased ADL drug levels at 3 months were associated with greater ΔDAS28 at 3 months (P  = 0.019). ADL anti-drug antibody-positive status was significantly associated with lower 3- and 6-month ADL levels (P  < 0.001) and ΔDAS28 and PsARC response at 3, 6 and 12 months. Meanwhile, MTX co-therapy was associated with a reduction in immunogenicity at 3 and 6 months (P  = 0.008 and P  = 0.024). Conclusion Although both were associated with reduced response, the objectively measured non-trough drug levels showed more significant associations with drug response than self-reported non-adherence measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical characteristics, predictive factors, and practical algorithms of paradoxical reactions (PRs), specifically paradoxical psoriasis (PP). Methods The TReasure database is a web-based prospective observational cohort comprised of patients with RA and SpA from 17 centres around Turkey since 2017. A cohort study and a case–control study nestled within the cohort were identified. Results In total, 2867 RA and 5316 SpA patients were evaluated. The first biologic agent was found to have caused PRs in 60% of the 136 patients (1.66%) who developed the PRs. The median time interval between the PRs and biological onset was 12 months (range 1–132 months, mean 21 months). The most common types of PP, constituting 92.6% of PRs, were pustular (60.3%) and palmoplantar (30.9%). Adalimumab (30.9%), infliximab (19%) and etanercept (17.4%) were the most common agents causing the PP. In the treatment of most PP patients (73.2%), switching biologic agents was favoured, with TNF inhibitor (TNFi) chosen in 46.03% and non-TNFi in 26.9% of cases. The three most frequently selected drugs were etanercept (24.6%), secukinumab (9.5%) and adalimumab (8.7%). Only 5.17% of patients who switched to another TNFi showed progression. The odds ratios (s) for SSZ, HCQ, and LEF use were significantly higher in RA controls than in PP patients (P  = 0.033, OR = 0.15; P  = 0.012, OR = 0.15; and P  = 0.015, OR = 0.13, respectively). In the PP group with SpA, the number of smokers was significantly higher (P  = 0.003, OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.81). Conclusion Contrary to expectations based on earlier research suggesting that paradoxical reactions develop with the class effect of biological agents, the response of patients who were shifted to another TNFi was favourable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a Danish nationwide cohort study on the long-term drug survival of biologics in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic inflammatory skin disease. The study analyzed data from 452 patients who were treated with various biologics between 2005 and 2021. The results showed that the median drug survival time for adalimumab was approximately 8 months, with bio-naïve patients having a significantly longer drug survival time compared to non-naïve patients. The study also reported real-life drug survival data on secukinumab in HS. The findings suggest the need for further research into more effective biologics for HS. [Extracted from the article]

A study published in the British Journal of Dermatology examined the use of deucravacitinib as an additional therapy for patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who did not respond well to monotherapy. The study included 20 patients who were already on biologic therapy for more than 6 months. The results showed that combining deucravacitinib with biologic therapy had an additive effect in reducing symptoms of refractory psoriasis. However, the results for PsA were mixed, with some patients experiencing improvement and others seeing little change. The study suggests that dual therapy may be a potential treatment option, but acknowledges the need for further research with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Aims We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. Design We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels. Results We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [ n  = 113] and control [ n  = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: −0.017, 95% confidence interval [−0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (−€943, [−€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (−€2545, [−€2780; −€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost–utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [−€2099; €2050], €69 [−€2908; €1965] and −€455 [−€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective. Conclusion When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission. Clinical Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT03172377. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody developed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), used for the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Immunogenicity to this drug may lead to therapeutic failure. Various laboratory assays are used for measuring serum adalimumab and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to adalimumab, for therapeutic monitoring and evaluation of clinical non-responsiveness. This study compared the performance of 2 clinical assays used by different reference laboratories. Methods: In total, 120 residual clinical samples were tested at both laboratories. A sandwich ELISA for adalimumab detecting free drug and a bridging ELISA capable of detecting both free and bound ADA were performed at the Mayo Clinic. A functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) was used at ARUP Laboratories for measuring bioactive serum drug concentrations, and neutralizing ADA. Results: Seventy-eight samples had measurable concentrations of adalimumab by both methods and yielded a correlation coefficient r = 0.93, slope = 0.886, and intercept = 0.950. Overall agreement of 92.5% was observed between the assays, with most discrepant drug results being attributed to a higher positivity rate with ELISA (8/9). One outlier positive with RGA and negative with ELISA was confirmed by LC-MS/MS to be attributed to infliximab. Overall agreement of 79.2% was observed between the ADA assays. Differences in ADA results may be due to the bridging ELISA detecting total ADA (free, drug-bound, neutralizing, and non-neutralizing), while RGA detects free, neutralizing ADA only. Conclusions: Although the assays are fundamentally different, the results show significant concordance between the clinically validated tests performed in different laboratories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify amino acids that play important roles in the structural stability of Fab, seven phenylalanine residues in the Fab constant region of the therapeutic antibody adalimumab were subjected to alanine mutagenesis. Six Fab mutants, H:F130A, H:F154A, H:F174A, L:F118A, L:F139A and L:F209A, showed decreased thermostability compared with wild-type Fab. In contrast, the T m for the L:F116A mutant was 1.7°C higher than that of wild-type Fab, indicating that the F116 residue was unfavorable for Fab thermostability. Six proline mutants, H:P131G, H:P155G, H:P175G, L:P119G, L:P120G and L:P141G, were also prepared to investigate the effect of proline residues adjacent to mutated phenylalanine residues. The thermostability of the H:P155G and L:P141G mutants in particular was significantly reduced, with decreases in T m of 5.0 and 3.0°C, respectively, compared with wild-type Fab. The H:P155 and L:P141 residues have a cis conformation, whereas the other mutated proline residues have a trans conformation. H:P155 and L:P141 had stacking interactions with the H:F154 and L:Y140, respectively, at the interface between the variable and constant regions. It is suggested that the interactions of the aromatic ring with a cis -form proline at the interface between the variable and constant regions is important for stability of Fab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The impact of the market entry of adalimumab biosimilars on clinical practices and specialty pharmacies is explained. A roadmap is also provided for how pharmacists can successfully navigate this landscape. Summary Biosimilars have previously been introduced as a mechanism to help curb biologic expenditures, with biosimilars undergoing an abbreviated regulatory approval process that focuses on biosimilarity and generating product competition. Adalimumab is currently the leading product in the biologics market, generating approximately $20 to $30 billion in sales worldwide consecutively from 2019 to 2021. Many adalimumab biosimilars are slated to enter the market in 2023 and become available for patient use. However, compared to other biosimilars, adalimumab biosimilars have several unique considerations, such as interchangeability and concentration, that will impact pharmacy practices and workflows. Because pharmacists embedded in clinical practices and specialty pharmacies will be significantly involved in the processes relating to adalimumab biosimilar implementation, adoption, and use, a primer on understanding the various adalimumab biosimilar products available and considerations surrounding these products with regard to workflow and patient use is critical. Several resources are also provided to help pharmacists successfully navigate the adalimumab biosimilar landscape. Conclusion The biosimilar landscape continues to evolve, and 2023 will see the launch of several adalimumab biosimilar products, which vary with regard to formulation, concentration, and interchangeability status. Pharmacists are well positioned to educate providers and patients about this landscape and help implement an efficient workflow to support adalimumab biosimilar adoption and use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Different antibiotic classes were reported to have variable effects on immunogenicity towards anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents. However, the impact of antibiotic administration on biologic treatment durability was not investigated. We aimed to assess the association between antibiotic treatment and persistence of different classes of biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients. Methods Data from the epi-IIRN, a nationwide registry of all Israeli IBD patients were analysed. All patients who filled a prescription of either infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, were included. Treatment cessation