Search

Objective: Both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a significant impact on quality of life, but few reports have compared the two diseases. The current study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA at diagnosis and after five years compared with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a matched general population. Methods: Patients with early PsA and early RA included in two Swedish registries with HRQoL data measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and at five years follow-up were included. Differences in SF-36 scores compared with the general population were calculated for each patient. Physical function, disease activity, the delay before diagnosis, pain, and general wellbeing were used as explanatory variables. Statistical tests included t-tests and univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results: PsA (n = 166) and RA (n = 133) patients of both sexes had significantly reduced HRQoL at disease onset. After five years, PsA patients still had impairments in several domains of SF-36, whereas RA patients had an almost normalized HRQoL. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis, disease activity, and disability independently contributed to the reduced improvement in PsA. Conclusion: Both early PsA and RA are characterized by severely reduced HRQoL. Despite more severe disease at inclusion, normalization of HRQoL is seen in patients with RA but not PsA. This may be due to delay in the diagnosis of PsA or more powerful interventions in RA. Earlier detection, lifestyle intervention, and more aggressive management strategies may be needed for PsA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved., Funding Agencies|Swedish Psoriasis Foundation

Objective: Both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a significant impact on quality of life, but few reports have compared the two diseases. The current study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA at diagnosis and after five years compared with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a matched general population. Methods: Patients with early PsA and early RA included in two Swedish registries with HRQoL data measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and at five years follow-up were included. Differences in SF-36 scores compared with the general population were calculated for each patient. Physical function, disease activity, the delay before diagnosis, pain, and general wellbeing were used as explanatory variables. Statistical tests included t-tests and univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results: PsA (n = 166) and RA (n = 133) patients of both sexes had significantly reduced HRQoL at disease onset. After five years, PsA patients still had impairments in several domains of SF-36, whereas RA patients had an almost normalized HRQoL. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis, disease activity, and disability independently contributed to the reduced improvement in PsA. Conclusion: Both early PsA and RA are characterized by severely reduced HRQoL. Despite more severe disease at inclusion, normalization of HRQoL is seen in patients with RA but not PsA. This may be due to delay in the diagnosis of PsA or more powerful interventions in RA. Earlier detection, lifestyle intervention, and more aggressive management strategies may be needed for PsA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved., Funding Agencies|Swedish Psoriasis Foundation

Objective: Both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a significant impact on quality of life, but few reports have compared the two diseases. The current study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA at diagnosis and after five years compared with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a matched general population. Methods: Patients with early PsA and early RA included in two Swedish registries with HRQoL data measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and at five years follow-up were included. Differences in SF-36 scores compared with the general population were calculated for each patient. Physical function, disease activity, the delay before diagnosis, pain, and general wellbeing were used as explanatory variables. Statistical tests included t-tests and univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results: PsA (n = 166) and RA (n = 133) patients of both sexes had significantly reduced HRQoL at disease onset. After five years, PsA patients still had impairments in several domains of SF-36, whereas RA patients had an almost normalized HRQoL. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis, disease activity, and disability independently contributed to the reduced improvement in PsA. Conclusion: Both early PsA and RA are characterized by severely reduced HRQoL. Despite more severe disease at inclusion, normalization of HRQoL is seen in patients with RA but not PsA. This may be due to delay in the diagnosis of PsA or more powerful interventions in RA. Earlier detection, lifestyle intervention, and more aggressive management strategies may be needed for PsA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved., Funding Agencies|Swedish Psoriasis Foundation

Objective: Both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a significant impact on quality of life, but few reports have compared the two diseases. The current study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA at diagnosis and after five years compared with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a matched general population. Methods: Patients with early PsA and early RA included in two Swedish registries with HRQoL data measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and at five years follow-up were included. Differences in SF-36 scores compared with the general population were calculated for each patient. Physical function, disease activity, the delay before diagnosis, pain, and general wellbeing were used as explanatory variables. Statistical tests included t-tests and univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results: PsA (n = 166) and RA (n = 133) patients of both sexes had significantly reduced HRQoL at disease onset. After five years, PsA patients still had impairments in several domains of SF-36, whereas RA patients had an almost normalized HRQoL. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis, disease activity, and disability independently contributed to the reduced improvement in PsA. Conclusion: Both early PsA and RA are characterized by severely reduced HRQoL. Despite more severe disease at inclusion, normalization of HRQoL is seen in patients with RA but not PsA. This may be due to delay in the diagnosis of PsA or more powerful interventions in RA. Earlier detection, lifestyle intervention, and more aggressive management strategies may be needed for PsA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved., Funding Agencies|Swedish Psoriasis Foundation

