Search

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the association between the serum sclerostin, the coronary artery calcification (CAC), and patient outcomes in maintenance dialysis patients. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 65 maintenance dialysis patients in 2014, including 39 patients on peritoneal dialysis and 26 on hemodialysis, and followed up for 5 years. Parameters of mineral metabolism including bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, fibroblast growth factor 23, sclerostin, and other biochemical factors were determined at the baseline. Meanwhile, the CAC score was analyzed by cardiac computed tomography. Results: Serum sclerostin in hemodialysis patients was significantly higher than that in peritoneal dialysis patients (632.35 ± 369.18 vs. 228.85 ± 188.92, p < 0.001). The patients with CAC were older, receiving hemodialysis, lower Kt/V, and had longer dialysis vintage, as well as higher levels of serum 25-(OH)-vit D and sclerostin. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age and lower Kt/V were risk factors for CAC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for prediction of CAC by sclerostin was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.605–0.878, p = 0.03), and the cutoff value of sclerostin is 217.55 pg/mL with the sensitivity 0.829 and specificity 0.619. After 5 years of follow-up, 51 patients survived. The patients in the survival group had significantly lower age, sclerostin levels, and low CAC scores than the nonsurvival group. Old age (≥60 years, p < 0.001) and high CAC score (≥50 Agatston unit, p = 0.031) were significant risk factors for the patient survival. Conclusions: Sclerostin is significantly elevated in dialysis patients with CAC. But sclerostin is not a risk factor for CAC. After 5 years of follow-up, patients in the survival group are younger and have lower sclerostin levels and CAC scores. But sclerostin levels are not independent risk factors for high mortality in dialysis patients.

Background/Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) plus low-dose dalteparin in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). Methods: Patients requiring pre-dilution CVVH at 4 l/h were randomly assigned to group A (RCA only), group B (normal-dose dalteparin anticoagulation only) or group C (RCA plus low-dose dalteparin). The primary endpoint was filter runtime and the secondary endpoints were premature clotting of the filter and anticoagulation-related side effects. Results: Fifty-three patients completed the study. The mean filter runtime was significantly longer in group C (40.4 ± 30.9 h) than those in group A (21.2 ± 13.5 h, p = 0.006) and group B (25.1 ± 24.0 h, p = 0.040). The rate of premature clotting, new onset of bleeding, hypocalcemia and metabolic acidosis did not differ significantly in three groups. Conclusions: RCA plus low-dose dalteparin prolonged filter runtime compared with RCA only or normal-dose dalteparin only without increasing the incidence of anticoagulation-related complications.

Background/Aims: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a rescue therapy for patients with type 1 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) with poor prognoses. However, the optimal timing for initiation and cessation of RRT remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of initiation and cessation of RRT for patients with type 1 CRS. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, patients with refractory type 1 CRS receiving RRT were divided into 3 groups according to weaning from RRT and death within 90 days. Baseline characteristics, underlying heart disease, comorbidities, drug use before RRT, indicators of RRT initiation, and prognosis were compared between the 3 groups. Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, which included 27 males and 25 females with a mean age of 70.7 ± 16.1 years and a 90-day mortality rate of 65.4%. The mean urine output before RRT initiation was 800 mL/ 24 h in the RRT-independent group, 650 mL/24 h in the RRT-dependent group, and 345 mL/ 24 h in the death group (p = 0.021). Additionally, there were obvious differences in fluid balance between the 3 groups (167, 250, and 1,270 mL, respectively, p = 0.016). Patients could be successfully weaned from RRT when urine output was >880 mL and fluid balance volume was Conclusion: The mean fluid balance of survivors was remarkably less than that of the death group at RRT initiation. RRT termination can be considered when urine output is >880 mL/24 h and volume balance is