Search

High-risk human papillomavirus infection (HR-HPV) is necessary but not the only factor needed to develop cervical cancer. It is essential to estimate cervical cancer development risk in the population of high-risk HPV-positive women and to avoid unnecessary examinations and treatment in low-risk individuals. The study aimed to identify associations between different personal factors, vaginal microflora, sexually transmitted, high-risk HPV infection, and various degrees of cervical precancerous lesions. A study was performed in 2016-2020. The study group consisted of 112 patients with abnormal cervical cytology results referred for colposcopic examination. 120 women who came for a routine gynecological check-up were included in the control group. Material from the cervix and upper vaginal fornix was taken for pH measurement, wet mount microscopy, testing the six most common high-risk HPV DNA types (16/18, 31, 33, 45, 58), HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and 7 genital infections-C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhea, T. vaginalis, M. hominis, M. genitalium, U. urealyticum, U. parvum. Results showed that women with all grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) more often were smokers, had increased vaginal pH levels, and had positive HR-HPV DNA and HR HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression. Abnormal vaginal microflora, especially types associated with aerobic vaginitis, and M. hominis were significantly more often found in women with CIN2+. The presence of C.trachomatis, U. parvum, and U.urealyticum did not differ between the groups. The most important factors independently associated with CIN2+ were positive high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression (OR 59.4, 95% CI 14.84-237.51), and positive high-risk HPV DNA (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.16-13.23). Higher education level was associated with reduced risk of CIN2+ (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.71). In conclusion, this study reports HR-HPV DNA of the most common six types and E6/E7 mRNA positivity as the most significant factors associated with CIN2+ lesions and higher education related to lower risk of high-grade cervical lesions.

BACKGROUND:The incidence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) varies significantly over time. To better understand the annual incidence of all TBE cases in Latvia we investigated the disease burden in the country from 1973-2016 using several available sources and case definitions. METHODS:We identified cases of TBE from an electronic database (maintained by the Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia [CDPC]) by the use of ICD-10 diagnosis codes for TBE (A84; A84.0; A84.1; A84.8; A84.9). In addition, previously unreported TBE cases were found by review of TBE diagnoses according to ICD-10 codes in four hospital databases. RESULTS:From 1973 to 2016 a total of 15,193 TBE cases were reported to the CDPC, 2,819 of which were reported from January 2007 through December 2016, additionally for this time period, 104 cases were identified via hospital survey. From all 2,923 reported cases (2007-2016), 1,973 met TBE case definition criteria and were included in the TBE study analysis. The highest average 10 year incidence was observed from 1990-1999 (27.9 cases per 100,000; range 4.6-53.0), however, the average 10-year incidence from 2007-2016 using officially adopted TBE case definition was 9.6 cases per 100,000 (range 5.8-14.6). For this 10-year time period most cases were adults (95.1%) and male (52.2%). The most common clinical form of TBE was meningitis (90.6%). A tick bite prior to TBE onset was reported in 60.6% of TBE cases and 98.2% of cases were not vaccinated against TBE. CONCLUSION:The data demonstrate that the incidence of TBE varies by about one third based on the case definition used. TBE occurs almost entirely in the unvaccinated population. Regular TBE awareness campaigns could encourage the population in Latvia to use protective measures to further control TBE in the country, either via vaccination or tick avoidance.