Search

There are significantly fewer options for the treatment of bipolar depression than major depressive disorder, with an urgent need for alternative therapies. In this pilot study, we treated six subjects with bipolar disorder types I and II (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria) who had been in a current depressive episode for at least four weeks. Four subjects were female (66.66%), and the mean age was 45.33 (±12.32). Subjects received adjunct treatment with two arketamine intravenous infusions one week apart-0.5 mg/kg first and then 1 mg/kg. The mean baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was 36.66, which decreased to 27.83 24h after the first infusion of 0.5 mg/kg of arketamine (p = 0.036). In respect of the 1 mg/kg dose, the mean MADRS total score before the second infusion was 32.0, which dropped to 17.66 after 24h (p < 0.001). Arketamine appears to have rapid-acting antidepressant properties, consistent with previous animal studies on major depression. All individuals tolerated both doses, exhibiting nearly absent dissociation, and no manic symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this pilot trial is the first to test the feasibility and safety of the (R)-enantiomer of ketamine (arketamine) for bipolar depression., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Quarantini reports consulting fees from Allergan, Abbott, Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Lundbeck and research fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Lacerda reports grants and personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Cristalia Produtos Químicos e Farmacêuticos, Libbs, Pfizer, Myralis Farma, Aché Laboratórios, Hypera Pharmaand Sanofi-Aventis, grants from Eli Lilly, H. Lundbeck A/S, Servier Laboratories, Hoffman-La Roche, Forum Pharmaceuticals and from public programs: CNPq and FAPESP., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Dissociative symptoms are common, possibly severe, side effects associated with the use of ketamine and esketamine in depression. We investigated the relationship between trait dissociation and dissociation induced by ketamine and esketamine used as augmentation therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Adults with TRD were randomly assigned to receive a single intravenous infusion, with a duration of 40 min, of either esketamine 0.25 mg/kg or ketamine 0.5 mg/kg. We assessed trait dissociation with the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES) and, to evaluate induced dissociation, the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) was used. Thirty-two subjects received esketamine and 29 received ketamine. The groups had similar median DES scores (p = 0.26). More than 30% of the patients in both groups had DES scores ≥30 points. The median CADSS score in the esketamine group was equivalent to that in the ketamine group (p = 0.40). Every 5 points increment in the DES was associated with a 10.9% (95% CI 4.5-17.8%) increase in the CADSS, in an exponential fashion when the two groups were pooled together. Subjects with high trait dissociation had a higher risk of induced dissociation state (relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) and very high induced dissociation (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.14-8.15). Induced dissociation was not a serious adverse effect. The findings suggest that trait dissociation is a predictor of induced dissociation by Ketamine or Esketamine in TRD subjects. Screening for trait dissociation and counseling patients with high trait dissociation on the risks of dissociation by these drugs are recommended., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Crack-cocaine addiction is an important public health problem worldwide. Although there is not a consensus, preliminary evidence has suggested that cognitive impairments in patients with crack-cocaine dependence persist during abstinence, affecting different neuropsychological domains. However, few studies have prospectively evaluated those deficits in different phases of abstinence., Objectives: The main aim of present study was to examine neuropsychological performance of patients with crack-cocaine dependence during early abstinence and after four weeks, comparing with matched controls., Methods: Thirty-five males with crack-cocaine dependence, aged 18 to 50years, who met DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence and a control group of 33 healthy men were enrolled. They were assessed through Block Design, Digit Span and Vocabulary of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III), the Rey Auditory Learning Test (RAVLT) and the Verbal Fluency (FAS) between 3 and 10days (mean of 6.1±2.0days) and after 4weeks of abstinence., Results: Compared to controls, the crack-cocaine dependent group exhibited deficits in cognitive performance affecting attention, verbal memory and learning tasks in early withdrawal. Most of the cognitive deficits persisted after four weeks of abstinence., Conclusion: Present results observed that the group of patients with crack-cocaine dependence presented persistent deficits affecting memory and attention even after four weeks of abstinence, confirming previous studies that had disclosed such cognitive impairments., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)