Search

Approximately 40-50% of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair require left subclavian artery coverage for adequate proximal landing zone. Many of these patients undergo left subclavian artery revascularisation. However, outcomes data for left subclavian artery revascularisation in the context of thoracic endovascular aortic repair remain limited. In this study, 70 left subclavian artery revascularisation procedures, performed on thoracic endovascular aortic repair patients at a tertiary hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. Particular emphasis was placed on revascularisation-related outcomes during staging interval between revascularisation and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Forty-six (66%) carotid-subclavian bypass, 17 (24%) carotid-carotid-subclavian bypass and 7 (10%) aorto-inominate-carotid-subclavian bypass procedures were performed. There were no strokes or mortalities following left subclavian artery revascularisation procedures alone. Three (10%) minor complications occurred including a seroma, a haematoma and a temporary neuropraxia. Separation of complications following left subclavian artery revascularisation from those of the associated thoracic endovascular aortic repair can be difficult. Early outcomes data from patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularisation in isolation indicate that the procedure is safe with low complication rates.

Objectives: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease. We tested the hypothesis that there is a consensus regarding the treatment of acute DVT among clinicians experienced in DVT management., Method: A Delphi consensus approach was used to gather expert opinion regarding attitudes towards the treatment of acute proximal DVT and management of specific cases. Strength of preference for various treatment strategies across a number of case scenarios was quantified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the influence of various factors on treatment modality selected., Results: Respondents strongly agreed that DVT was a significant health problem and that further research was a priority. A multidisciplinary team approach with access to various treatment strategies was encouraged. Pregnancy and recent surgery independently predicted preference for medical treatment, whereas proximal DVT and May-Thurner syndrome were associated with interventional strategies., Conclusion: Acute proximal DVT is a significant health problem for which a variety of treatments are available. This study demonstrates that no consensus exists as to the optimum strategy for certain patient groups. Trends in opinion based on local experience and case-series exist, but the results of ongoing randomized trials will ultimately inform best practice.

The objectives of this study were to compare the 1-year patency of superficial femoral artery (SFA) stent placement with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone and to attempt to define the role of stents in arterial occlusive disease. Literature searches of the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases identified relevant articles, which were split into two subgroups: those containing case-controlled matches for stenting and PTA and those considering only stent placement. The review conformed to the QUORUM statement. One-year patency rates were 219 of 383 (57%) in the stented group and 319 of 607 (53%) in the PTA group for matched cases (odds ratio 1.206 [95% CI 0.932-1.559; p = .115]). The patency of stents deployed secondarily was 554 of 909 (61%). The combined 1-year patency of primary and secondary SFA stents for matched and unmatched case series was 816 of 1,282 (64%). One-year patency rates following stent placement or PTA alone in well-matched patient groups demonstrated no significant difference. This would suggest that the routine use of primary SFA stenting should be undertaken only in selected cases and should mainly be used in "bailout" situations or for complex lesions where surgery is precluded. However, the studies used displayed a high degree of heterogeneity, and some used stent technology that is now considered obsolete. Ongoing randomized controlled trials will provide a more definitive answer to this important problem.

Current evidence suggests that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed within 2 weeks of symptoms produces better long-term results than if it is delayed. Urgent endarterectomy following unstable presentations such as crescendo transient ischemic attack (cTIA) or progressive stroke has been associated with variable results. The evidence for this treatment strategy required reviewing. A systematic review of articles related to urgent CEA between 1980 and 2008 was performed. For cTIA, there was an odds ratio of 5.6 (95% confidence interval 3.3-9.7, p < or = .0001) for combined stroke or death compared with surgery for "standard" indications. For unstable stroke, the odds ratio was 5.5 (95% confidence interval 3.1-9.3, p < or = .0001). Patients with unstable neurologic presentations are at higher risk of complications if operated on urgently. Clearer definitions would help more precise patient selection to avoid inadvertently operating on patients with an unacceptably high risk of poor outcome.