1. How accurate are metaperceptions of sexism? Evidence for the illusion of antagonism between hostile and benevolent sexism.
- Author
-
Rudman, Laurie A. and Fetterolf, Janell C.
- Subjects
- *
SEXISM , *ANTAGONISM (Ecology) , *ETHNICITY , *SOCIAL perception , *INTERGROUP relations , *GENDER , *GROUP identity - Abstract
In the first examination of the accuracy of metaperceptions of sexism among White, Asian, and Black women and men (N = 308), results showed that regardless of ethnicity, both genders were similarly inaccurate, but in opposing ways. Women overestimated men’s hostile sexism (HS) and underestimated men’s benevolent sexism (BS), whereas men overestimated women’s BS and underestimated women’s HS. Further, metaperceptions of HS were negatively related to metaperceptions of BS, for both genders. Individual differences in sexism informed metaperceptions only for men (not women). In concert, the findings support an illusion of antagonism between HS and BS. Viewing HS and BS as oppositional is an illusion because, cross-culturally, they are positively correlated in men and women alike (e.g., Glick et al., 2000), and both forms of sexism reinforce the gender hierarchy (Rudman & Glick, 2008). Therefore, disarming the illusion of antagonism is an overlooked key to advancing gender equality. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF