Search

Background/purpose: The study was to assess the relationship between antibiotic therapy and the outcome in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection (BSI)., Methods: ICU patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia BSI from January 2004 to December 2019 were included and divided into two groups-those with- and without appropriate antibiotic therapy after BSI-for comparison. The primary outcome was the relationship between appropriate antibiotic therapy and 14-day mortality. The secondary outcome was the influence of different antibiotic therapies: levofloxacin- and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)-containing regimens, on 14-day mortality., Results: A total of 214 ICU patients were included. Patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy (n = 133) after BSI had a lower 14-day mortality than those (n = 81) without appropriate antibiotic therapy (10.5% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). No difference on 14-day mortality between groups of patients by time of appropriate antibiotic therapy was observed (p > 0.05). After a propensity score matching, the results is consistent that 14-day mortality were lower in patients with appropriate antibiotic therapy than those without appropriate antibiotic therapy (11.5% vs. 39.3%, p < 0.001). Among patients with S. maltophilia BSI receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy, there was a trend levofloxacin-containing regimens is associated with lower mortality than TMP/SMX-containing regimens (HR 0.233, 95% CI 0.050-1.084, p = 0.063)., Conclusion: Appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with decreased 14-day mortality in ICU patients with S. maltophilia BSI regardless of time. Levofloxacin-containing regimens may be better choice than TMP/SMX -containing regimens in treating ICU patients with S. maltophilia BSI., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The emergence of concurrent levofloxacin- and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (LTSRSM) in Taiwan is becoming a serious problem, but clinical data analysis on this has not been reported., Methods: A matched case-control-control study was conducted to investigate risk factors for LTSRSM occurrence in hospitalized patients. For patients with LTSRSM infection/colonization (the case group), two matched control groups were used: control group A with levofloxacin- and TMP/SMX-susceptible S. maltophilia (LTSSSM) and control group B without S. maltophilia. Besides, tigecycline, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, and colistin susceptibilities in collected LTSRSM and levofloxacin- and TMP/SMX-susceptible S. maltophilia (LTSSSM) isolates were compared., Results: From January 2014 to June 2016, 129 LTSRSM from cultured 1213 S. maltophilia isolates (10.6%) were identified. A total of 107 LTSRSM infected patients paired with 107 LTSSSM-, and 107 non-S. maltophilia-infected ones were included. When compared with control group A, previous fluoroquinolone and TMP/SMX use was found to be independently associated with LTSRSM occurrence. When compared with control group B, mechanical ventilation, cerebrovascular disease, and previous fluoroquinolone use were risk factors for LTSRSM occurrence. Eighty-five LTSRSM and 85 LTSSSM isolates were compared for antibiotic susceptibilities; the resistance rates and minimum inhibitory concentrations of tigecycline and ceftazidime were significantly higher for LTSRSM than for LTSSSM isolates., Conclusion: The emergence of LTSRSM showing cross resistance to tigecycline and ceftazidime would further limit current therapeutic options. Cautious fluoroquinolone and TMP/SMX use may be helpful to limit such high-level resistant strains of S. maltophilia occurrence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background/purpose: Bloodstream infection is a leading cause of mortality among burn patients. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors, causative pathogens, and the relationship between bloodstream infections and other infections among burn patients from the Formosa Fun Coast Dust Explosion., Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics, infection types, causative pathogen(s), and isolates' antibiotic susceptibilities from patients who were hospitalized between June 27 and September 31, 2015., Results: Fifty-eight patients were admitted during the study period (36 males, mean age: 22.6 years). The mean burned total body surface area (TBSA) was 40% for all patients. Eighteen (31%) patients with mean TBSA of 80% had 66 episodes of bloodstream infections caused by 92 isolates. Twelve (18.2%) episodes of bloodstream infections were polymicrobial. Acinetobacter baumannii (19, 20.7%), Ralstonia pickettii (17, 18.5%), and Chryseobacterium meningosepticum (13, 14.1%) were the most common pathogens causing bloodstream infections. A high concordance rate of wound cultures with blood cultures was seen in Staphylococcus aureus (3, 75%) and C. meningosepticum (8, 61.5%) infections. However, no Ralstonia isolate was found in burn wounds of patients with Ralstonia bacteremia. A high concordance rate of central venous catheter cultures with blood cultures was noted in Ralstonia mannitolilytica (5, 62.5%) and Chryseobacterium indologenes (3, 60%) infections. Approximately 21.1% of A. baumannii strains were resistant to carbapenem. All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to methicillin., Conclusions: Waterborne bacteria should be considered in patients of burns with possible water contact. Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics should be considered for patients who were hospitalized for severe sepsis, or septic shock with a large burn. Antibiotic treatment should be administered based on the specific pathogens and their detection points., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background/purpose: Infection is the most common cause of death following burn injury. The study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) with the other current benchmarks as early predictors of septic shock and bloodstream infection in burn patients., Methods: We included 24 patients admitted to the Burn Unit of a medical center from June 2015 to December 2015 from the Formosa Fun Coast dust explosion. We categorized all patients at initial admission into either sepsis or septic shock groups. Laboratory tests including the worst PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, platelet (PLT), and white blood cell (WBC) count were performed at <48 h after admission. Patients were also classified in two groups with subsequent bacteremia and non-bacteremia groups during hospitalization., Results: Significantly higher PCT levels were observed among participants with septic shock compared to those with sepsis (47.19 vs. 1.18 ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients with bacteremia had significantly elevated PCT levels compared to patients without bacteremia (29.54 versus 1.81 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in CRP levels, PLT, and WBC count between the two groups. PCT levels showed reasonable discriminative power (cut-off: 5.12 ng/mL; p = 0.01) in predicting of bloodstream infection in burn patients and the area under receiver operating curves was 0.92., Conclusions: PCT levels can be helpful in determining the septic shock and bloodstream infection in burn patients but CRP levels, PLT, and WBC count were of little diagnostic value., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Community-onset urinary tract infections (CoUTIs) are the most common bacterial infections, and a decline in antibiotic susceptibility causes many clinical challenges. Adequate empiric antibiotic treatment can decrease unnecessary hospital stays and complications, while reducing the antimicrobial resistance progression., Methods: From October 2014 to April 2015, we retrospectively enrolled patients who were at least 18 years old and required hospitalization for CoUTIs. Demographic variables of these patients, and uropathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibilities were evaluated., Results: In total, 457 patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 71.9 years, and 35.2% of the patients were male. Escherichia coli (54.5%) was the most common uropathogen, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.1%), Enterococcus spp. (7.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.6%), and Proteus mirabilis (3.5%). Bacteremia was present in 25.2% of patients. Diabetes mellitus and acute kidney injury at admission were risk factors for CoUTIs with concomitant bacteremia. Among the UTI-associated bloodstream strains, E. coli (53.1%) was also the most predominant pathogen, followed by K. pneumoniae (11.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (6.1%), and P. mirabilis (4.3%). The overall susceptibility of cefazolin was 62.8%, ceftriaxone 71.4%, ceftazidime 82.8%, flomoxef 82%, cefepime 94.5%, ampicillin-sulbactam 41.6%, piperacillin-tazobactam 85%, levofloxacin 65.2%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 61.5%, imipenem 92.3%, gentamicin 76.1%, and amikacin 97.5%. Cefazolin-susceptible isolates could be found more frequently among patients who are less than 65 years of age and without diabetes mellitus, had no UTI episode in the past year, and have no bacteremia risk. Patients with nasogastric tube retention more commonly experienced antimicrobial resistance to all the third-generation cephalosporins., Conclusion: Third-generation cephalosporins effectively treated CoUTIs. However, patients with nasogastric tube retention more commonly experienced cephalosporin resistance. Cefepime, imipenem, and amikacin may be used in patients with higher antimicrobial resistance. In selected patients, cefazolin may still be an adequate drug of choice for CoUTIs., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)