Search

Introduction The COVID-19 outbreak has become the dominant issue throughout the world whilst the governments, nations and health services are trying to deal with its impact. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of COVID-19 on patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) at European referral centers in terms of surgical volume (SV), waiting list meant as time from biopsy to surgery (WL) and risk of adverse pathologic findings at RP due to the selection of men with more adverse disease characteristics at final pathology. Material and methods Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of histologically proven PCa treated with RP between March 2020 (WHO declaration of pandemic) and December 2020 were identified. Patients with metastatic disease not eligible to local treatment and recurrent prostate cancer after RP or RT were excluded. Patients treated at the same institutions between March 2019 and December 2019 were considered as the control group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis tested the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the risk of adverse pathologic findings at RP after adjusting for confounders. The percentage change of SV and WL was assessed comparing the months of pandemic with the equivalent timespan of the previous year. Results A total of 2,574 patients treated with RP (927 cases and 1647 controls) were identified in 8 European tertiary referral centers. At multivariable analysis patients who were treated during the pandemic had higher risk of extra prostatic disease (OR:1.35, p = 0.038) and lymph node invasion (LNI) (OR:1.72, p = 0.048). An average 23% reduction of the SV with the equivalent timespan of the previous year allowed an illusory reduction of the WL after the peak gained during the first wave of COVID-19. Conclusions Our results showed that the COVID-19 outbreak resulted in a delay in the administration of curative-intent therapies in patients with localized PCa. This, in turn, resulted in a stage migration phenomenon with a potential impact on oncologic control. Weitere Verfasser:innen aus Einrichtungen außerhalb der Universität Duisburg-Essen sind nicht aufgeführt.

Introduction Transitional cell carcinoma recurrence within an intestinal urinary diversion (TCCUD) after radical cystectomy (RC) is a rare condition with unknown origin, prognosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to describe treatment options and oncologic outcomes of this understudied site of recurrence in a multi-institutional case series. Material and methods TCCUD relapse cases after RC were investigated in a retrospective, multi-institutional study. Surgical approach and adjuvant chemotherapy were discussed. Early and late complications were described according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess progression-free and cancer-specific survival. Results A total of 19 patients were selected. The most common presentation was gross hematuria. The median interval between RC and TCCUD was 51.2 months. Fifteen patients (78.9%) underwent surgical excision, and two underwent concomitant radical nephroureterectomy. In 12 (63.1%) cases the site of TCCUD was the uretero-ileal anastomosis. Tumor invading the muscularis of the intestinal diversion was described in 10 (52.6%) cases. Surgical complications occurred in 7/15 (46.6%) patients, of these two with Clavien-Dindo Grade III. Four patients (21.0%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and two (10.5%) both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. During follow-up 15 patients (78.9%) presented with other sites of recurrence, with lymph nodes (21.0%) and liver (15.7%) being the most common localizations. Recurrence free and overall survival rates were 36.8% and 15.8%, and 56.5% and 24.2%, respectively at 12 and 18 months. Conclusions Most patients with TCCUD have invasive disease and a substantial percentage experience upper tract cancer during their disease course. TCCUD is often the herald of advanced disease and systemic progression, with poor progression-free and overall survival rates.

Introduction Frailty used as predictive tool is still not carried out in daily practice, although many studies confirm the great clinical importance of the frailty syndrome in surgical outcomes. There is no standardized method of measuring the physiological reserves of older surgical patients. The aim of this study was to analyze a cohort of older urological patients according to various frailty indices, in order to evaluate whether they are predictors of post-operative complications after urological procedures. Material and methods This is a prospective observational study on 78 consecutive older (≥70 years) patients, subjected to major urological (both endoscopic and 'open surgical') procedures. Frailty was defined according to the Edmonton Frail Scale. Several risk models and biochemical parameters were evaluated. Post-operative outcomes were surgical and medical complications, mortality and rehospitalisation within 3 months. Results An overall prevalence of frailty of 21.8% was found. Patients with complications were frailer than those without complications (univariate analysis), considering both total patients (p = 0.002) and endoscopic (p = 0.04) and 'open surgical' patients (p = 0.013). However, in multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was not found between all frailty indices tested and the risk of major complications. Limitation of the study: the small sample size (lack of statistical power), although this is a prospective study focused on older urological patients. Conclusions New urology-tailored pre-operative assessment tools may prove beneficial when calculating the risks/benefits of urological procedures, so that objective data can guide surgical decision- making and patient counselling. Further large clinical studies specifically focusing on elderly in urology will be needed.