1. Rifaximin-Based Regimens for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A Pilot Study
- Author
-
Antonio Gasbarrini, Veronica Ojetti, Marcello Candelli, Giovanni Gasbarrini, Maurizio Gabrielli, Giovanni Cammarota, Alessia Cazzato, R. Finizio, Ernesto Cristiano Lauritano, Maria Assunta Zocco, Michele Santoro, and Enrico Celestino Nista
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,biology ,Poor compliance ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,Follow up studies ,macromolecular substances ,General Medicine ,Helicobacter pylori ,biology.organism_classification ,law.invention ,Rifaximin ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Pharmacotherapy ,Randomized controlled trial ,chemistry ,Levofloxacin ,law ,Clarithromycin ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background: Triple therapy is the treatment of choice for Helicobacter pylori-infected patients with an eradication rate ranging from 70 to 85%. Poor compliance and antibiotic resistance are the main causes of treatment failure. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of rifaximin, a poorly absorbed antibiotic, for H. pylori eradication. Methods: We enrolled 48 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients affected. They were randomized to receive two 7-day rifaximin-based triple therapies: rifaximin tablets 400 mg t.i.d., esomeprazole 40 mg o.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (CRE) or levofloxacin 500 mg o.d. (LRE). H. pylori eradication was assessed using a 13C-urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Treatment compliance and the incidence of side effects were also evaluated. Results: No dropouts were observed. The eradication rate both on intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis did not show significant differences between groups: 58% (14/24 patients) in group 1 and 42% (10/24 patients) in group 2 (p = 0.24, OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.62–6.18). No significant differences in patients’ compliance and incidence of side effects were found between groups. Conclusions: Rifaximin-based therapy showed optimal compliance but a limited eradication rate compared to standard first-line treatment. Further investigations are needed to evaluate different dosages and combinations.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF