Search

Purpose Many studies have shown that the prognosis of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is better than that of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). However, both disorders exhibit different prognoses according to molecular subtype, and the prognosis of ILC subtypes might depend on their hormone receptor positivity rate. This study clarified the prognosis of ILC and IDC in each subtype and examined the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in luminal ILC.Methods We planned the analysis using data from the Breast Cancer Registry in Japan. Because it was presumed that there are differences in characteristics between ILC and IDC, we created matched cohorts using exact matching to compare their prognoses. We compared the prognosis of ILC and IDC for each subtype. We also compared the prognosis of luminal ILC between the CT and non-CT groups.Results For all subtypes, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of ILC were poorer than those of IDC. In the analysis by each subtype, no statistically significant difference was found in DFS and OS in luminal human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), HER2, and triple-negative cohorts; however, luminal ILC had significantly poorer DFS and OS than luminal IDC. The CT effects on the prognosis of luminal ILC were greater in more advanced cases.Conclusion Luminal ILC had a poorer prognosis than luminal IDC, contributing to the worse prognosis of ILC than that of IDC in the overall cohort. Different therapeutic approaches from luminal IDC are essential for a better prognosis of luminal ILC.

Background Elucidating the unique immunoregulatory mechanisms in breast cancer microenvironment may help develop new therapeutic strategies. Some studies have suggested that hormone receptors also have immune regulatory functions, but their mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we have comprehensively analyzed the relationship between the expressions of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and androgen receptors (AR), and the immunological profile in breast cancer. Methods Using publicly available gene expression profile datasets, METABRIC and SCAN-B, the associations between the expressions of hormone receptors and the immune cell compositions in breast cancer tissue, estimated by CIBERSORTx algorithm, were analyzed. We histologically evaluated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (hTIL), PD-L1 (hPD-L1) expression, and the infiltration of 11 types of immune cells by flow cytometry (FCM) for 45 breast cancer tissue samples. The relationships between them and the expressions of ER, PgR, and AR of tumor tissues, evaluated immunohistochemically, were analyzed. Results Expressions of ESR1, PGR, and AR were negatively correlated with overall immune composition. Expressions of ER and AR, but not that of PgR, were inversely associated with hTIL and hPD-L1 expression. FCM analysis showed that the expressions of ER and AR, but not that of PgR, were associated with decreased total leukocyte infiltration. Both CIBERSORTx and FCM analysis showed that ER expression was associated with reduced infiltration of macrophages and CD4+ T cells and that of AR with reduced macrophage infiltration. Conclusion Hormone receptor expression correlates with specific immunological profiles in the breast cancer microenvironment both at the gene and protein expression levels.

Background. A better understanding of tumor immunology can facilitate the development of new treatment strategies for various malignancies. Histologically assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (hTILs) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (hPD-L1) have been established as prognostic or predictive biomarkers in certain subsets of breast cancer. However, the complexity of multiple types of immune cells is not fully understood. In this study, the immune cell fractions in breast cancer tissue and blood were evaluated to analyze their association with hTILs and hPD-L1. Methods. In total, 45 tumor and 18 blood samples were collected from breast cancer patients. The total leukocyte counts, proportions of 11 types of immune cells in the samples, and PD-L1 expression in each fraction were evaluated using multicolor flow cytometry for both the tumor and blood samples. The hTILs and hPD-L1 were evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry respectively. Results. The immune cell composition of the blood showed a partial correlation with that of the tumor tissue; however, no significant association was found between the blood immune cell compositions and hTIL or hPD-L1 expression. A higher hTIL was associated with increased leukocyte infiltration as well as a higher proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and lower proportion of natural killer cells and natural killer T cells. PD-L1 was highly expressed in the monocyte/macrophage (Mo/Mφ), nonclassical monocyte (CD16+ Mo), myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC), dendritic cell (DC), and myeloid dendritic cell (mDC) fractions in the tumor tissues. hPD-L1 positivity was associated with increased leukocyte infiltration in the tumor tissues and PD-L1 expression in Mo/Mφ, CD16+ Mo, MDSC, DC, and mDC fractions. Conclusion. There was a partial correlation in the composition of immune cells at the tumor site and that in the peripheral blood. A high proportion of hTILs reflects not only higher immune cell infiltration but also differences in the immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. Non-B-cell antigen-presenting cell fractions such as Mo/Mφ, CD16+ Mo, MDSC, DC, and mDC fractions are involved primarily in the PD-L1 pathway in the breast cancer microenvironments.

Background: The Oral Care BC-trial reported that professional oral care (POC) reduces the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE). However, the effect of POC on clinical response among patients receiving EVE and EXE was not established. We compared outcomes for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received POC to those who had not, and evaluated clinical prognostic factors. All patients simultaneously received EVE and EXE. Methods: Between May 2015 and Dec 2017, 174 eligible patients were enrolled in the Oral Care-BC trial. The primary endpoint was the comparative incidence of grade 1 or worse oral mucositis, as evaluated for both the groups over 8 weeks by an oncologist. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data were collected after a follow-up period of 13.9 months. Results: There were no significant differences in PFS between the POC and Control Groups (P = 0.801). A BMI < 25 mg/m2 and non-visceral metastasis were associated with longer PFS (P = 0.018 and P = 0.003, respectively) and the use of bone modifying agents (BMA) was associated with shorter PFS (P = 0.028). The PFS and OS between the POC and control groups were not significantly different in the Oral-Care BC trial. Conclusions: POC did not influence the prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with non-visceral metastasis, a BMI < 25 mg/m2, and who did not receive BMA while receiving EVE and EXE may have better prognoses.Trial registration: The study protocol was registered online at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID 000016109), on January 5, 2015 and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02376985).

Background: The Oral Care BC-trial reported that professional oral care (POC) reduces the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE). However, the effect of POC on clinical response among patients receiving EVE and EXE was not established. We compared outcomes for estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients that received POC to those that had not and evaluated clinical prognostic factors. All patients simultaneously received EVE and EXE. Methods: Between May 2015 and Dec 2017, 174 eligible patients were enrolled in the Oral Care-BC trial. The primary endpoint was the comparative incidence of grade 1 or worse oral mucositis, as evaluated by an oncologist over 8 weeks between groups. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data were collected after a follow-up period of 13.9 months. Results: There were no significant differences in PFS between the POC and Control Groups ( P = 0.801). A BMI < 25 mg/m 2 and non-visceral metastasis were associated with longer PFS ( P = 0.018 and P = 0.003, respectively) and the use of bone modifying agents (BMA) was associated with shorter PFS ( P = 0.028). The PFS and OS between the POC and control groups were not significantly different in the Oral-Care BC trial. Conclusions: POC did not influence the prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with non-visceral metastasis, a BMI < 25 mg/m 2 , and who did not receive BMA while receiving EVE and EXE may have better prognoses. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered online at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID 000016109), on January 5, 2015 and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02376985).