Search

Background: Limited studies have compared graft-glenoid apposition and glenoid augmentation area between the Latarjet procedure and distal clavicle graft in glenohumeral stabilization. Additionally, preoperative planning is typically performed using computed tomography (CT), and few studies have used 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reformations to assess graft dimensions. Purpose: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to compare bony apposition, glenoid augmentation, and graft width among coracoid and distal clavicle bony augmentation techniques and (2) to determine the viability of 3D MRI to assess bone graft dimensions. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 24 patients with recurrent glenohumeral instability and bone loss were included in this study. 3D CT and 3D MRI reformations were utilized to measure pertinent dimensions for 5 orientations of coracoid and distal clavicle autografts: (1) standard Latarjet procedure (SLJ), (2) congruent arc Latarjet procedure (CLJ), (3) distal clavicle attached by its posterior surface (DCP), (4) distal clavicle attached by its inferior surface (DCI), and (5) distal clavicle attached by its resected end (DCR). Glenoid augmentation was defined as the graft surface area contributing to the glenoid. Bone-on-bone apposition was defined as the graft-glenoid contact area for bone healing potential, and graft width was pertinent for fixation technique. Glenoid bone loss ranged from 0% to 34%. Paired t tests were used to compare graft sizes between patients and compare 3D CT versus 3D MRI measurements. Results: The CLJ had the largest graft surface area (mean, 318.41 ± 74.44 mm2), while the SLJ displayed the most bone-on-bone apposition (mean, 318.41 ± 74.44 mm2). The DCI had the largest graft width (mean, 20.62 ± 3.93 mm). Paired t tests revealed no significant differences between the Latarjet techniques, whereas distal clavicle grafts varied significantly with orientation. All 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements were within 1 mm of each other, and only 2 demonstrated a statistically significant difference (coracoid width: 13.03 vs 13.98 mm, respectively [ P = .010]; distal clavicle thickness: 9.69 vs 10.77 mm, respectively [ P = .002]). 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements demonstrated a strong positive correlation ( r > 0.6 and P < .001 for all dimensions). Conclusion: Glenoid augmentation, bony apposition, and graft width varied with coracoid or distal clavicle graft type and orientation. Differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI were small and likely not clinically significant. Clinical Relevance: 3D MRI is a viable method for preoperative planning and graft selection in glenoid bone loss.

Context: A strict rehabilitation protocol is traditionally followed after microfracture, including weightbearing restrictions for 2 to 6 weeks. However, such restrictions pose significant disability, especially in a patient population that is younger and more active. Evidence Acquisition: An extensive literature review was performed through PubMed and Google Scholar of all studies through December 2018 related to microfracture, including biomechanical, basic science, and clinical studies. For inclusion, clinical studies had to report weightbearing status and outcomes with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Results: Review of biomechanical and biology studies suggest new forming repair tissue is protected from shear forces of knee joint loading by the cartilaginous margins of the defect. This margin acts as a shoulder to maintain axial height and allow for tissue remodeling up to at least 12 months after surgery, well beyond current weight bearing restriction trends. A retrospective case-control study showed that weightbearing status postoperatively had no effect on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent microfracture for small chondral (2) defects. In fact, 1 survey showed that many orthopaedic surgeons currently do not restrict weightbearing after microfracture. Conclusion: This clinical literature review suggests that weightbearing restrictions may not be required after microfracture for isolated tibiofemoral chondral lesions of the knee. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy: C.

Background: Psychological distress after orthopaedic surgery can lead to worse outcomes, including higher levels of disability and pain and lower quality of life. The 10-item Optimal Screening for Prediction for Referral and Outcome–Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) survey screens for multiple psychological constructs relevant to recovery from orthopaedic injury and may be useful to preoperatively identify patients who may require further psychological assessment and possible intervention after surgery. Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine the association between the OSPRO-YF and physiological patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It was hypothesized that higher OSPRO-YF scores (indicating worse psychological distress) would be associated with worse PRO scores at time of return to sport. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study evaluated 107 patients at a single, academic health center who were assessed at a sports orthopaedics clinic and ultimately treated surgically for injuries to the knee, shoulder, foot, or ankle. Preoperatively, patients completed the OSPRO-YF survey as well as the following PRO measures: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, numeric rating scale for pain; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form for patients with shoulder injuries, the International Knee Documentation Committee score (for patients with knee injuries), and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM; for patients with foot or ankle injuries). At the time of anticipated full recovery and/or return to sport, patients again completed the same PRO surveys. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between total OSPRO-YF score at baseline and PRO scores at the time of functional recovery. Results: The baseline OSPRO-YF score predicted postoperative PROMIS Physical Function and FAAM Sports scores only. A 1-unit increase in the OSPRO-YF was associated with a 0.55-point reduction in PROMIS Physical Function (95% CI, –1.05 to –0.04; P = .033) indicating worse outcomes. Among patients who underwent ankle surgery, a 1-unit increase in OSPRO-YF was associated with a 6.45-point reduction in FAAM Sports (95% CI, –12.0 to –0.87; P = .023). Conclusion: The study findings demonstrated that the OSPRO-YF survey predicts certain long-term PRO scores at the time of expected return to sport, independent of baseline scores.

