Search

The study compared changes in strength and regional muscle hypertrophy between different ranges of motion (ROM) in the knee extension exercise. Forty-five untrained women were randomized to either a control group or to perform the exercise in one of the following 4 groups (0°=extended knee): Full ROM (FULL ROM : 100°-30° of knee flexion); Initial Partial ROM (INITIAL ROM : 100°-65°); Final Partial ROM (FINAL ROM : 65°-30°); Varied ROM (VAR ROM : daily alternation between the ROM of INITIAL ROM and FINAL ROM ). Pre- and post-training assessments included one repetition maximum (1RM) testing in the ROM corresponding to the initial, final and full ROM, and measurement of cross-sectional areas of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis muscles at 40%, 50%, 60% and 70% of femur length in regard to regional muscle hypertrophy. Results showed that the INITIAL ROM group presented a greater relative increase than all groups at 70%, and at 50% and 60% the increases were greater than FINAL ROM , FULL ROM , and non-training control (CON) groups. Moreover, FINAL ROM group presented similar changes compared to the CON group at 60% and 70%. In regard to 1RM, FINAL ROM and INITIAL ROM groups presented greater relative increases at the ROM trained, and no group showed greater increases than VAR ROM or INITIAL ROM , regardless the ROM tested. In conclusion, partial ROM training in the initial phase of the knee extension exercise promoted greater relative hypertrophy in certain muscle regions than training in other ROM configurations, and no group promoted a greater 1RM increase than VAR ROM group, which showed similar 1RM increases in the different ROMs tested.

This study investigated the impact of performing two equalized resistance training (RT) protocols for 10 weeks that differ only by repetition duration and number in the force-position and EMG-position relationship. Participants performed an equalized (36 s of time under tension; 3-4 sets; 3 min between sets; 50-55% of one-repetition maximum; 3× week) RT intervention on the bench press and the only different change between protocols was repetition number (RN; 12 vs.6) or duration (RD; 3 s vs. 6 s). Two experimental groups (RN 12 RD 3 , n  = 12; and RN 6 RD 6 , n  = 12) performed the RT, while one group was the control (Control, n  = 11). Maximal isometric contractions at 10%, 50% and 90% of total bench press range of motion were performed pre- and post-RT, while electromyography was recorded. It demonstrated an increase in isometric force (+14% to 24%, P  < 0.001) shifting up the force-position relationship of the training groups after RT, although no difference was between training groups compared to the Control. Neuromuscular activation from pectoralis major presented an increase after training for both RT groups (+44%; P  < 0.001) compared to the Control. However, although not significantly different, triceps brachii also presented an increase depending on the protocol (+25%). In conclusion, 10 weeks of an equalized RT with longer RN and shorter RD (or opposite) similarly increases the ability to produce maximal isometric force during the bench exercise across different angles, while neuromuscular activation of the pectoralis major partially explained the shift-up of the force-position relationship after training.

This study determined the time-course of recovery after resistance training (RT) sessions and the association between changes in performance with changes in biomechanical, physiological and perceptual parameters. After a 4-week familiarization period, 14 resistance-trained males performed 3 experimental conditions, each one including 2 sessions with a recovery interval of 24, 48 h or 72 h, in a randomized order. RT sessions consisted of 5 sets of 8-10RM on squat and leg press exercises. The resistance was equal for the 2 sessions of each condition and repetitions were performed until concentric failure. Volume load (VL) and first set volume load (FSVL) were compared between sessions. Tests before each session included countermovement jump (CMJ), maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), creatine kinase (CK) and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). (2 × 3) ANOVA with effect sizes (ES) assessed the time-course of recovery and Kendall test the correlation between variables ( α  = 0.05). Significant interaction was observed for all variables, except for CK, where a condition main effect occurred. Comparisons between post and pre-intervals showed VL ( p  = 0.011;ES = -0.90) decreased for 24 h condition, while FSVL remained decreased for 48 h ( p  = 0.031;ES = -0.63) and DOMS increased ( p  = 0.001;ES = 3.52). CMJ ( p  = 0.025;ES = 0.25) and MVIC ( p  = 0.031;ES = 0.14) performance increased at 72 h. FSVL ( r  = 0.424), CMJ ( r  = 0.439), MVIC ( r  = 0.389) and DOMS ( r  = -0.327) were significantly correlated with VL ( p  < 0.05). Time-course of VL showed the necessity of at least 48 h for the reestablishment of performance, though better perceptual responses were evident at 72h. Thus, both recovery intervals may be beneficial after lower-limbs RT until concentric failure, though chronic effects still need to be investigated.