1. Advantages and disadvantages of graduated and inverse graduated compression hosiery in patients with chronic venous insufficiency and healthy volunteers: A prospective, mono-centric, blinded, open randomised, controlled and cross-over trial
- Author
-
Michael Jünger, Helene Riebe, Hermann Haase, and Wolfgang Konschake
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Elastic compression ,Therapeutic effectiveness ,Chronic venous insufficiency ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Severity of Illness Index ,Varicose Veins ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Quality of life ,Risk Factors ,Germany ,Healthy volunteers ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cross-Over Studies ,business.industry ,Equipment Design ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Compression therapy ,medicine.disease ,Compression (physics) ,Crossover study ,Healthy Volunteers ,Surgery ,Plethysmography ,Treatment Outcome ,Venous Insufficiency ,Tolerability ,Patient Satisfaction ,Chronic Disease ,Quality of Life ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Stockings, Compression - Abstract
Background The therapeutic effectiveness of compression therapy depends on the selection of compression hosiery. Objectives To assess efficacy and tolerability of graduated elastic compression stockings (GECS) and inverse graduated elastic compression stockings (PECS). Methods Thirty-two healthy volunteers and thirty-two patients with chronic venous insufficiency were analysed; wear period: one week for each stocking type (randomised, blinded). Primary outcome: volume reduction of ‘Lower leg’ (Image3D®) and ‘Distal leg and foot’ (water plethysmography). Secondary outcomes: clinical symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency assessed by the Venous Clinical Severity Score, side effects and wear comfort in both groups. Results Volume of ‘Lower leg’: significant reduction in healthy volunteers (mean GECS: −37.5 mL, mean PECS: −37.2 mL) and in patients (mean GECS: −55.6 mL, mean PECS: −41.6 mL). Volume of ‘Distal lower leg and foot’: significant reduction in healthy volunteers (mean GECS: −27 mL, mean PECS: −16.7 mL), significant reduction in patients by GECS (mean: −43.4 mL), but non-significant reduction by PECS (mean: −22.6 mL). Clinical symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency were improved significantly better with GECS than with PECS, p Conclusion GECS and PECS reduce volume of the segment ‘Lower leg’ in patients and healthy volunteers. Patients’ volume of the ‘Distal lower leg and foot’, however, were diminished significantly only by GECS ( p = 0.0001). Patients’ complaints were improved by both GECS and PECS, and GECS were superior to PECS.
- Published
- 2016