Objective: Both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a significant impact on quality of life, but few reports have compared the two diseases. The current study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA at diagnosis and after five years compared with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a matched general population. Methods: Patients with early PsA and early RA included in two Swedish registries with HRQoL data measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and at five years follow-up were included. Differences in SF-36 scores compared with the general population were calculated for each patient. Physical function, disease activity, the delay before diagnosis, pain, and general wellbeing were used as explanatory variables. Statistical tests included t-tests and univariate and multivariate linear regression. Results: PsA (n = 166) and RA (n = 133) patients of both sexes had significantly reduced HRQoL at disease onset. After five years, PsA patients still had impairments in several domains of SF-36, whereas RA patients had an almost normalized HRQoL. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis, disease activity, and disability independently contributed to the reduced improvement in PsA. Conclusion: Both early PsA and RA are characterized by severely reduced HRQoL. Despite more severe disease at inclusion, normalization of HRQoL is seen in patients with RA but not PsA. This may be due to delay in the diagnosis of PsA or more powerful interventions in RA. Earlier detection, lifestyle intervention, and more aggressive management strategies may be needed for PsA. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved., Funding Agencies|Swedish Psoriasis Foundation

OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18, Funding Agencies|Academy of FinlandAcademy of Finland [258536]; Finska Lakaresallskapet; South-Eastern Health Region, Norway, HUCH Institutional grant, Finland [1159005]; Icelandic Society for Rheumatology; interregional grant from all health regions in Norway; NordForsk [70945]; Regionernes Medicinpulje, Denmark [14/217]; Stockholm County Council, SwedenStockholm County Council [20100490]; Swedish Medical Research CouncilSwedish Medical Research Council (SMRC) [C0634901, D0342301, 2015-00891_5]; Swedish Rheumatism Association; Research Fund of University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland [A2015017]

OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18, Funding Agencies|Academy of FinlandAcademy of Finland [258536]; Finska Lakaresallskapet; South-Eastern Health Region, Norway, HUCH Institutional grant, Finland [1159005]; Icelandic Society for Rheumatology; interregional grant from all health regions in Norway; NordForsk [70945]; Regionernes Medicinpulje, Denmark [14/217]; Stockholm County Council, SwedenStockholm County Council [20100490]; Swedish Medical Research CouncilSwedish Medical Research Council (SMRC) [C0634901, D0342301, 2015-00891_5]; Swedish Rheumatism Association; Research Fund of University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland [A2015017]

OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18, Funding Agencies|Academy of FinlandAcademy of Finland [258536]; Finska Lakaresallskapet; South-Eastern Health Region, Norway, HUCH Institutional grant, Finland [1159005]; Icelandic Society for Rheumatology; interregional grant from all health regions in Norway; NordForsk [70945]; Regionernes Medicinpulje, Denmark [14/217]; Stockholm County Council, SwedenStockholm County Council [20100490]; Swedish Medical Research CouncilSwedish Medical Research Council (SMRC) [C0634901, D0342301, 2015-00891_5]; Swedish Rheumatism Association; Research Fund of University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland [A2015017]

OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18, Funding Agencies|Academy of FinlandAcademy of Finland [258536]; Finska Lakaresallskapet; South-Eastern Health Region, Norway, HUCH Institutional grant, Finland [1159005]; Icelandic Society for Rheumatology; interregional grant from all health regions in Norway; NordForsk [70945]; Regionernes Medicinpulje, Denmark [14/217]; Stockholm County Council, SwedenStockholm County Council [20100490]; Swedish Medical Research CouncilSwedish Medical Research Council (SMRC) [C0634901, D0342301, 2015-00891_5]; Swedish Rheumatism Association; Research Fund of University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland [A2015017]

OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intraarticular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI <= 2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18, Funding Agencies|Academy of FinlandAcademy of Finland [258536]; Finska Lakaresallskapet; South-Eastern Health Region, Norway, HUCH Institutional grant, Finland [1159005]; Icelandic Society for Rheumatology; interregional grant from all health regions in Norway; NordForsk [70945]; Regionernes Medicinpulje, Denmark [14/217]; Stockholm County Council, SwedenStockholm County Council [20100490]; Swedish Medical Research CouncilSwedish Medical Research Council (SMRC) [C0634901, D0342301, 2015-00891_5]; Swedish Rheumatism Association; Research Fund of University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland [A2015017]