was defined as drug discontinuation of at least 6 months. Macrolides, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors were selected as primary exposure variables. Survival analysis was performed using marginal structural models for each drug separately. Results In all 13 513 IBD patients, with a total of 39 600 patient-years, were included. Significant differences of overall treatment persistence were demonstrated, with highest persistence rates for ustekinumab and the lowest for infliximab treatment. Macrolides were found to be significantly associated with reduced risk of infliximab cessation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.89]. Fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins were associated with an elevated risk of adalimumab treatment cessation [aHR 1.33, 95% CI 1.22-1.46; and aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.34, respectively]. No significant effects of the studied antibiotics were observed in ustekinumab and vedolizumab users. Conclusions Specific antibiotic classes are associated with duration of anti-TNF treatment, but not with durability of vedolizumab or ustekinumab treatments. Further research is required to study the effect of specific antibiotics on response to biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Septic arthritis (SA) is a serious complication occurring in the joints, and its risk increases with immunosuppressive therapy. This study investigated whether TNF inhibitors increase the risk of SA in patients with AS and seropositive RA (SPRA). Methods We searched the South Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database for incident cases of AS and SPRA between 2010 and 2020. SA was defined using the diagnostic code M00 and hospital admission. Cox-proportional hazards analysis was conducted to compare the incidence of SA according to TNF inhibitor (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab/golimumab) use during follow-up. Results Of the 145 129 patients analysed, 1170 (0.8%) developed SA during the follow-up period. Older age; male sex; SPRA diagnosis; comorbidities of hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic pulmonary disease (CPD); and infliximab and etanercept use increased the incidence of SA in the overall population. However, in patients with AS, only age and renal disease were predictors of SA, and TNF inhibitors did not increase the incidence of SA. Meanwhile, patients with SPRA treated with TNF inhibitors were prone to SA regardless of TNF inhibitor type, and age, HTN, DM and CPD were associated with SA. The incidence of SA was prominent after the first year of commencing TNF inhibitor therapy, for both AS and SPRA. Conclusion TNF inhibitors increase the incidence of SA, specifically in patients with SPRA, but not AS. Importantly, age, comorbidities and the early time period after starting TNF inhibitors were associated with SA, which should be considered simultaneously when initiating TNF inhibitor therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2023 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. Methods Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2023 were reviewed, including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, diabetes medications, generics, COVID-19 pandemic influence, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2023 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. Results In 2022, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 9.4% compared to 2021, for a total of $633.5 billion. Utilization (a 5.9% increase), price (a 1.7% increase) and new drugs (a 1.8% increase) drove this increase. Adalimumab was the top-selling drug in 2022, followed by semaglutide and apixaban. Drug expenditures were $37.2 billion (a 5.9% decrease) and $116.9 billion (a 10.4% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, new products and increased utilization growth drove growth, with a small impact from price changes. In nonfederal hospitals, a drop in utilization led to a decrease in expenditures, with price changes and new drugs contributing to growth in spending. Several new drugs that will influence spending have been or are expected to be approved in 2023. Specialty and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures along with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion For 2023, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 6.0% to 8.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 8.0% to 10.0% and 1.0% to 3.0%, respectively, compared to 2022. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any particular health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Following patent expiry of the originator biologics, TNFi biosimilars became available, presenting the opportunity for significant reductions in drug costs. Objectives To describe the uptake of TNFi biosimilars for psoriasis treatment in the UK and Ireland. Methods This observational cohort study utilizes data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a national pharmacovigilance study register for patients with psoriasis on systemic treatments. We analysed biosimilar uptake trends over time in nine geographical regions of England along with Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. We assessed the incidence of switching to biosimilars in an originator-user cohort (switchers). Patients on originators infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab at the time originator patents expired, entered the cohort on 1 February 2015, August 2015 and October 2018, respectively, and were followed up until 31 October 2021. Trends in biosimilar initiations were assessed in an adalimumab-naïve cohort who started adalimumab between 1 October 2018 and 31 July 2019 (starters). We assessed the associations between patient factors and originator-to-biosimilar switching and biosimilar initiation using a multivariable Cox regression model and a multivariable logistic regression model, respectively. Results Included in the originator-user cohort were 4202 patients (209 on infliximab, 742 on etanercept and 3251 on adalimumab). For infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, respectively, the cumulative incidence of originator-to-biosimilar switching increased with time to 14.8%, 23.6% and 66.6% after 3 years. Across geographical regions, 3-year switching rates varied from 0% to 43.7% for infliximab; from 0% to 40.4% for etanercept; and from 12.5% to 84.3% for adalimumab. Out of the 528 patients included in the adalimumab-naïve cohort, 67.8% started on biosimilars. Originator-to-biosimilar switching and biosimilar initiation were more common in men and in patients who had lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at cohort entry. Conclusions The uptake of biosimilars increased over time and varied considerably across the UK and Ireland; adalimumab had the highest biosimilar uptake rate compared with that of other TNFi drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Evaluating histological outcomes in ulcerative colitis [UC] has become common in recent clinical trials. In this study, we explored the additional value of the combined endpoint of histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement [HEMI] compared with endoscopic improvement [EI] at post-induction [Week 14] and post-maintenance [1 year]. Methods This post hoc analysis included 620 UC participants with available data from the VARSITY trial. Participants achieving post-induction and post-maintenance HEMI [Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1 and Geboes score <3.2] were compared across clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes [PROs], and inflammatory markers. Univariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with the outcome of interest. Multivariate analyses included covariates with a p  <0.05 on univariate analyses. Results Among the 468 patients with 1-year data available, a total of 166 [35.5%] attained HEMI and 209 [44.7%] attained EI at post-induction. No difference in achievement of clinical remission [CR] at 1 year was observed among those who attained post-induction HEMI vs EI (121/166 [72.9%] vs 147/209 [70.3%], p  = 0.903). Similar findings were observed for the outcome of 1-year treatment failure (45/166 [27.1%] vs 55/209 [26.3%], p  = 0.781). Patients who achieved HEMI at post-induction had lower total and partial Mayo scores and had the largest improvement from baseline. Faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein [CRP] were also significantly lower among HEMI achievers at post-induction [ p  <0.001]. Similar findings were observed at post-maintenance. Conclusions In this post hoc analysis, at post-induction, HEMI did not demonstrate additional prognostic value in predicting 1-year outcomes over EI. However, HEMI was associated with lower clinical disease activity at post-induction and at 1 year compared with endoscopic or histological outcomes in isolation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the impact of additionally given MTX on biologic treatment of polyarticular JIA in terms of effectiveness, safety and drug survival. Methods Patients suffering from polyarticular JIA and treated with either monotherapy with a first biologic or a combination of a biologic and MTX were selected from the BIKER registry. The TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi) adalimumab, etanercept and golimumab and the IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab were considered. Upon a non-randomized study design, we adjusted the different cohorts using propensity score matching to improve comparability. Results A total of 2148 patients entered the analysis, who were treated by either combination therapy (n  = 1464) or monotherapy (n  = 684). Disease activity declined significantly more in patients upon combination therapy than upon biologic monotherapy. Comparison of adjusted cohorts revealed that patients who received TNFi gained more benefit from additionally given MTX than patients treated with tocilizumab. Median survival time of therapy with biologics was significantly longer upon combination therapy (3.1 years) than with monotherapy (2.7 years), as demonstrated by a Kaplan–Meier analysis (log rank test: P  = 0.002). The safety profile was moderately affected by additional MTX due to increased incidence of gastrointestinal and hepatic adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred at an equal rate of 3.6 events per 100 patient-years in both cohorts. Conclusion Additionally given MTX improves the effectiveness of biologic treatment in polyarticular JIA without seriously compromising treatment safety. Especially TNFi benefit from combination, while no improvement in outcome has been observed by combining tocilizumab with MTX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Interventions aimed at increasing TNF-α inhibitor serum drug levels (SDLs) may improve treatment response; however, previous studies suggesting SDL cut-offs have not accounted for treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between adalimumab/certolizumab SDLs and EULAR good vs non-/moderate response and to define SDL cut-offs associated with good response in fully adherent patients. Methods In a prospective observational study, 475 patients with RA were treated with certolizumab (n  = 192) or adalimumab (n  = 283). At baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months, patients had 28-joint DAS, self-reported treatment adherence and SDLs measured. Fully adherent patients were analysed as a subgroup. Follow-up data at 3, 6 and 12 months were analysed separately. Median SDLs were compared in good vs non-/moderate response patients and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to establish cut-off SDLs. Results Fully adherent good responders had significantly higher median adalimumab/certolizumab SDLs compared with non-/moderate responders (P  = 0.04 and P  = 0.0005, respectively). ROC analysis reported 3 month non-trough adalimumab SDLs discriminated good vs non-/moderate response with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63 (95% CI 0.52, 0.75), with a cut-off of 7.5 mg/l being 39.1% specific and 80.9% sensitive. Similarly, 3 month non-trough certolizumab SDLs discriminated good vs non-/moderate response with an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.51, 0.78), with a cut-off of 26.0 mg/l being 43.9% specific and 77.8% sensitive. Conclusion In fully adherent patients, higher SDLs are detected in good responders, suggesting that interventions to improve SDLs, such as encouraging adherence, could improve treatment response. The 3 month non-trough SDL cut-offs of 7.5 mg/l for adalimumab and 26.0 mg/l for certolizumab may be useful in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article comments on a study which examined the connection between the clinical components in the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint synovio-entheseal complex and subsequent response to ixekizumab (IXE) or adalimumab (ADA) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). It points out the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of IXE in clearing psoriasis and its benefit over the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor ADA in achieving complete resolution of DIP joint tenderness, DIP joint swelling and nail psoriasis.

Objectives Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response. Methods Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg. Per protocol, patients with <20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts (weeks 14, 18, 22) or failure to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at week 26 were blindly switched from upadacitinib to adalimumab or vice versa. Treatment outcomes, including clinical remission/LDA, physical function, pain and a novel combined endpoint for deep response, were evaluated through 48 weeks and corresponding time-averaged response rates determined. Data were analysed by initial randomized group regardless of any subsequent switch in therapy. Results This post hoc analysis included 651 patients initially randomized to upadacitinib (of whom 252 switched to adalimumab) and 327 patients initially randomized to adalimumab (of whom 159 switched to upadacitinib). At week 48, patients randomized to either therapy demonstrated similar achievement of most treatment endpoints. Greater improvements in the total time spent in a lower disease state were observed for initial upadacitinib vs initial adalimumab therapy across most clinical and patient-reported outcomes through 48 weeks, and the median time to DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 occurred 6–8 weeks earlier among those randomized to upadacitinib. Conclusion Following a modified treat-to-target strategy, rates of CDAI remission/LDA and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 at 48 weeks were similar, regardless of starting therapy. However, patients initially receiving upadacitinib reached treatment targets more quickly and spent more time in clinical targets over the initial 48 weeks of treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02629159 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Discontinuation of biologics is common among patients with psoriasis due to treatment failure or adverse events. To achieve improvements in disease management, patients and clinicians may choose to switch biologics. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching to bimekizumab from adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab. Methods Data are reported for up to 80 weeks after patients switched to bimekizumab from adalimumab at week 24 in BE SURE, ustekinumab at week 52 in BE VIVID [upon entry into the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (OLE)] and secukinumab at week 48 in BE RADIANT (upon entry into the BE RADIANT OLE). Efficacy outcomes are reported by number of weeks after switching to bimekizumab and were split based on whether patients had achieved a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at the time of switch. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported using exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years. Trial registration: BE SURE (NCT03412747), BE VIVID (NCT03370133), BE BRIGHT (NCT03598790), BE RADIANT (NCT03536884). Results Rapid and durable improvements in clinical responses and benefits in health-related quality of life were observed among PASI 90 nonresponders who switched to bimekizumab. Most PASI 90 nonresponders achieved PASI 90 4 weeks after switching to bimekizumab from adalimumab (67%), ustekinumab (79%) and secukinumab (53%). After 48 weeks of bimekizumab, 91%, 90% and 79% of PASI 90 nonresponders had achieved PASI 90 after switching from adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab, respectively. Durable improvements were also observed for PASI 100, Investigator's Global Assessment score 0/1, body surface area affected by psoriasis ≤ 1%, absolute PASI ≤ 2, and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1. Among PASI 90 responders, existing treatment responses were maintained or improved after switching to bimekizumab. The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate. EAIRs were generally similar between active-comparator treatment periods and after switching to bimekizumab. EAIRs typically decreased with a longer duration of bimekizumab exposure. Conclusions High proportions of patients who did not adequately respond to adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab achieved high levels of skin clearance after switching to bimekizumab. Bimekizumab was well tolerated and there were no new safety findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a correction to: Hans Christian Ring et al., Long-term drug survival of adalimumab, infliximab, secukinumab and ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: a Danish nationwide cohort study, British Journal of Dermatology, Volume 190, Issue 5, May 2024, Pages 769–771, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae042This research letter has been amended to clarify that further supplementary information is available upon request to the corresponding author. [Extracted from the article]

Treatment of psoriasis with adalimumab has been associated with weight gain; however, data are sparse. We conducted a cohort study in Danish patients with psoriasis treated with adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab. After 1 year of treatment, we found no significant weight gain and the three treatments were comparable with regards to change in bodyweight. Therefore, our study does not support that adalimumab results in weight gain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The positioning of secukinumab in the treatment of axial SpA (axSpA) and PsA is debated, partly due to a limited understanding of the comparative safety of the available treatments. We aimed to assess the risk of the key safety outcome infections during treatment with secukinumab and TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Methods Patients with SpA and PsA starting secukinumab or TNFi year 2015 through 2018 were identified in four Nordic rheumatology registers. The first hospitalized infection during the first year of treatment was identified through linkage to national registers. Incidence rates (IRs) with 95% CIs per 100 patient-years were calculated. Adjusted hazard ratios were estimated through Cox regression, with secukinumab as the reference. Several sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate confounding by indication. Results Among 7708 patients with SpA and 5760 patients with PsA, we identified 16 229 treatment courses of TNFi (53% bionaïve) and 1948 with secukinumab (11% bionaïve). For secukinumab, the first-year risk of hospitalized infection was 3.5% (IR 5.0; 3.9–6.3), compared with 1.7% (IR 2.3; 1.7–3.0) during 3201 courses with adalimumab, with the IRs for other TNFi lying in between these values. The adjusted HR for adalimumab, compared with secukinumab, was 0.58 (0.39–0.85). In sensitivity analyses, the difference from secukinumab was somewhat attenuated and in some analyses no longer statistically significant. Conclusion When used according to clinical practice in the Nordic countries, the observed first-year absolute risk of hospitalized infection was doubled for secukinumab compared with adalimumab. This excess risk seemed largely explained by confounding by indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with significant morbidity. The pathogenesis remains incompletely understood although immune dysregulation plays an important role. It is challenging to treat and approximately 50% of patients respond clinically to adalimumab, the only licensed treatment. Objectives To examine differences between lesional