Background: Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is a common injury pattern and accounts for 20% of all ligamentous knee injuries. Despite advancements in surgical technique, there is no up-to-date consensus regarding the superiority of nonoperative versus operative management in higher-grade MCL tears of combined ACL-MCL injuries. Purpose: To interpret recent literature on treatment options and to provide an updated evidence-based approach for management of combined ACL-MCL knee injuries. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We performed a systematic review on outcomes following treatment of concomitant ACL and MCL injuries. A computerized search was conducted in PubMed, Embase.com , and Scopus.com . Authors independently assessed eligible studies and screened titles and abstracts. Articles reporting on patients with concomitant ACL and MCL injuries with or without concomitant procedures were included. Data regarding study design, sample size, patient age and sex, length of follow-up, timing of surgery, indications, surgical methods, concomitant procedures, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and functional outcomes, including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and range of motion, were estimated via meta-analysis and compared statistically by surgical approach. Results: In total, 18 studies were included in the systematic review with level 1 to level 4 evidence, with a total of 1,534 cases, were included in the systematic review. Of these, 16 studies with sufficient statistical reporting including 997 cases with sufficient follow-up were included in meta-analysis. Three different approaches to combined ACL-MCL injuries were identified: ACL reconstruction with (1) nonoperative MCL, (2) MCL repair, and (3) MCL reconstruction. There was no statistical difference between nonoperative versus surgically managed MCL injuries for PROs, range of motion at final follow up, or quadriceps strength. Conclusion: Reconstruction of combined injury in a delayed fashion facilitates return of range of motion and may allow time for low-grade MCL tears to heal. If residual valgus or anteromedial rotatory laxity remains after a period of rehabilitation, then concomitant surgical management of ACL and MCL injuries is warranted. Avulsion MCL injuries and Stener-type lesions may benefit from early repair techniques.

Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of operative versus nonoperative management for Achilles tendon ruptures, as multiple randomized controlled trials conducted since the advent of early mobilization protocols have found outcomes for these 2 interventions to be more similar than were previously held. Purpose: To use a large national database to (1) compare reoperation and complication rates between operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures and (2) evaluate trends in treatment and cost over time. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify an unmatched cohort of 31,515 patients who sustained primary Achilles tendon ruptures between 2007 and 2015. Patients were stratified into operative and nonoperative treatment groups, and a propensity score—a matching algorithm—was used to establish a matched cohort of 17,996 patients (n = 8993 per treatment group). Reoperation rates, complications, and aggregate treatment costs were compared between groups with an alpha level of .05. A number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated from the absolute risk difference in complications between cohorts. Results: The operative cohort experienced a significantly larger total number of complications within 30 days of injury (1026 vs 917; P = .0088). The absolute increase in cumulative risk was 1.2% with operative treatment, which resulted in an NNH of 83. Neither 1-year (1.1% [operative] vs 1.3% [nonoperative]; P = .1201) nor 2-year reoperation rates (1.9% [operative] vs 2% [nonoperative]; P = .2810) were significantly different. Operative care was more expensive than nonoperative care at 9 months and 2 years after injury; however, there was no difference in cost between treatments at 5 years. Before matching, the rate of surgical repair for Achilles tendon rupture remained stable, from 69.7% to 71.7% between 2007 and 2015, indicating little change in practice in the United States. Conclusion: Results indicated no differences in reoperation rates between operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Operative management was associated with an increased risk of complications and higher initial costs, which dissipated over time. Between 2007 and 2015 the proportion of Achilles tendon ruptures managed operatively remained similar despite increasing evidence that nonoperative management of Achilles tendon rupture may provide equivalent outcomes.

Background: Patellar instability is a common problem in the active pediatric population. Physeal sparing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using a soft suture anchor for femoral graft fixation has the proposed advantages of diminishing volumetric bony removal from the epiphysis, increasing the margin of safety with respect to notch, trochlear, and/or physeal damage, as well as reducing the risk of thermal damage to the physis during socket reaming. Indications: MPFL reconstruction is indicated in patients with recurrent patellar instability with MPFL tear or attenuation on magnetic resonance imaging or failure of conservative treatment. Physeal sparing techniques are necessary in the pediatric population to prevent growth disturbance and deformities that can lead to significant long-term disability. Technique Description: The patient was placed in supine position. Following examination under anesthesia, diagnostic arthroscopy was performed to assess for patellofemoral chondral defects. The surgical technique required 6 steps: (1) medial patellar dissection, (2) patellar anchor placement with 1.8-mm suture anchors, (3) medial femoral dissection over Schottle’s point, (4) femoral anchor placement using 2.8-mm double loaded anchor, (5) allograft femoral fixation, and (6) allograft patellar fixation. After skin closure, examination under anesthesia was repeated. Results: The patient was weight-bearing as tolerated immediately after surgery, using a brace for the first 6 weeks. Rehabilitation progressed from regaining range of motion, strengthening of the operative extremity, and returning to sport activities. In the senior author’s experience using this technique, there have been no recurrent patellar dislocations and no evidence of growth disturbance or angulation. One patient did find that the graft was prominent over the femoral epicondyle and returned to the operating room for debulking at 9 months postoperatively. Discussion/Conclusion: In conclusion, we propose that physeal sparing MPFL reconstruction using soft anchors for patellar and femoral fixation offers a simple and safe technique with reproducible anatomic graft placement and favorable clinical outcomes. This technique is technically simple and can be easily learned by surgeons familiar with adult MPFL reconstruction techniques. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: The adoption of telehealth visits for physical therapy (PT) has accelerated because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient reception of virtual PT at the outbreak of the pandemic was positive, but it is unclear how telehealth visits compare to in-person visits in the postpandemic era. Purpose: To evaluate utilization trends and patient satisfaction with virtual PT compared with in-person PT during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We identified 59,461 in-person and 2016 telehealth visits at a single physical rehabilitation center between March 2020 and December 2021. Patient socioeconomic and demographic variables, including insurance status, were compared between telehealth users and in-person visitors. A total of 1012 patient satisfaction surveys were available and analyzed using the top-box method. Univariable statistics ( t test or Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests) were used for group comparisons. Results: Overall, telehealth users when compared with in-person visitors were older (median age, 47 vs 42 years, respectively; P < .001), and a higher proportion was female (60.6% vs 54.8%; P < .001), was White (69.7% vs 66.6%; P = .023), spoke English as their primary language (99.2% vs 98.1%; P = .001), and had Medicare insurance (20.3% vs 16.1%; P < .001). Telehealth patients more often lived out-of-county (50.7% vs 45.8%; P < .001) and in small towns rather than in urban areas (1.0% vs 0.3%; P < .001). When we compared telehealth use before and after official reopening of the PT center in September 2020, telehealth users in the postpandemic era had an out-of-county rate of 58.7%, and 68.7% were female. Patient satisfaction survey results demonstrated that telehealth patients compared with in-person patients were less likely to recommend visits to others (75.0% vs 89.1%, respectively; P = .008) and had lower overall assessment of their visits (71.7% vs 88.6%; P = .001). Accordingly, there was a significant reduction in telehealth visits from 2020 to 2021 (from 6.9% to 0.9% of visits; P < .001). Conclusion: We noted a decline in telehealth PT use during the postpandemic era, consistent with reduced patient satisfaction when compared with in-person visits. Telehealth is a useful option for populations with limited time or access to care and may serve a role in a hybrid care model. Further studies on long-term outcomes after telehealth PT are warranted to evaluate its efficacy.

Background: Revision shoulder stabilizations are becoming increasingly common. Returning to play after revision shoulder stabilizations is important to patients. Purpose: To evaluate the return-to-play rate after revision anterior shoulder stabilization using arthroscopic, open, coracoid transfer, or free bone block procedures. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All English-language studies published between 2000 and 2020 that reported on return to play after revision anterior shoulder stabilization were reviewed. Clinical outcomes that were evaluated included rate of overall return to play, level of return to play, and time to return to play. Study quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black quality assessment score. Results: Eighteen studies (1 level 2; 17 level 4; mean Downs and Black score, 10.1/31) on revision anterior shoulder stabilization reported on return to play and met inclusion criteria (7 arthroscopic, 5 open, 3 Latarjet, and 3 bony augmentation), with a total of 564 revision cases (mean age, 27.9 years; 84.1% male). The weighted mean length of follow-up was 52.5 months. The overall weighted rate of return to play was 80.1%. The weighted mean rate of return to play was 84.0% (n = 153) after arthroscopic revision, 91.5% (n = 153) after open revision, 88.1% (n = 149) after Latarjet, and 73.8% (n = 65) after bone augmentation. The weighted mean rate of return to same level of play was 69.7% for arthroscopic revision, 70.0% for open revision, 67.1% for Latarjet revision, and 61.8% after bone block revision. There were 5 studies that reported on time to return to play, with a weighted mean of 7.75 months (4 arthroscopic) and 5.2 months (1 Latarjet). The weighted mean rates of complication (for studies that provided it) were 3.3% after arthroscopic revision (n = 174), 3.5% after open revision (n = 110), 9.3% after Latarjet revision (n = 108), and 45.8% after bone block revision (n = 72). Conclusion: Revision using open stabilization demonstrated the highest return-to-play rate. Revision using Latarjet had the quickest time to return to play but had higher complication rates. When evaluated for return to same level of play, arthroscopic, open, and Latarjet had similar rates, and bone block had lower rates. The choice of an optimal revision shoulder stabilization technique, however, depends on patient goals. Higher-quality studies are needed to compare treatments regarding return to play after revision shoulder stabilization.

Background The purpose of this study was to describe trends in the incidence of open versus arthroscopic management of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) as well as the patients undergoing these procedures in the United States over time. Methods The PearlDiver Patient Records Database was utilized for this study. Cases of PSI and surgery were identified via the appropriate ICD-10-CM and CPT codes. Linear regression and two-sample Student's t-test were used to analyze incidence rates, procedure type, number of instability events, and patient age. Results A total of 5655 patients were identified as having PSI, undergoing a total of 686 capsulorraphies. The incidence of PSI treated surgically increased across the years of the study at a rate of 0.0293 per 100,000 person-years with an incidence in 2019–2020 greater than in 2016–2018 ( p = 0.0151). Patients undergoing arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy were on average younger than those undergoing open capsulorrhaphy ( p = 0.0021). Patients experienced a higher number of posterior instability events before open surgery compared to arthroscopic ( p = 0.0274). Discussion The incidence of surgical treatment of PSI in the United States is steadily rising, with greater than 90% of cases being treated arthroscopically. Those undergoing arthroscopic posterior stabilization are both younger and face fewer instability events prior to surgery.

Background:Treatment of a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation (FTASD) is sensitive to patient preferences. The operative or nonoperative management debate provides an excellent opportunity to learn how surgeons apply patient preferences in treatment decisions.Purpose:To determine how patient preferences (repeat dislocation risk, recovery difficulties, fear of surgery, treatment costs) and surgeon factors influence a surgeon’s treatment plan for FTASD.Study Design:Cross-sectional study.Methods:Eight clinical vignettes of hypothetical patients with FTASD (including age, sex, and activity level) were presented to members of the Magellan Society. A second set of matched vignettes with patient preferences and clinical variables were also presented. The vignettes represented scenarios in which evidence does not favor one treatment over another. Respondents were asked how they would manage each hypothetical case. Respondents also estimated the risk of redislocation for the nonoperative cases for comparison with the published rates. Finally, respondents completed a Likert-scale questionnaire to determine their perceptions on factors influencing their decisions.Results:A total of 103 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey; 48% practiced in an academic hospital; 79% were in practice for 10 years or longer; and 75% had completed a sports medicine fellowship. Patient preferences were the single most important factor influencing treatment recommendation, with activity type and age also important. Just 62% of the surgeon estimates of the risk of redislocation were consistent with the published rates. The inclusion of patient preferences to clinical variables changed treatment recommendations in 62.5% of our hypothetical cases. Respondents rated patient treatment preference as the leading factor in their treatment decision making.Conclusion:Patient preferences were important when deciding the appropriate treatment for FTASD. Respondents were inconsistent when applying evidence in their decision making and estimates of recurrent instability. Decision support tools that deliver patient preferences and personalized evidence-based outcome estimates improve the quality of decision making at the point of care.

Category: Sports; Basic Sciences/Biologics Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmosis injuries are common and frequently occur with deltoid injuries but optimal repair remains controversial. Prior biomechanical studies have demonstrated that 1 and 2 suture buttons are equivalent to screw fixation and that parallel or divergent suture buttons are equivalent to single suture button. Prior studies, however, created constructs with suture buttons within 1cm from each other (2-3cm from joint surface). Additionally, the role of deltoid injury and repair have not been evaluated in conjunction with syndesmosis injury and repair. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a narrow vs spread 2-suture button construct with and without a deltoid repair. Methods: Four matched lower leg specimens (8 total specimens) aged mean 60.2 years (range 57-66 years; 6 females and 2 males; mean BMI 21.1) were tested. Ankle motion under cyclic loading was measured in multiple planes: first in the intact state, following simulated syndesmosis and deltoid injury, then following fixation with 1 of 2 randomly assigned constructs: 2 parallel suture buttons at 2 and 3cm from joint line (narrow); and 2 parallel suture buttons at 1 and 4cm from joint line (spread), and then finally following a deltoid repair with each construct. Each state was tested at a constant 750 N axial compressive force and 5N internal/external torque. Rotation position (degrees) and anterior-posterior displacement (mm) were collected throughout the testing to characterize relative spatial relationships of the tibiofibular articulation using 3D video capture technology. Results: Narrow and spread 2-suture button constructs improved rotation and translation compared to cut state (p0.05). There were no significant differences in rotation or translation between Narrow and Spread constructs (p>0.05). The addition of a deltoid repair did not improve rotation or translation compared to syndesmosis repair with either construct alone (p>0.05). Conclusion: The preliminary results of this study suggest that constructs with suture button placed close together or spread apart during fixation of combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury could improve rotation and translation equally. Additionally, in a combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury, the addition of a deltoid repair to a syndesmosis repair did not strengthen the construct. These findings suggest that repair of syndesmosis alone may be sufficient in combined syndesmosis and deltoid injuries. Additional matched samples will be tested to validate preliminary findings.

Background: The quadrangular (or quadrilateral) space is defined by its anatomical borders and is the passageway for the axillary nerve and posterior circumflex humeral artery (PCHA). Quadrangular space syndrome (QSS) can present due to various compressive pathologies but is commonly seen in overhead athletes. Quadrangular space syndrome can present with neurogenic symptoms including pain and paresthesias, as well as vascular complications from compression of the PCHA including thrombosis, aneurysm formation, and distal emboli. Indications: Surgical decompression of the quadrangular space is indicated for severe neurogenic or vascular compromise in the case of QSS refractory to nonoperative treatment. Technique Description: After appropriate preoperative physical examination findings and trial of nonoperative treatment, including physical therapy and injections, surgical decompression was indicated. The posterior border of the deltoid was marked, and an incision centered over the posterior border of the deltoid lateral to the axillary fold was made. Posterior border of deltoid was identified and retracted, revealing the interval of the teres minor and major. The nerve to the teres minor was identified, protected, and fibrous bands compressing the nerve were released. The nerve to the teres minor was tracked deep to find the axillary nerve. This was identified and fibrous bands around the nerve were decompressed. The circumflex vessels were protected throughout. Following decompression of the nerves, there was free movement of the nerves indicating adequate surgical decompression. Results: Adequate surgical decompression of the axillary nerve and PCHA achieved with resolution of neurogenic symptoms of pain and paresthesias at first postoperative visit. Discussion/Conclusion: Quadrangular space syndrome is a rare disorder, can be difficult to diagnose, and is the cause of significant morbidity, particularly in overhead athletes. If symptoms persist after nonoperative treatment, operative decompression of the quadrangular space may be indicated. Adequate surgical decompression results in relief of neurogenic and vascular symptoms.

Background: Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) may be caused by osteochondritis dissecans, osteochondral fractures, avascular necrosis, or focal arthritic changes. For certain focal cartilage defects, bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been a widely used technique to restore a fibrocartilage substitute overlying the defect. There are various postoperative weightbearing protocols for this procedure, with no single gold standard method. Purpose: To retrospectively review the outcomes of patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy with concomitant BMS to determine outcomes based on postoperative weightbearing status. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy with BMS for OLTs between 2015 and 2018. Patients were placed into 2 cohorts based on postoperative immobilization status: the nonweightbearing (NWB) group and the weightbearing-as-tolerated (WBAT) group. Patient characteristics obtained included age, sex, comorbidities, and etiology of talar pathology. Outcomes included the pain visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), complications, time to first weightbearing, and the method and length of immobilization. Patients who were lost to follow-up before 30 days were excluded. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between cohorts, and the t test was used for continuous variables. Results: A total of 69 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, 18 in the WBAT group and 51 in the NWB group. The mean lesion size was 9.48 × 9.21 mm (range, 3-15 mm × 2-20 mm) for the NWB group and 9.36 × 9.72 mm (range, 5-14 mm × 6-20 mm) for the WBAT group ( P > .05). The VAS scores improved from 4.40 to 0.67 for the WBAT group and from 6.33 to 2.55 for the NWB group, with the difference in final values reaching statistical significance ( P = .0002). Postoperative ROM was not significantly different between the groups. There were 4 repeat operations within the NWB cohort. Conclusion: The surgical management of OLTs can be challenging, and the postoperative weightbearing protocol can be an extra obstacle for the patient to navigate. We found no difference in pain, ROM, or complications when allowing immediate, full WBAT.

Background: Modern techniques for graft choice, preparation, and fixation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction demonstrate excellent longevity and return-to-play rates; however, up to 10% to 18% of cases continue to suffer reruptures, with even higher rates in specific subsets of patients. Indications: Normally, the posterior tibial slope is measured between 7° and 10°, with biomechanical and observational studies showing that posterior slope greater than 12° increases the risk of graft failure by 5× by allowing for increased anterior tibial translation, putting increased stress on the graft. The primary indication for a slope correction osteotomy with a revision ACL reconstruction is a patient with tibial slope greater than 12° who has failed prior ACL reconstruction. Technique Description: In our preferred technique, we illustrate a slope reducing anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with concurrent revision ACL reconstruction rather than a staged ACL reconstruction. Results: The primary benefit of this technique is the ability to correct the tibial slope and reconstruct the ACL in one setting, which decreases recovery time, costs, and risks to the patients by eliminating an additional procedure. Discussion/Conclusion: In cases of ACL reconstruction failure, particularly in patients with multiple failures, an increased posterior tibial slope may be a contributing factor. Anterior closing wedge osteotomy has been shown to be an effective treatment, in patients with a native slope greater than 12°. A slope reducing anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with concurrent revision ACL reconstruction rather than a staged ACL reconstruction has a wide array of benefits.

Background: There is little in vivo data that describe the relationships between patellar tendon orientation, patellar tendon strain, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain during dynamic activities. Quantifying how the quadriceps load the ACL via the patellar tendon is important for understanding ACL injury mechanisms. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that flexion angle, patellar tendon orientation, and patellar tendon strain influence ACL strain during a single-leg jump. Specifically, we hypothesized that patellar tendon and ACL strains would increase concurrently when the knee is positioned near extension during the jump. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Models of the femur, tibia, ACL, patellar tendon, and quadriceps tendon attachment sites of 8 male participants were generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). High-speed biplanar radiographs during a single-leg jump were obtained. The bone models were registered to the radiographs, thereby reproducing the in vivo positions of the bones, ligament, and tendon attachment sites. Flexion angle, patellar tendon orientation, patellar tendon strain, and ACL strain were measured from the registered models. ACL and patellar tendon strains were approximated by normalizing their length at each knee position to their length at the time of MRI. Two separate bivariate linear regression models were used to assess relationships between flexion angle and patellar tendon orientation and between ACL strain and patellar tendon strain. A multivariate linear regression model was used to assess whether flexion angle and patellar tendon strain were significant predictors of ACL strain during the inflight and landing portions of the jump. Results: Both flexion angle and patellar tendon strain were significant predictors ( P < .05) of ACL strain. These results indicate that elevated ACL and patellar tendon strains were observed concurrently when the knee was positioned near extension. Conclusion: Concurrent increases in patellar tendon and ACL strains indicate that the quadriceps load the ACL via the patellar tendon when the knee is positioned near extension. Clinical Relevance: Increased ACL strain when the knee is positioned near extension before landing may be due to quadriceps contraction. Thus, landing with unanticipated timing on an extended knee may increase vulnerability to ACL injury as a taut ligament is more likely to fail.

Background: Pectoralis major (PM) tendon tears are a relatively uncommon injury that typically occurs in a young, active population during weightlifting or recreational sports. Musculotendinous junction and chronic PM tears often require tendon reconstruction due to inadequate remnant tendon stump or inability to reduce the remnant tendon stump to humeral footprint. Indications: We favor operative repair or reconstruction of PM tears in all young and active patients medically appropriate for surgery as supported by the literature. We present a technique for PM tendon reconstruction with semitendinosus allograft. This technique is applicable to musculotendinous junction and chronic tears. Technique: A modified deltopectoral approach is used. The PM tear is identified at the musculotendinous junction and the retracted muscle belly is mobilized. The PM tendon is reconstructed with a semitendinosus allograft using a Pulvertaft weave technique. The humeral footprint is prepped and the reconstructed tendon is properly tensioned and reduced. Fixation is performed with fibertapes loaded on 3 unicortical buttons. Postoperatively, the patient follows a graduated rehabilitation protocol. Results: There is a paucity of literature regarding outcomes of PM tendon reconstructions for musculotendinous junction tears. One study reported outcomes on 6 patients who had musculotendinous junction tears and underwent semitendinosus allograft reconstruction with a technique similar to ours. They report good clinical outcomes with high patient satisfaction regarding cosmetic outcome, return of strength, and overall satisfaction postoperatively. Discussion: It is our experience that the described technique for reconstruction of the PM tendon with semitendinosus allograft provides a viable option with good clinical outcomes for patients with PM ruptures at the musculotendinous junction.

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common injuries, however management remains challenging. Lesion size remains a common determinant of treatment and microfracture remains common for smaller lesions. Microfracture provides access to mesenchymal stem cells within the subchondral bone. Dehydrated micronized allogenic cartilage (DMAC) (BioCartilage, Arthrex, Naples, FL) utilizes a single stage attempt to augment microfracture with a scaffold over the defect to improve hyaline cartilage restoration. DMAC requires hydration with plasma rich protein (PRP) or bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). Currently, there is limited literature on pain scores and return-to-activities and satisfactory return- to-sport following DMAC treatments. The purpose of this study is to report pain scores, percent and time return-to -activities, percent and time to satisfactory return-to-sport following microfracture + DMAC and isolated microfracture. Methods: We reviewed a series of 65 cases (37 female and 28 male; mean age 34.6 (SD 14.1); mean BMI 27.3 (SD 6.2)) between 2010 and 2019 in which surgical treatment for OLT consisted of microfracture + DMAC, or isolated microfracture. Surgical procedure was determined by treating surgeon. Demographic, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0-10), return-to-activities, and satisfactory-return-to-sport were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 3-months, 6-months, and 1 year. Return-to- activities was defined as any engagement in desired activities, whereas satisfactory-return-to-sport was determined by patient- report. T-tests were used to determine between group differences. Results: Sixty-five cases (DMAC 25; isolated-microfracture: 40) demonstrated mean pain score at 3-months for DMAC and isolated-microfracture of 0.8 and 2.0, respectively, (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in remaining pain scores. By 1- year, 100% of DMAC and 87.5% of isolated-microfracture returned-to-activities, p=0.09. Of those that returned-to-activities there was no difference in time-to-return-to-activities between groups 82.9 days vs 82.4 days. By 1-year, patients that return-to-sport demonstrated a patient-reported satisfactory-level-of-return of 52.0% in DMAC and 37.5% in isolated-microfracture. Of those that returned satisfactorily-to-sport, the time-to-satisfactory-return-to-sport was similar (mean 139.5 and 135.7 days, p=0.66). A subgroup analysis of microfracture + DMAC group determined that PRP (n=16) had less pain at 3 months than BMAC (n=9), mean 0.8 vs 2.0, respectively; p=0.03, with no other differences noted (p>0.05). Conclusion: The use of microfracture + DMAC may improve early post-operative pain scores and improve ability to return to a patient-reported satisfactory level of sport by 1-year. Isolated microfracture and DMAC augmentation had similar rates and times to return-to-activities, and pain levels after 6-months post-operatively. The use of PRP to supplement DMAC improved early post- operative pain scores compared to BMAC which may be related to donor-site morbidity. Otherwise PRP and BMAC supplementation of DMAC had similar subsequent pain scores, and rate and time to return to activities. Augmentation of microfracture with DMAC for OLTs may improve outcomes compared to microfracture alone.

Background:Primary shoulder stabilization is successful, but there continues to be a risk of recurrence after operative repair, particularly in the young athlete. It is important for surgeons to understand the outcomes after various revision stabilization techniques to best counsel patients and manage expectations.Purpose:To analyze recurrent instability and revision surgery rates in patients who underwent revision anterior glenohumeral stabilization procedures with either arthroscopic repair, open repair, coracoid transfer, free bone block, or capsular reconstruction.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:We performed a systematic review of level 2 to 4 evidence studies using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Clinical studies of revision anterior glenohumeral stabilization (arthroscopic repair, open repair, coracoid transfer, free bone block, or capsular reconstruction) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were analyzed. The rate of recurrent instability, rate of revision surgery, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion were extracted and reported. Study methodological quality was evaluated using the Downs and Black quality assessment score.Results:A total of 37 studies met inclusion criteria and were available for analysis: 20 studies evaluated arthroscopic repair, 8 evaluated open repair, 5 evaluated Latarjet procedure, 3 evaluated bone block, and 2 evaluated capsular reconstruction. There was 1 study included in both arthroscopic and Latarjet procedures, for a total of 1110 revision cases. There was 1 level 2 study, and the remainder were level 3 or 4 with poor Downs and Black scores. Participants analyzed were most commonly young (weighted mean age, 26.1 years) and male (78.4%). The weighted mean clinical follow-up after revision surgery was 47.8 months. The weighted mean rate of recurrent instability was 3.8% (n = 245) after the Latarjet procedure, 13.4% (n = 260) after open repair, 16.0% (n = 531) after arthroscopic repair, 20.8% (n = 72) after bone block, and 31.0% (n = 35) after capsular reconstruction. The weighted mean rate of additional revision surgery was 0.0% after bone block, 0.02% after the Latarjet procedure, 9.0% after arthroscopic repair, 9.3% after open repair, and 22.8% after capsular reconstruction. Patient-reported outcomes and objective measures of range of motion and strength improved with all revision techniques.Conclusion:The current review identifies a deficiency in the literature pertaining to consistent meaningful outcomes and the effect of bone loss after revision shoulder stabilization. Published studies demonstrate, however, that revision shoulder stabilization using arthroscopic, open, coracoid transfer, or bone block techniques yielded satisfactory objective and patient-reported outcomes. The Latarjet procedure exhibited the lowest recurrent instability rate. This study confirms that recurrent instability remains a common problem, despite revision shoulder stabilization. The quality of research in revision shoulder stabilization remains poor, and higher quality studies are needed to establish best practices for treatment of this complex problem.

Background: Convergence insufficiency (CI) is a common binocular vision deficit after a sport-related concussion (SRC). CI may result in visual discomfort and vision-mediated functional difficulties such as slowed reading and compromised attention, leading to impaired academic, work, and sport performance. Purpose: To test the reliability of repeated near point of convergence (NPC) measurements in a sample of athletes after an SRC; compare the symptoms and cognitive impairment of athletes with normal NPC to those with CI after an SRC; and explore the relationship among age, sex, learning disability, migraine history, and CI. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 78 athletes (mean age, 14.31 ± 2.77 years) who were seen a mean 5.79 ± 5.63 days after an SRC were administered 3 trials of an NPC assessment, along with neurocognitive (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing [ImPACT]) and symptom assessments. Patients were divided into normal NPC (NPC ≤5 cm; n = 45) and CI (NPC >5 cm; n = 33) groups. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) assessed the consistency of NPC across the 3 trials. The ANOVAs were employed to examine differences on neurocognitive composites and symptoms between the normal NPC and CI groups. Stepwise regressions (controlling for age and symptom scores on the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale [PCSS]) were conducted to evaluate the predictive utility of the NPC distance for neurocognitive impairment. Results: Groups did not differ on demographic or injury characteristics. NPC differed between trial 1 and trials 2 ( P = .02) and 3 ( P = .01) for the CI group but not the normal NPC group. Internal consistency was high across NPC measurements (ICC range, 0.95-0.98). Patients with CI performed worse on verbal memory ( P = .02), visual motor speed ( P = .02), and reaction time ( P = .001, η2 = .13) and had greater total symptom scores ( P = .02) after the injury. Results of hierarchical regression revealed that the NPC distance contributed significantly to the model for reaction time ( P < .001). Conclusion: CI was common (~42%) in athletes evaluated within 1 month after an SRC. Athletes with CI had worse neurocognitive impairment and higher symptom scores than did those with normal NPC. Clinicians should consider routinely screening for NPC as part of a comprehensive concussion evaluation to help inform treatment recommendations, academic accommodations, and referrals for vision therapy.

Background: There has been increasing attention and understanding of sport-related concussions. Recent studies show that neurocognitive testing and symptom clusters may predict protracted recovery in concussed athletes. On-field signs and symptoms have not been examined empirically as possible predictors of protracted recovery. Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine which on-field signs and symptoms were predictive of a protracted (≥21 days) versus rapid (≤7 days) recovery after a sports-related concussion. On-field signs and symptoms included confusion, loss of consciousness, posttraumatic amnesia, retrograde amnesia, imbalance, dizziness, visual problems, personality changes, fatigue, sensitivity to light/noise, numbness, and vomiting. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The sample included 107 male high school football athletes who completed computerized neurocognitive testing within an average 2.4 days after injury, and who were followed until returned to play as determined by neuropsychologists using international clinical concussion management guidelines. Athletes were then grouped into rapid (≤7 days, n = 62) or protracted (≥21 days, n = 36) recovery time groups. The presence of on-field signs and symptoms was determined at the time of injury by trained sports medicine professionals (ie, ATC [certified athletic trainer], team physician). A series of odds ratios with χ2 analyses and subsequent logistic regression were used to determine which on-field signs and symptoms were associated with an increased risk for a protracted recovery. Results: Dizziness at the time of injury was associated with a 6.34 odds ratio (95% confidence interval = 1.34-29.91, χ2 = 5.44, P = .02) of a protracted recovery from concussion. Surprisingly, the remaining on-field signs and symptoms were not associated with an increased risk of protracted recovery in the current study. Conclusion: Assessment of on-field dizziness may help identify high school athletes at risk for a protracted recovery. Such information will improve prognostic information and allow clinicians to manage and treat concussion more effectively in these at-risk athletes.

Background: Concussions affect an estimated 136 000 high school athletes yearly. Computerized neurocognitive testing has been shown to be appropriately sensitive and specific in diagnosing concussions, but no studies have assessed its utility to predict length of recovery. Determining prognosis during subacute recovery after sports concussion will help clinicians more confidently address return-to-play and academic decisions. Purpose: To quantify the prognostic ability of computerized neurocognitive testing in combination with symptoms during the subacute recovery phase from sports-related concussion. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: In sum, 108 male high school football athletes completed a computer-based neurocognitive test battery within 2.23 days of injury and were followed until returned to play as set by international guidelines. Athletes were grouped into protracted recovery (>14 days; n = 50) or short-recovery (≤14 days; n = 58). Separate discriminant function analyses were performed using total symptom score on Post-Concussion Symptom Scale, symptom clusters (migraine, cognitive, sleep, neuropsychiatric), and Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing neurocognitive scores (verbal memory, visual memory, reaction time, processing speed). Results: Multiple discriminant function analyses revealed that the combination of 4 symptom clusters and 4 neurocognitive composite scores had the highest sensitivity (65.22%), specificity (80.36%), positive predictive value (73.17%), and negative predictive value (73.80%) in predicting protracted recovery. Discriminant function analyses of total symptoms on the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale alone had a sensitivity of 40.81%; specificity, 79.31%; positive predictive value, 62.50%; and negative predictive value, 61.33%. The 4 symptom clusters alone discriminant function analyses had a sensitivity of 46.94%; specificity, 77.20%; positive predictive value, 63.90%; and negative predictive value, 62.86%. Discriminant function analyses of the 4 computerized neurocognitive scores alone had a sensitivity of 53.20%; specificity, 75.44%; positive predictive value, 64.10%; and negative predictive value, 66.15%. Conclusion: The use of computerized neurocognitive testing in conjunction with symptom clusters results improves sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of predicting protracted recovery compared with each used alone. There is also a net increase in sensitivity of 24.41% when using neurocognitive testing and symptom clusters together compared with using total symptoms on Post-Concussion Symptom Scale alone.