Search

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of people with stroke and their whānau on barriers to accessing best practice care across Aotearoa, and to brainstorm potential solutions., Method: We conducted ten focus groups nationwide and completed a thematic analysis., Results: Analysis of the data collected from the focus groups identified five themes: (1) inconsistencies in stroke care; (2) importance of effective communication; (3) the role of whānau support; (4) the need for more person rather than stroke centred processes; and (5) experienced inequities. Participants also identified potential solutions., Conclusion: Key recommendations include the need for improved access to stroke unit care for rural residents, improved post-discharge support and care coordination involving the whānau, improved communication across the patient journey, and a concerted effort to improve culturally safe care. Next step is to implement and monitor these recommendations., Competing Interests: The study was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC 17/037). Some of the authors receive other grant funding, but none that relates to this study, and report no competing interests.

Aim: To describe stroke services currently offered in New Zealand hospitals and compare service provision in urban and non-urban settings., Method: An online questionnaire was sent to stroke lead clinicians at all New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs). Questions covered number and location of stroke inpatients, stroke service configuration, use of guidelines/protocols, staffing mix, access to staff education, and culture appropriate care., Results: There were responses from all 20 DHBs. Differences between urban and non-urban hospitals included: access to acute stroke units (55.6% non-urban vs 100% urban; p=0.013), stroke clinical nurse specialists (50% vs 90%; p=0.034), stroke clot retrieval (38.9% vs 80%; p=0.037) and Pacific support services (55.6% vs 100%; p=0.030). There were also differences in carer training (66.7% non-urban vs 100% urban; p=0.039) and goal-specific rehabilitation plans in the community (61.1% vs 100%; p=0.023). Access to TIA services, stroke rehabilitation units, early supported discharge, psychologists, continuing staff education, and culturally responsive stroke care were suboptimal irrespective of hospital location., Conclusion: Hospital location is associated with differences in stroke services provision across New Zealand and ongoing work is required to optimise consistent access to best practice care. These results, in conjunction with an ongoing (REGIONS Care) study, will be used to determine whether this affects patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Prof. Cadilhac is the Data Custodian for the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry.