Search

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium (CP Ti)., Materials and Methods: Two hundred cast CP Ti disks were divided into 5 groups (n = 40), which were treated with one of the following air-abrasion techniques: (1) 50-µm Al2O3 particles; (2) 120-µm Al2O3 particles; (3) 250-µm Al2O3 particles; (4) 30-µm silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Cojet Sand); (5) 50-µm Al2O3 particles followed by 110-µm silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Rocatec Plus). For each air-abrasion technique, the following additional surface treatments were used (n = 10): (1) none; (2) adhesive Adper Single Bond 2; (3) silane RelyX Ceramic Primer; (4) silane plus adhesive. RelyX ARC resin cement was bonded to CP Ti surfaces. All specimens were thermocycled (5,000 cycles) before being tested in shear mode. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Failure mode was determined with a stereomicroscope (20X)., Results: The results revealed that the air-abrasion technique (p < 0.001), additional surface treatment (p < 0.001) and their interaction were significant (p < 0.001). Except for the 50-µm Al2O3 + adhesive group, 250-µm Al2O3 particles promoted significantly higher SBS than 50-µm Al2O3 particles (p < 0.001), while Rocatec Plus provided bond strengths that were similar to or higher than those of Cojet Sand. Of the additional surface treatments, the adhesive provided the best results in combination with the 3 air-abrasion techniques (50-µm, 120-µm, and 250-µm Al2O3), whereas in the groups abraded with silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Cojet Sand and Rocatec Plus), the best results were obtained with additional silane. The two combinations that promoted the highest SBS were 250-µm Al2O3 + adhesive and Rocatec Plus + silane. All groups showed 100% adhesive failure., Conclusion: The selection of the best additional surface treatment varied according to the air-abrasion technique. Particle size was the decisive factor in determining the bond strength when micromechanical retention was the only bonding mechanism. When both mechanisms were present, in addition to particle size, the material applied as the additional surface treatment also contributed to determining the bond strength.

Objectives: To evaluate, at different times, the diametral tensile strength (DTS) of dual-curing resin cements that were not photopolymerized., Method and Materials: Equal amounts of base and catalyst pastes of Panavia F (Kuraray), Variolink II (Vivadent), Rely X (3M ESPE), and Enforce (Dentsply) were mixed and inserted into cylindrical molds (4 x 2 mm) (n = 10). Cements were not photopolymerized. DTS test was performed in a testing machine at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 7 days. The specimens were stored in light-proof containers with distilled water at 37 degrees C until the time of assay. An autopolymerizing resin cement (Cement-It, Jeneric Pentron) and a zinc phosphate cement served as controls. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were performed separately for each cement and for each time (P <.05)., Results: All cements showed an increase in DTS when tested at 1 and 24 hours. Tests at 24 hours and 7 days revealed no statistically significant differences. In all groups, the zinc phosphate cement had the lowest DTS mean values (2.1 MPa, 3.6 MPa, 6.5 MPa, and 6.9 MPa), while Cement-It (35.1 MPa, 33.6 MPa, 46.9 MPa, and 46.3 MPa) and Enforce (31.9 MPa, 31.7 MPa, 43.4 MPa, and 47.6 MPa) presented the highest DTS mean values., Conclusion: All cements presented maximal strength at 24 hours. The dual-curing resin cements, even when nonphotopolymerized, demonstrated higher DTS than the zinc phosphate cement and similar or lower values than the autopolymerizing resin cement.

Objective: To assess the effect of metal conditioners on the bond strength between resin cements and cast titanium., Method and Materials: Commercially pure titanium (99.56%) was cast using an arc casting machine. Surfaces were finished with 400-grit silicon carbide paper followed by air abrasion with 50-Microm aluminum oxide. A piece of double-coated tape with a 4-mm circular hole was then positioned on the metal surface to control the area of the bond. The prepared surfaces were then divided into 4 groups (n=10): G1, unprimed Panavia F; G2, Alloy Primer-Panavia F; G3, unprimed Bistite DC; G4, Metaltite-Bistite DC. Forty minutes after insertion of the resin cements, the specimens were detached from the mold and stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Shear bond strength was performed in a testing machine (MTS 810) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test with a .05 significance level. The fractured surfaces were observed through an optical microscope at 103 magnification., Results: The G1 group demonstrated significantly higher shear bond strength (17.95 MPa) than the other groups. G3 (13.79 MPa) and G4 (12.98 MPa) showed similar mean values to each other and were statistically superior to G2 (9.31 MPa). Debonded surfaces generally presented adhesive failure between metal surfaces and resin cements., Conclusion: While the Metaltite conditioner did not influence the bond strength of the Bistite DC cement, the Alloy Primer conditioner significantly decreased the mean bond strength of the Panavia F cement.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to verify the effect of cyclic compressive loading on the shear bond strength of an adhesive system following collagen removal., Materials and Methods: Sixty bovine teeth were divided into 4 groups based on the adhesive procedure used: groups 1 and 2--etching with 35% phosphoric acid and application of the Single Bond adhesive system; groups 3 and 4--after etching, a 10% sodium hypochlorite solution was applied for 1 min before the application of the adhesive. In all the specimens, a Z100 resin cylinder was built up over the bond area. Groups 2 and 4 were submitted to 500,000 cycles with a load of 100 N., Results: The mean values for the shear bond test (MPa) were: group 1: 7.37 +/- 1.15; group 2: 5.72 +/- 1.66; group 3: 5.95 +/- 1.21; group 4: 3.66 +/- 1.12. There was no difference between groups 1 and 2 (p > 0.01). Between groups 1 and 3, 2 and 4, and 3 and 4 there was a significant difference (p < 0.01). The majority of the specimens demonstrated an adhesive failure., Conclusion: The application of sodium hypochlorite on dentin decreased the values of shear bond strength, as did the load cycling in the group treated with sodium hypochlorite.