and nonlesional HS skin at baseline using bulk RNA sequencing, and to compare the transcriptome in the skin before and after 12 weeks of treatment with adalimumab. To examine transcriptomic differences between adalimumab responders and nonresponders using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response and the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4); and to compare transcriptomic differences based on disease severity (Hurley stage and IHS4). Methods We completed bulk RNA sequencing on lesional and nonlesional skin samples of patients before and after 12 weeks of treatment with adalimumab. Results Baseline differentially expressed genes and pathways between lesional and nonlesional skin highlighted chemokines and antimicrobial peptides produced by keratinocytes; B-cell function; T-cell-receptor, interleukin-17 and nuclear factor-κB signalling; and T-helper-cell differentiation. Transcriptomic differences were identified in lesional skin at baseline, between subsequent responders and nonresponders. Patients with severe HS who did not respond to adalimumab had enriched complement and B-cell activation pathways at baseline. In addition, logistic regression identified CCL28 in baseline lesional HS skin as a potential biomarker of treatment response. Conclusions This highlights the potential for targeting B-cell and complement pathways in HS treatment and the potential of stratifying patients at baseline to the most suitable treatment based on the skin transcriptome. CCL28 has not previously been identified in HS skin and has potential clinical relevance due to its antimicrobial function and homing of B and T cells at epithelial surfaces. Our results provide data to inform future translational and clinical studies on therapeutics in HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background No reliable biomarkers to predict response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in RA patients currently exist. The aims of this study were to replicate changes in gene co-expression modules that were previously reported in response to TNFi therapy in RA; to test if changes in module expression are specific to TNFi therapy; and to determine whether module expression transitions towards a disease-free state in responding patients. Method Published transcriptomic data from the whole blood of disease-free controls (n  = 10) and RA patients, treated with the TNFi adalimumab (n  = 70) or methotrexate (n  = 85), were studied. Treatment response was assessed using the EULAR response criteria following 3 or 6 months of treatment. Change in transcript expression between pre- and post-treatment was recorded for previously defined modules. Linear mixed models tested whether modular expression after treatment transitioned towards a disease-free state. Results For 25 of the 27 modules, change in expression between pre- and post-treatment in the adalimumab cohort replicated published findings. Of these 25 modules, six transitioned towards a disease-free state by 3 months (P   <  0.05), irrespective of clinical response. One module (M3.2), related to inflammation and TNF biology, significantly correlated with response to adalimumab. Similar patterns of modular expression, with reduced magnitude, were observed in the methotrexate cohort. Conclusion This study provides independent validation of changes in module expression in response to therapy in RA. However, these effects are not specific to TNFi. Further studies are required to determine whether specific modules could assist molecular classification of therapeutic response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Whether patients with RA benefit from repeated trials of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) after three or more attempts is unknown. We aimed to describe treatment outcomes in each line of b/tsDMARD therapy. Methods Using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA from 2001 to 2020, change to a new b/tsDMARD (except biosimilar switches) was defined as a new line of therapy. Treatment outcomes were compared across lines of therapy, including DAS28 remission (≤2.6), low disease activity (LDA, ≤3.2) at 6 months and median time to drug discontinuation. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Results A total of 22 934 individuals starting a first b/tsDMARD were included (mean age 56 years, 76% female), among whom 10 823 commenced a second-line drug, 5056 third, 2128 fourth, 767 fifth and 292 sixth. Most (71%) had sufficient data for DAS28-derived outcome analyses. TNF inhibitors were the most common first-line drug, but choice of subsequent-line drugs changed over time. Seventeen percent achieved DAS28 remission following first-line, 13% second and 8–13% with third through sixth. LDA was achieved in 29% of first-line, 23% second, 17–22% through to the sixth. Patients stayed on first-line therapy for a median of 2.6 years, ranging from 1.0–1.4 years for lines two to six. Conclusion Many patients will eventually benefit after repeated trials of b/tsDMARD. Further research to improve treatment selection are needed to prevent prolonged trial and error approaches in some patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]