Search

Background: Smoking status has not been shown to have a significant effect on 30-day mortality after potentially curative resectional surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer, and this is reflected in the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the United Kingdom., Methods: A validated prospective thoracic surgery database of consecutive patients undergoing potentially curative resection at a single institution was analyzed. Univariate and propensity analyses of 30-day mortality were performed., Results: Univariate analysis identified 30-day mortality as significantly lower in current smokers (n = 852, 2.6%) than ex-smokers (n = 1587, 4.9%; p < 0.001). Propensity 1:1 matching of male patients resulted in 727 current smokers being matched to 727 ex-smokers. The overall balance test (χ(2 )= 6.1, degrees of freedom = 8, p = 0.6), indicated a good match. After propensity matching, the mortality rate was significantly higher in current smokers (p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Current smokers and ex-smokers are statistically different with regard to risk factors for death. This results in a skewed population of current and ex-smokers undergoing resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. Development of a risk model for 30-day mortality revealed that current smokers have a lower predicted 30-day mortality than ex-smokers, a finding that is counterintuitive. Propensity matching balanced the current and ex-smoker groups to correct for group differences. Analysis after propensity matching identified current smoking as a significant factor determining 30-day mortality., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

Aim: We aimed to determine whether metastatic index is a factor determining long-term survival in patients undergoing curative resection for non-small-cell lung cancer., Methods: There were 2695 consecutive pulmonary resections performed between October 2001 and September 2011 in our institution; 1795 were potentially curative resections for non-small-cell lung cancer with bronchial margin length data available. Benchmarking against the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer data set was performed. Cox multivariate analysis was undertaken. Metastatic index was defined as N stage× bronchial resection margin length., Results: Benchmarking failed to reveal any significant differences between our data and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer data set. Univariate analysis identified metastatic index as a significant factor determining long-term survival (p = 0.04). Cox regression demonstrated that metastatic index (hazard ratio 1.29, p = 0.0002), age (hazard ratio 1.02, p < 0.0001), body mass index (hazard ratio 0.98, p = 0.006), female sex (hazard ratio 0.65, p < 0.0001), T1 stage (hazard ratio 0.67, p < 0.0001), T2 stage (hazard ratio 2.13, p < 0.0001), T3 stage (hazard ratio 1.59, p = 0.03), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (hazard ratio 0.70, p < 0.0001), pneumonectomy (hazard ratio 1.43, p = 0.001), histology subtype adenosquamous (hazard ratio 3.77, p = 0.01) and squamous (hazard ratio 0.83, p = 0.03) were all significant determinants of long-term survival., Conclusion: Metastatic index is a significant factor determining long-term survival in patents with adenocarcinoma undergoing potentially curative surgery with a lobectomy., (© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Background: Intestinal ischemia is associated with a very high mortality rate. We combined the principles of Virchow's triad to produce preoperative and postoperative models for the development of intestinal ischemia., Methods: A single institutional study was undertaken involving 18,325 consecutive patients from April 1997 to March 2012. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed., Results: Mortality was 87% in 91 patients who developed bowel ischemia. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age, peripheral vascular disease, intraaortic balloon pump support, female sex, and preexisting renal failure were significant determinates of intestinal ischemia preoperatively. Logistic regression demonstrated that age, peripheral vascular disease, creatine kinase-MB level, reoperation for bleeding, and blood product usage were significant determinates of intestinal ischemia postoperatively., Conclusions: Potentially remedial causes of intestinal ischemia include blood product usage, reoperation for bleeding, and creatine kinase-MB release. Age, female sex, peripheral vascular disease, intraaortic balloon pump usage, and preexisting renal failure are fixed risk factors. Despite the continuing trend of reduced blood product usage in the field of cardiac surgery, the increase in patients' risk factors will mean that incidences of intestinal ischemia may increase in the future., (© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Background: Pneumonectomy is associated with a higher operative mortality rate and worse 5-year survival after resection for non-small-cell lung cancer, compared to lobectomy. We investigated whether pneumonectomy is an independent risk factor for hospital mortality and poor long-term survival, after risk factor adjustment., Methods: We analyzed a prospectively validated thoracic surgery database. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for patients who had undergone lobectomy (n = 1484) or pneumonectomy (n = 266). Logistic and Cox multivariate regression analysis and propensity matching were performed on hospital mortality and long-term survival data., Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated that pneumonectomy was a significant risk factor for hospital death (p = 0.02) and long-term survival (p < 0.001). Logistic regression failed to demonstrate pneumonectomy as a risk factor for hospital mortality. Cox regression analysis failed to identify pneumonectomy as a statistically significant risk factor. Propensity analysis (n = 266 in each group with 1:1 matching) demonstrated that pneumonectomy was not associated with hospital mortality (p = 0.37) or poorer long-term survival (p = 0.19) compared to lobectomy., Conclusion: Pneumonectomy is not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality or long-term survival, after adjustment for confounding factors.

Background: Lobectomy remains the gold standard with regard to potentially curative resection of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. We aimed to investigate whether there is a survival difference in stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo lobectomy compared to a wedge resection., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective database of 1283 patients who had potentially curative resection for stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer. Only patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous or adenosquamous carcinoma were included. We benchmarked our 5-year survival against the 6th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer results. Three techniques were used to assess the effect of a lobectomy compared to a wedge resection with regard to long-term survival: Cox multivariate regression analysis, neuronal network analysis, and propensity matching., Results: Benchmarking failed to reveal any significant difference compared to the 6th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer results. Crude analysis demonstrated superiority of lobectomy compared to wedge resection, p = 0.02. Cox regression analysis confirmed that age, body mass index, female sex, being a current smoker, tumor diameter, and preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s were all significant factors determining long-term survival. Wedge resection was not a significant factor. Neuronal network analysis concurred with the Cox regression analysis. Propensity matching with 1:1 matching demonstrated that wedge resections was not inferior to a lobectomy, p = 0.10., Conclusions: Cox regression analysis, neuronal network analysis, and propensity matching in stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer demonstrate no difference in long-term survival after wedge resection compared to lobectomy.

Clear resection margins are necessary for long-term survival of patients undergoing surgical resection. We aimed to determine whether bronchial resection margin is a factor determining long-term survival in patients undergoing R0 resections for non-small-cell lung cancer. There were 2695 consecutive pulmonary resections performed between October 2001 and September 2011 in our institution; 1795 were R0 resections for non-small-cell lung cancer and bronchial margin length data were available. Benchmarking against the 7th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer dataset was performed. Cox multivariate and neuronal network analysis was undertaken. Benchmarking failed to reveal any significant differences between our data and the 7th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer dataset. Cox regression demonstrated that age (p<0.001), sex (p<0.0001), body mass index (p=0.002), T1 stage (p=0.0002), T3 stage (p<0.0001), N1 stage (p<0.001), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (p<0.0001), squamous histology (p=0.009), mixed adenosquamous histology (p=0.008), and pneumonectomy (p=0.01) were all significant determinants of long-term survival, but bronchial resection margin was not. Neuronal network analysis confirmed these findings. Bronchial resection margin length has no impact on long-term survival.

This study was undertaken to determine whether the Framingham cardiovascular risk prediction model can identify patients who will have reduced 5-year survival after resection for primary lung cancer. The Framingham risk model for predicting cardiovascular death rates in a 5-year period was calculated for 1,981 patients undergoing resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine a cutoff with regard to Framingham risk, and this was utilized to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves for stages I, II, and III. Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors significantly affecting long-term survival. The Framingham risk model predicted that 0.015% to 26.7 % (mean, 5.2%) of our patients would die over a 5-year period. Univariate analysis revealed the Framingham score as being significant for stages I and II, but not III. Cox regression analysis demonstrated age, body mass index, pneumonectomy, stage I, stage III, stage IV, and Framingham score were all significant determinants of 5-year survival. Framingham-based cardiovascular risk prediction in patients undergoing resection for non-small-cell lung cancer stages I and II defined a group with significantly worse 5-year survival.