Search

BackgroundPostoperative immunosuppression has been recognized as an important driver of surgery-related morbidity and mortality. It is characterized by lymphocyte depression and impaired monocyte capability to present foreign antigens to T-cells via Major Histocompatibility Complex, Class II (MHC-II) molecules. In patients with postoperative abdominal sepsis, we previously detected a persisting differential binding of the CCCTC-Binding Factor (CTCF), a superordinate regulator of transcription, inside the MHC-II region with specific impact on human leucocyte antigen (HLA) gene expression. In this prospective exploratory study, we investigated to which extent major surgery affects the MHC-II region of circulating CD14+-monocytes.ResultsIn non-immunocompromised patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, a postoperative loss of monocyte HLA-DR surface receptor density was accompanied by a decline in the transcription levels of the classical MHC-II genes HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1. The surgical event decreased the expression of the transcriptional MHC-II regulators CIITA and CTCF and led to a lower CTCF enrichment at an intergenic sequence within the HLA-DR subregion. During the observation period, we found a slow and only incomplete restoration of monocyte HLA-DR surface receptor density as well as a partial recovery of CIITA, HLA-DRA and HLA-DRB1 expression. In contrast, transcription of HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, CTCF and binding of CTCF within the MHC-II remained altered.ConclusionIn circulating monocytes, major surgery does not globally affect MHC-II transcription but rather induces specific changes in the expression of selected HLA genes, followed by differential recovery patterns and accompanied by a prolonged reduction of CTCF expression and binding within the MHC-II region. Our results hint toward a long-lasting impact of a major surgical intervention on monocyte functionality, possibly mediated by epigenetic changes that endure the life span of the individual cell.

BACKGROUND:With more than 18 million annual new cases, cancer belongs to the major challenges of modern healthcare. Surgical resection of solid tumours under general anaesthesia is the prime therapy. Different aspects of anaesthesia are under discussion to independently influence the long-term outcome of cancer patients. Most recently, the commonly used volatile anaesthetics like sevoflurane have entered the spotlight, as retrospective studies suggest a detrimental outcome in certain cancer aetiologies with sparse mechanistic understanding. Our objective was to investigate this concept in a murine melanoma model, herein comparing the consequence of inhalative and injection anesthesia on tumour composition and growth. METHODS:We used a murine model of malignant melanoma in male, adult C57BL/6 mice (n = 92), induced by the subcutaneous injection of B16-F10 cells. We either exposed the melanoma cells to sevoflurane before implantation or subjected the animals to single or double anaesthesia with either volatile or injection drugs. After a maximum follow-up of 4 weeks, leucocytes within the tumour microenvironment (TME) were comprehensively analysed by flow cytometry with focus on tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). RESULTS:We found that exposure of melanoma cells to sevoflurane before implantation induced long-lasting transcriptome changes and aggravated tumour growth, without extensive changes of the TME. Contrastingly, both a single and double anaesthesia with sevoflurane led to a significant reduction of TAMs (injection vs. sevoflurane: 2,0 vs. 0.3% and 1.2 vs. 0.6%, respectively), whilst increasing PD-L1 expression on the remaining cells (mean fluorescent intensity injection vs. sevoflurane: 3,804 vs. 7,143 and 9,090 vs. 32,228, respectively). No changes in tumour growth were observed in these groups. CONCLUSION:In sharp contrast to the detrimental impact of sevoflurane on patients' outcome reported in retrospective clinical studies, we propose here that sevoflurane might actually exert a beneficial effect by decreasing TAMs within the TME, rendering the tumour again susceptible for cytotoxic T cells and immunotherapies. Further research is warranted to delineate, how these results translate into the clinic.