1. Monetary incentives for improving smartphone-measured oral hygiene behaviors in young children: A randomized pilot trial.
- Author
-
White, Justin S., Ramos-Gomez, Francisco, Liu, Jenny X., Jue, Bonnie, Finlayson, Tracy L., Garza, Jeremiah R., Crawford, Alexandra H., Helman, Sarit, Santo, William, Cheng, Jing, Kahn, James G., and Gansky, Stuart A.
- Subjects
MONETARY incentives ,CHILD psychology ,TOOTHBRUSHES ,ORAL hygiene ,DENTAL care utilization ,MOBILE apps ,DIGITAL photography ,SMART cities - Abstract
Aims: To assess feasibility, acceptability, and early efficacy of monetary incentive-based interventions on fostering oral hygiene in young children measured with a Bluetooth-enabled toothbrush and smartphone application. Design: A stratified, parallel-group, three-arm individually randomized controlled pilot trial. Setting: Two Los Angeles area Early Head Start (EHS) sites. Participants: 36 parent-child dyads enrolled in an EHS home visit program for 0–3 year olds. Interventions: Eligible dyads, within strata and permuted blocks, were randomized in equal allocation to one of three groups: waitlist (delayed monetary incentive) control group, fixed monetary incentive package, or lottery monetary incentive package. The intervention lasted 8 weeks. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were a) toothbrushing performance: mean number of Bluetooth-recorded half-day episodes per week when the child's teeth were brushed, and b) dental visit by the 2-month follow-up among children with no prior dental visit. The a priori milestone of 20% more frequent toothbrushing identified the intervention for a subsequent trial. Feasibility and acceptability measures were also assessed, including frequency of parents syncing the Bluetooth-enabled toothbrush to the smartphone application and plaque measurement from digital photographs. Findings: Digital monitoring of toothbrushing was feasible. Mean number of weekly toothbrushing episodes over 8 weeks was 3.9 in the control group, 4.1 in the fixed incentive group, and 6.0 in the lottery incentive group. The lottery group had 53% more frequent toothbrushing than the control group and 47% more frequent toothbrushing than the fixed group. Exploratory analyses showed effects concentrated among children ≤24 months. Follow-up dental visit attendance was similar across groups. iPhone 7 more reliably captured evaluable images than Photomed Cannon G16. Conclusions: Trial protocol and outcome measures were deemed feasible and acceptable. Results informed the study protocol for a fully powered trial of lottery incentives versus a delayed control using the smart toothbrush and remote digital incentive program administration. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03862443. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF