Search

This document is a correction notice for an article titled "Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in Taiwan" published in the journal PLoS ONE. The correction addresses errors in the Funding statement and Competing Interests statement. The correct Funding statement acknowledges the sponsorship of various organizations, while clarifying that they had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The correct Competing Interests statement clarifies that two of the authors were executive directors of sponsoring agencies but declared no competing interests. The document also mentions that the Acknowledgement section was missing from the original article and provides the correct section, which includes gratitude to study participants, research assistants, interviewers, and others involved in the study. [Extracted from the article]

Background: We aimed to provide real-world information on survival, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and expenditures related to various first lines of therapy (1LOTs) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who were transplant ineligible (TI). Patients and methods: From the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (2008–2016), we identified 1,511 NDMM-TI patients who had received 1LOT since June 2012. We categorized 1LOT regimens into four groups: bortezomib (V)+thalidomide (T), V, T, and non-V/T. Patients' characteristics were collected. The overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), frequencies of HCRU (hospitalization, visiting outpatient and emergency departments), and related expenditures within one year after commencement of the 1LOT were evaluated and compared. Results: The mean age of the included patients was 71.3 (SD 10.7) years, and 40.4% of patients had a CCI score ≥3. Most patients (747; 49.4%) were in the V+T group and, after adjusting for covariates, had a significantly longer OS (median, 22.2 months) and EFS (9.1 months) than those in the T group (12.6 and 4.5 months, respectively) and the non-V/T group (12.2 and 3.2 months, respectively), but they were mostly comparable with patients in the V group (23.8 and 6.6 months, respectively). Compared to those in the V+T group, patients in the T and non-V/T groups had 29% and 39% fewer outpatient visits and 15% and 24% lower total expenditure, respectively. Conclusion: Our real-world data consolidate evidence for the effectiveness of bortezomib-containing regimens as the 1LOT in NDMM-TI patients at the expense of more outpatient visits and higher total costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To date, a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on the health state preferences of the general Taiwanese population has not been available. This study aimed to develop a Taiwanese value set for EQ-5D-5L to facilitate health technology assessment for medical products and services. Methods: An international standardized protocol for EQ-5D-5L valuation studies developed by the EuroQol group was adopted. Adult members of the general public were recruited from six geographic regions in Taiwan. In computer-based face-to-face interviews, each participant completed 10 composite time trade-off (C-TTO) tasks and 7 discrete choice experiment (DCE) tasks. The C-TTO and DCE data were modeled alone or in combination (using hybrid models) with additive models containing 20 dummy variables as main effects. The model performance was assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively (mainly logical consistency and prediction patterns). Results: Of 1,073 recruited participants, 1,000 completed the study. Approximately 13% of observed utility values were -1 in the C-TTO tasks. The hybrid model, using all available data that assumed C-TTO response values left-censored at -1 and with main effects coefficients with logical consistency (monotonicity), was considered as the most appropriate model. The predicted utility ranged from -1.0259 to 1. Conclusions: An EQ-5D-5L value set was developed for Taiwan using an established study protocol and a representative sample of the general population. This may facilitate health economic evaluations and decision making on resource allocation under Taiwan’s national health insurance program in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Whether a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal is essential in secondary prevention is still being debated. The aim of our study was to investigate whether achieving particular LDL-C level goals is associated with the reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) on statin therapy. Methods and results: From January 2010 to August 2014, a total of 4099 patients with ASCVD in the Taiwan Secondary Prevention for patients with AtheRosCLErotic disease (T-SPARCLE) registry were analyzed. The risk of a MACE was lower in patients with LDL-C level under control at < 100 mg/dL by statins than in patients with LDL-C level ≥100 mg/dL whether on statin therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04‒2.63, p = 0.03) or not (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.06‒3.94, p = 0.03). In multivariate Cox model analyses, statin intensity had no significant predictive value, and LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL was associated with a slight but not significant trend toward increased risk of MACEs (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.96‒2.07, p = 0.08). Conclusions: For patients with ASCVD on statin therapy guided by a target-driven strategy, failure to control LDL-C levels to < 100 mg/dL was associated with higher risk of MACEs. Statin intensity alone had no significant impact on the risk of MACEs after multivariate adjustment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]