1. Assessment of psychological resilience in a large cohort of the general population: Validation and norm values of the RS-5.
- Author
-
Reinwarth AC, Hahad O, Ghaemi Kerahrodi J, Brähler E, Lieb K, Gilan D, Zahn D, Chalabi J, Schuster AK, Schepers M, Lackner KJ, Schattenberg JM, Ruf W, Wild PS, Daiber A, Michal M, Beutel ME, and Münzel T
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anxiety psychology, Anxiety epidemiology, Depression epidemiology, Depression psychology, Reference Values, Resilience, Psychological, Psychometrics methods
- Abstract
Background: Psychological resilience is known as a protective factor against mental health disorders for which valid measures are indispensable. The present work aims to evaluate the Resilience Scale-5 (RS-5) psychometrically, and provide norm values., Methods: Data from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS), encompassing 7,496 participants aged 25 to 86, spanning the years 2017 to 2022, was used. Selectivity, item difficulty, internal consistency, construct and factor validity, as well as factorial invariance were tested. Additionally, correlations and associations with depression, anxiety, and sociodemographic factors were determined. Furthermore, norm values were provided., Results: The RS-5 displayed robust psychometric properties. Participants reported an average resilience score of 28.94 (SD = 5.53, median = 30, IQR = 6, range = 5-35), with those aged ≥75 exhibiting the highest resilience levels (M = 30.21, SD = 5.75, median = 32, IQR = 7). The RS-5 displayed a very good model fit, affirming measurement invariance across sex and age decades. Construct validity found support through anticipated intercorrelations with related psychological constructs. Significant correlations (p < .001) linked higher resilience with female gender, advanced age, higher education, elevated household income, and diminished psychological distress., Conclusion: The RS-5 emerged as a reliable and economic instrument for assessing psychological resilience in individuals aged 25 to 86. The study unraveled distinct sociodemographic characteristics significantly tied to resilience levels within this cohort. In contributing recent norm values tailored to the German population, this research enhances the practical applicability of the RS-5 across diverse contexts and enriches our comprehension of the demographic nuances associated with psychological resilience., Competing Interests: Philipp S. Wild is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01EO1503). P.S.W. and T.M. are PIs and O.H. is a Young Scientist of the DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all of the journal policies on sharing data and materials. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The other authors A.C.R., J. G.-K., E.B., K.L., D.G., D.Z., J.C., A.K.S., M.S., K.J.L., J.M.S., W.R., A.D., M.M, and M.E.B. declare no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Reinwarth et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF