Search

Background:The acetabular labrum contains free nerve endings, and an unstable labrum can result in increased femoral head movement during hip motion. This can be caused by chondrolabral junction (CLJ) separation, especially in association with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement, and may contribute to hip pain.Hypothesis:Rim resection alone has no effect on suction seal biomechanics. Further, separation of the CLJ changes hip suction seal biomechanics when compared with those of the native state, whereas repair and refixation with suture anchors restore these biomechanical parameters.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:A total of 12 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hips were used in this study. Hips were mounted in a saline bath on a dynamic tensile testing machine and were distracted at a rate of 0.5 mm/s from neutral position. A total of 3 parameters (force, displacement, and intra-articular pressure) were measured throughout testing. Before testing, hips were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: 1 that included the CLJ separation (CLJ Cut group) and 1 that did not (CLJ Intact group). Hips were tested in the following states: (1) native, (2) rim trimming, (3) separated CLJ (CLJ Cut group only), and (4) labral repair/refixation. For each group a linear mixed-effects model was used to compare biomechanical parameters between states.Results:Rim trimming did not affect any suction seal parameters relative to those of the native state. In the CLJ Cut group, no significant difference in distance to break the suction seal was observed for any states compared with that of the native state. In the CLJ Intact group, the distance to break the suction seal was significantly shorter in the labral refixation state (1.8 mm) than the native state (5.6 mm; P = .002). The maximum distraction force (62.1 ± 54.1 N) and the peak negative pressure (−36.6 ± 24.2 kPa) of the labral repair/refixation state were significantly lower than those of the native state in both groups (93.4 ± 41.7 N, P = .01; –60.7 ± 20.4 kPa, P = .02).Conclusion:Rim trimming did not change the biomechanical properties of the labral suction seal. Labral refixation resulted in a shorter distance to break the labral suction seal. This indicates that labral mobility is reduced by the labral refixation procedure, which could be beneficial in postoperative pain relief and labral healing.Clinical Relevance:The labral refixation reduced labral mobility, which could be beneficial for both pain relief and labral healing to the acetabulum after pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement resection.

Background: While several studies have qualitatively described the anatomy of the glenohumeral ligaments, there remains a lack of consensus regarding their quantitative humeral and glenoid attachment sites. Purpose: To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the anatomic humeral and glenoid attachment sites of the glenohumeral ligaments and their relationship to well-established anatomic landmarks. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 10 nonpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were included in this study. A 3-dimensional coordinate measuring device was used to quantify the location of pertinent bony landmarks and soft tissue attachment areas. All subcutaneous tissues and musculature were removed, with the exception of the rotator cuff (respective muscle bellies cut at their musculotendinous junctions) and the long head of the biceps tendon. The superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL), middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL), anteroinferior glenohumeral ligament (AIGHL), posteroinferior glenohumeral ligament (PIGHL), and coracohumeral ligament (CHL) were then transected. Coordinates of points along the perimeters of attachment sites were used to calculate areas, while coordinates of center points were used to determine distances between surgically relevant attachment sites and pertinent bony landmarks. Results: The mean length of the SGHL humeral attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 9.5 ± 3.2 mm, spanning from 12:55 to 1:40, while the SGHL glenoid attachment to the labrum was 1.9 ± 1.2 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim, spanning from 12:30 to 12:45. The mean length of the MGHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 16.4 ± 3.0 mm, equating to 2:10 to 3:35 on the humeral head clockface, and the glenoid attachment was confluent with the labrum, attaching 1.5 ± 1.0 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim and thus extending from 1:50 to 2:35 on the glenoid clockface. The mean length of the AIGHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 12.0 ± 3.0 mm, spanning from 4:05 to 5:10 on the humeral head clockface. The AIGHL bony footprint on the glenoid neck was 48.4 ± 24.5 mm2. The confluent attachment of the AIGHL to the labrum was 1.2 ± 0.9 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim, corresponding to 3:30 to 4:05 on the glenoid clockface. The mean length of the PIGHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 12.0 ± 1.4 mm, spanning from 7:40 to 8:50 on the humeral head clockface. The PIGHL attachment to the labrum was 1.2 ± 0.5 mm medial to the most lateral extent of the labral rim. This attachment to the labrum was calculated to span from 7:35 to 8:50 on the glenoid clockface. The mean length of the CHL origin from the coracoid was 12.9 mm, with its most anterior point located a mean of 14.1 mm from the tip of the coracoid. The mean length of the CHL attachment along the intra-articular cartilage margin was 10.0 ± 4.0 mm, spanning from 11:55 to 12:40 on the humeral head clockface. Conclusion: Glenohumeral ligaments were consistently identified in all specimens with minor anatomic variability for the SGHL, MGHL, AIGHL, and PIGHL. Important landmarks including the cartilage surface of the humerus, the bicipital groove, and the clockface can be utilized intraoperatively when attempting anatomic repair of these structures. Clinical Relevance: There are multiple open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures that rely on anatomic restoration of these static stabilizers to provide optimal shoulder function and prevent recurrent instability. The qualitative descriptions are comparable with current literature; however, this study is the first to quantify the glenohumeral capsular and ligamentous attachments. The data provided allow for reliable landmarks to be established from known bony and soft tissue structures.

Background: Increased posterior tibial slope and posterior medial meniscus root tears increase the force experienced by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and predispose patients to higher rates of primary ACL injury or ACL graft failure after an ACL reconstruction (ACLR). However, the interplay among sagittal plane tibial slope, medial meniscus root tears, and ACLR graft force remains inadequately defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to quantify the effect of sagittal plane tibial slope on ACLR graft force at varying knee flexion angles with an intact medial meniscus, a posterior medial meniscus root tear, and a medial meniscus root repair. Our null hypothesis was that changes in slope and meniscal state would have no effect on the forces experienced by the ACLR graft. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten male fresh-frozen cadaveric human knees underwent a posteriorly based high tibial osteotomy. A spanning external fixator and wedges of varying sizes were used to stabilize the osteotomy and allow for accurate slope adjustment. After ACLR, specimens were compressed with a 1000-N axial load at flexion angles of 0° and 30° for each of the 3 meniscal states and at tibial slopes of 0° to 15° at 3° increments. Graft loads were recorded through a force transducer clamped to the graft. Results: Increasing tibial slope led to a linear increase in ACLR graft force at 0° and 30° of knee flexion. Posterior medial meniscus root tear led to significant increases in ACLR graft forces over the intact state, while root repair restored the function of the medial meniscus as a secondary stabilizer. At 30° of knee flexion, the tibial slope effect on ACLR graft force was potentiated in the root tear state as compared with the intact and root repair states—test of interaction effect: t(139) = 2.67 ( P = .009). Conclusion: Increases in tibial slope lead to a linear increase in ACLR graft forces, and this effect is magnified in the setting of a posterior medial meniscus root tear. At slopes >12°, a slope-changing osteotomy could be considered in the setting of a revision ACLR with a concomitant medial meniscus root tear. Clinical Relevance: Defining the relationship between tibial slope and varying states of meniscal insufficiency can help determine when it may be necessary to perform a slope-decreasing proximal tibial osteotomy before ACLR and meniscal repair.

Background: Limited biomechanical data exist for dual small plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures, and no prior study has concurrently compared dual small plating to larger superior or anteroinferior single plate and screw constructs. Purpose: To biomechanically compare dual small orthogonal plating, superior plating, and anteroinferior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures by use of a cadaveric model. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: The study used 18 cadaveric clavicle specimens (9 pairs total), and 3 plating techniques were studied: anteroinferior, superior, and dual. The dual plating technique used smaller diameter plates and screws (1.6-mm thickness) than the other, single plate techniques (3.3-mm thickness). Each of the 9 clavicle pairs was randomly assigned a combination of 2 plating techniques, and randomization was used to determine which techniques were used for the right and left specimens. Clavicles were plated and then osteotomized to create an inferior butterfly fracture model, which was then fixed with a single interfragmentary screw. Clavicle specimens were then potted for mechanical testing. Initial bending, axial, and torsional stiffness of each construct was determined through use of a randomized nondestructive cyclic testing protocol followed by load to failure. Results: No significant differences were found in cyclical axial ( P = .667) or torsional ( P = .526) stiffness between plating groups. Anteroinferior plating demonstrated significantly higher cyclical bending stiffness than superior plating ( P = .005). No significant difference was found in bending stiffness between dual plating and either anteroinferior ( P = .129) or superior plating ( P = .067). No significant difference was noted in load to failure among plating methods ( P = .353). Conclusion: Dual plating with a smaller plate-screw construct is biomechanically similar to superior and anteroinferior single plate fixation that uses larger plate-screw constructs. No significant differences were found between dual plating and either superior or anteroinferior single plating in axial, bending, or torsional stiffness or in bending load to failure. Dual small plating is a viable option for fixing midshaft clavicle fractures and may be a useful low-profile technique that avoids a larger and more prominent plate-screw construct. Clinical Relevance: Plate prominence and hardware irritation are commonly reported complaints and reasons for revision surgery after plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures. Dual small plate fixation has been used to improve cosmetic acceptability, minimize hardware irritation, and decrease reoperation rate. Biomechanically, dual small plate fixation performed similarly to larger single plate fixation in this cadaveric model of butterfly fracture.

Background: Although posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) repairs are often successful, postoperative meniscal extrusion after a root repair has been identified as a potential clinical problem. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to quantitatively evaluate the tibiofemoral contact mechanics and extent of meniscal extrusion after a PMMR repair. It was hypothesized that the addition of a centralization suture (into the posterior medial tibial plateau) would help restore normal joint load-bearing characteristics and restore the native amount of meniscal extrusion after a root tear. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the amount of meniscal extrusion would be greatest in loaded and flexed knees when measured at the posterior border of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact mechanics were measured using 3-dimensional digitization and pressure sensors in 10 nonpaired, human cadaveric knees. The PMMR of each knee was tested under 6 states: (1) intact; (2) type 2A PMMR tear; (3) anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair; (4) anatomic transtibial pull-out repair with centralization; (5) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair; and (6) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair with centralization, with randomization of the order of conditions 3 and 4, and 5 and 6. The testing protocol loaded knees with a 1000-N axial compressive force at 4 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) in each state. Meniscal extrusion was measured with a 3-dimensional coordinate digitizer at 0° and 90° in both the loaded and unloaded states and calculated from the difference from the articular margin of the tibia to the periphery of the meniscus. Peak contact pressure, contact area, and total contact pressure were also recorded for all states at all flexion angles. Statistical analysis investigated the independent effects of flexion, state, and loading using 3 distinct 2-factor models. Results: Differences in the contact mechanics between repair techniques were most notable at higher flexion angles, demonstrating significantly higher average and peak contact pressures for nonanatomic repair states when compared with anatomic repairs with and without centralization (all P < .05). In unloaded knees at full extension, the magnitude of medial meniscal extrusion was significantly higher at the posterior border of the MCL compared with the posterior medial tibia ( P < .001) and adjacent to the root attachment on the tibia locations ( P < .001). Both anatomic repair states had no significant difference in the degree of extrusion when compared with the intact state. Conclusion: The anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair and the anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair with centralization techniques best restored contact mechanics of the knee and meniscal extrusion when compared with root tear and nonanatomic repair states at time zero. There were no significant differences in contact pressure or magnitude of extrusion between the anatomic repair state and the anatomic repair with centralization state. We found that extrusion is best measured in the coronal plane at the posterior border of the MCL for unloaded knees. However, the degree of extrusion increased as the knee was loaded and flexed to 90°. Clinical Relevance: When there are concerns about meniscal extrusion with a medial meniscal root repair, the addition of a centralization suture may be beneficial for patients in reducing pathologic meniscal extrusion and restoring joint contact mechanics.

Background: Radial head subluxation, known as pulled elbow or Nursemaid’s elbow, is a common pediatric condition that occurs when a longitudinal traction force is applied to an elbow that is pronated and extended. Although the stability of the proximal radioulnar joint has been previously examined in cadaveric models, there are no current studies quantifying the biomechanics of nursemaid’s elbow. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate and quantify the axial traction force required to produce a nursemaid’s elbow in a pediatric cadaver specimen. Methods: Two fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows from a single 3 year-old male donor were dissected by a fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon. An Instron 5944 testing machine with a 2 kN load cell was used to perform uniaxial testing. The radius and humerus were mounted to the Instron machine, and loaded in the axial direction with the elbow in full extension. Loading occurred at a rate of 10 mm/sec for 4 seconds, during which the force and actuator displacement were continuously recorded. The local instantaneous load and extension displacement at the time of subluxation were recorded, and data was synced with high-frame-rate video footage used to confirm the annular ligament subluxation. Results: The load to failure required to produce the nursemaid’s elbow injury in the first elbow was 31N, with a failure displacement of 4.6mm. The second elbow demonstrated a load to failure of 26N, with a failure displacement of 4.6mm. After subluxation, we reduced the annular ligament from the first specimen. The elbow was then re-tested and demonstrated a load to failure of 20N, with a failure displacement of 2.6mm. Conclusion: Axial traction applied to a pediatric cadaver specimen results in subluxation of the annular ligament into the radiocapitellar joint. The mean load to failure is 28.5N, and a lower load to failure was required to produce a recurrent subluxation in a previously injured specimen. Lower load for a recurrent subluxation may be attributed to damage on the annular ligament due to the first subluxation. [Figure: see text]

Category: Sports; Basic Sciences/Biologics Introduction/Purpose: Syndesmosis injuries are common and frequently occur with deltoid injuries but optimal repair remains controversial. Prior biomechanical studies have demonstrated that 1 and 2 suture buttons are equivalent to screw fixation and that parallel or divergent suture buttons are equivalent to single suture button. Prior studies, however, created constructs with suture buttons within 1cm from each other (2-3cm from joint surface). Additionally, the role of deltoid injury and repair have not been evaluated in conjunction with syndesmosis injury and repair. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a narrow vs spread 2-suture button construct with and without a deltoid repair. Methods: Four matched lower leg specimens (8 total specimens) aged mean 60.2 years (range 57-66 years; 6 females and 2 males; mean BMI 21.1) were tested. Ankle motion under cyclic loading was measured in multiple planes: first in the intact state, following simulated syndesmosis and deltoid injury, then following fixation with 1 of 2 randomly assigned constructs: 2 parallel suture buttons at 2 and 3cm from joint line (narrow); and 2 parallel suture buttons at 1 and 4cm from joint line (spread), and then finally following a deltoid repair with each construct. Each state was tested at a constant 750 N axial compressive force and 5N internal/external torque. Rotation position (degrees) and anterior-posterior displacement (mm) were collected throughout the testing to characterize relative spatial relationships of the tibiofibular articulation using 3D video capture technology. Results: Narrow and spread 2-suture button constructs improved rotation and translation compared to cut state (p0.05). There were no significant differences in rotation or translation between Narrow and Spread constructs (p>0.05). The addition of a deltoid repair did not improve rotation or translation compared to syndesmosis repair with either construct alone (p>0.05). Conclusion: The preliminary results of this study suggest that constructs with suture button placed close together or spread apart during fixation of combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury could improve rotation and translation equally. Additionally, in a combined syndesmosis and deltoid injury, the addition of a deltoid repair to a syndesmosis repair did not strengthen the construct. These findings suggest that repair of syndesmosis alone may be sufficient in combined syndesmosis and deltoid injuries. Additional matched samples will be tested to validate preliminary findings.

Background:Historically, radial meniscal tears were treated with partial or near-total meniscectomy, which usually resulted in poor outcomes. Radial meniscal tears function similar to a total meniscectomy and are challenging to treat. Repair of radial meniscal tears should be performed to prevent joint deterioration and the need for salvage procedures in the future.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose was to compare 3 repair techniques for radial tears of the medial meniscus: the 2-tunnel, hybrid, and hybrid tunnel techniques. It was hypothesized that there would be no differences among the 3 groups in regard to gapping and ultimate failure strength.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Thirty human male cadaver knees (10 matched pairs, n = 20; 10 unpaired, n = 10) were used to compare the 2-tunnel, hybrid, and hybrid tunnel repairs. A complete radial tear was made at the midbody of the medial meniscus. Repairs were performed according to the described techniques. Specimens were potted and mounted on a universal material testing machine where each specimen was cyclically loaded for 1000 cycles before experiencing a pull to failure. Gap distances at the tear site, ultimate failure load, and failure location were measured and recorded.Results:After 1000 cycles of cyclic loading, there were no significant differences in displacement among the 2-tunnel repair (3.0 ± 1.7 mm), hybrid repair (3.0 ± 0.9 mm), and hybrid tunnel repair (2.3 ± 1.0 mm; P = .4042). On pull-to-failure testing, there were also no significant differences in ultimate failure strength among the 2-tunnel repair (259 ± 103 N), hybrid repair (349 ± 149 N), and hybrid tunnel repair (365 ± 146 N; P = .26). However, the addition of vertical mattress sutures to act as a “rip stop” significantly reduced the likelihood of the sutures pulling through the meniscus during pull-to-failure testing for the hybrid and hybrid tunnel repairs (4 of 16, 25%) as compared with the 2-tunnel repair (7 of 9, 78%; P = .017).Conclusion:The results showed equivalent biomechanical testing with regard to gap distance and pull-to-failure strength among the 3 repairs. The addition of the vertical mattress sutures to act as a rip stop was effective in preventing meniscal cutout through the meniscus.Clinical Relevance:Effective healing of radial meniscal tears after repair is paramount to prevent joint deterioration and symptom development. Each tested repair showed a biomechanically equivalent and stable construct to use to repair radial meniscal tears. The authors recommend that rip stop vertical mattress sutures be used, especially in poor-quality meniscal tissue, to prevent suture cutout.

Background: Transtibial pull-out repair of the medial meniscal posterior root (MMPR) has been largely assessed through biomechanical studies. Biomechanically comparing different suture types would further optimize MMPR fixation and affect clinical care. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal suture material for MMPR fixation. It was hypothesized that ultra high–molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape would be biomechanically superior to UHMWPE suture and standard suture. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The MMPR attachment was divided in 24 human cadaveric knees and randomly assigned to 3 repair groups: UHMWPE suture tape, UHMWPE suture, and standard suture. Specimens were dissected down to the medial meniscus, and the posterior root attachments were sectioned off the tibia. Two-tunnel transtibial pull-out repair with 2 sutures, as determined by the testing group, was performed. The repair constructs were cyclically loaded between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz for 1000 cycles to mimic the forces experienced on the medial meniscus during postoperative rehabilitation. Displacement was recorded at 1, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Ultimate failure load, displacement at failure, and load at 3 mm of displacement (clinical failure) were also recorded. Results: UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement of the medial meniscus when compared with standard suture at 1 (–0.22 mm [95% CI, –0.41 to –0.02]; P = .025) and 50 (–0.35 mm [95% CI, –0.67 to –0.03]; P = .029) cycles. There were no other significant differences observed in displacement between groups at any number of cycles. UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement at the time of failure than standard suture (–3.71 mm [95% CI, –7.17 to –0.24]; P = .034). UHMWPE suture tape had a significantly higher load to reach the clinical failure displacement of 3 mm than UHMWPE suture (15.64 N [95% CI, 0.02 to 31.26]; P = .05). There were no significant differences in ultimate failure load between groups. Conclusion: The meniscal root repair construct with UHMWPE suture tape may be stronger and less prone to displacement than that with standard suture or UHMWPE suture. Clinical Relevance: UHMWPE suture tape may provide better clinical results compared with UHMWPE suture and standard suture.

Background:The lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow is important in preventing posterolateral rotary instability of the elbow. Understanding the quantitative anatomy of this ligamentous complex and the overlying extensor musculature can aid in the surgical treatment of problems affecting the lateral side of the elbow.Purpose:To perform qualitative and quantitative anatomic evaluations of the lateral elbow ligamentous complex and common extensor muscle origins with specific attention to pertinent osseous landmarks.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A total of 10 nonpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows (mean age, 42.2 years; all male) were utilized. Quantitative analysis was performed using a 3-dimensional coordinate measuring device to quantify the location of pertinent bony landmarks, tendons, and ligament footprints of the lateral side of the elbow.Results:The extensor carpi radialis brevis was the only humeral footprint found to cross the radiocapitellar joint line, extending a mean 5.9 mm (95% CI, 4.7-7.0) distal to the joint line. With the elbow in full extension, the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) humeral footprint was found 7.1 mm (95% CI, 4.7-9.4) anterior and 9.8 mm (95% CI, 8.4-11.2) distal to the lateral epicondyle and 8.6 mm (95% CI, 7.5-9.7) proximal to the radiocapitellar joint line, while the radial collateral ligament humeral footprint was found 6.6 mm (95% CI, 5.5-7.8) anterior and 5.6 mm (95% CI, 4.0-7.2) distal to the lateral epicondyle and 12.7 mm (95% CI, 11.4-14.0) proximal to the radiocapitellar joint line. The center of the ulnar attachment of the LUCL was found 1.4 mm (95% CI, 0.7-2.1) anterior and 2.4 mm (95% CI, 1.2-6.0) proximal to the supinator tubercle and 24.4 mm (95% CI, 22.7-26.1) distal to the radiocapitellar joint line. The center of the ulnar attachment of the annular ligament was found to be 17.3 mm proximal to the supinator tubercle.Conclusion:The current study provides measured distances of LUCL and radial collateral ligament attachments in reference to clinically relevant landmarks, which can potentially aid surgeons in performing more anatomic reconstruction or repair of the lateral ligamentous complex of the elbow.

Objectives: The roles of the medial patellofemoral and patellotibial ligaments in patellofemoral kinematics have been previously reported. However, the effect of isolated and combined surgical reconstruction of these ligaments to restore native patellofemoral kinematics is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the isolated and combined effects of medial patellofemoral and patellotibial ligament deficiency and reconstruction on patellofemoral kinematics. Methods: Sixteen matched-paired female, fresh-frozen, cadaveric knee specimens with a mean age of 53.5 years (range, 26-65) were used. Specimens were tested in five conditions; 1) intact, 2) MPFL or MPTL cut, 3) MPFL and MPTL combined cut, 4) MPFL or MPTL reconstruction, and 5) MPFL and MPTL combined reconstruction. Dynamic testing was performed by taking the knees through range of motion from 0° to 90° of knee flexion at 60 mm/min using a dynamic tensile testing machine by applying a force through the quadricep tendon. Following dynamic testing, knees were tested statically using a lateral load of 45 N applied to the patella at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. In both dynamic and static loading tests, a motion capture system detected patellar position for each testing state to distinguish changes in patellar kinematics. Linear mixed effects modeling was performed to compare testing states. Results: Isolated MPFL deficiency created the greatest lateral translation of the patella at all knee flexion angles (pConclusions: The MPFL plays the greatest role in medial patellar stability, but the MPTL appears to have a large influence on patella tracking. The MPTL may be most important in preventing patellofemoral osteoarthritis following patella dislocation. Further investigation is needed to evaluate patellofemoral contact pressure following medial patellar ligament reconstruction.

Background: Meniscal ramp lesions have been defined as a tear of the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) at the meniscocapsular junction or an injury to the meniscotibial attachment. Precise anatomic descriptions of these structures are limited in the current literature. Purpose: To quantitatively and qualitatively describe the PHMM and posteromedial capsule anatomy pertaining to the location of a meniscal ramp lesion with reference to surgically relevant landmarks. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen male nonpaired fresh-frozen cadavers were used. The locations of the posteromedial meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments were identified. Measurements to surgically relevant landmarks were performed with a coordinate measuring system. To further analyze the posteromedial meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments, hematoxylin and eosin and alcian blue staining were conducted on a separate sample of 10 nonpaired specimens. Results: The posterior meniscocapsular attachment had a mean ± SD length of 20.2 ± 6.0 mm and attached posteroinferiorly to the PHMM at a mean depth of 36.4% of the total posterior meniscal height. The posterior meniscotibial ligament attached on the PHMM 16.5 mm posterior and 7.7 mm medial to the center of the posterior medial meniscal root attachment. The meniscotibial ligament tibial attachment was 5.9 ± 1.3 mm inferior to the articular cartilage margin of the posterior medial tibial plateau. The posterior meniscocapsular attachment converged with the meniscotibial ligament at the most posterior point of the meniscocapsular junction in all specimens. Histological staining of the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial ligament PHMM attachments showed similar structure, cell density, and fiber directionality, with no qualitative difference in the makeup of their collagen matrices across all specimens. Conclusion: The anatomy of the area where a medial meniscal ramp tear occurs revealed that the 2 posterior meniscal attachments merged at a common attachment on the PHMM. Histological analysis validated a shared attachment point of the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments of the PHMM. Clinical Relevance: The findings of this study provide the anatomic foundation for an improved understanding of the meniscocapsular and meniscotibial attachments of the PHMM, which may help provide a more precise definition of a meniscal ramp lesion.

Objectives: Historically, radial meniscal tears were treated with partial or near- total meniscectomy which usually resulted in with poor outcomes. Radial meniscal tears function similar to a total meniscectomy and are challenging to treat. Repair of radial meniscal tears should be performed to prevent joint deterioration and the need for salvage procedures in the future. The purpose of this study was to compare three novel repair techniques for radial tears of the medial meniscus; the two-tunnel, the hybrid, and the hybrid tunnel techniques. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between the three groups in regards to gapping and ultimate failure strength. Methods: Thirty human male cadaver knees (ten matched pairs (n=20) and ten unpaired (n=10)) were used to compare the two-tunnel, hybrid, and hybrid tunnel repairs. A complete radial tear was made at the midbody of the medial meniscus. Repairs were performed according to the described techniques. Specimens were potted and mounted on a universal Instron testing machine where each specimen was cyclically loaded for 1000 cycles before experiencing a pull-to-failure. Gap distances at the tear site, ultimate failure load, and failure location were measured and recorded. Results: After 1000 cycles of cyclic loading, there was no significant difference in displacement between the two-tunnel repair (3.0 mm ± 1.7 mm), hybrid repair (3.0 mm ± 0.9 mm) or hybrid tunnel repair (2.3 mm ± 1.0 mm) (p=0.4042). On pull-to-failure testing there was also no significant difference in ultimate failure strength when comparing the two-tunnel (259 N ± 103 N), hybrid (349 N ± 149 N), or hybrid tunnel (365 N ± 146 N) repairs (p=0.26). However, the addition of vertical mattress sutures to act as a “rip stop” did significantly reduce the likelihood of the sutures pulling through the meniscus during pull-to-failure testing for the hybrid and hybrid tunnel repairs (4/16=25%) when compared to the two-tunnel repair (7/9=78%) (p=0.017). Conclusion: This study biomechanically evaluated two previously described techniques- the two-tunnel and hybrid repair- as well as one novel repair technique- the hybrid tunnel repair. The results showed equivalent biomechanical testing in regard to gap distance and pull to failure strength among each repair. The addition of the vertical mattress sutures to act as a rip stop suture was effective in preventing meniscal cut out through the meniscus. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Objectives: To quantitatively evaluate the biomechanical effects of a novel peripheral stabilization technique for the treatment of posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) avulsions and to identify an optimal diagnostic position to assess for the presence of meniscal extrusion. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact mechanics were measured using 3D digitization and pressure sensors, respectively, in ten nonpaired, human cadaver knees. The PMMR of each knee was tested under 6 states: (1) intact; (2) complete root detachment; (3) anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair; (4) anatomic transtibial pull-out repair with peripheral stabilization; (5) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair; and (6) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair with peripheral stabilization, with randomization of the order of conditions 3 & 4, and 5 & 6. The testing protocol loaded knees with a 1000 N axial compressive force at four flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) in each state. Meniscal extrusion was recorded at 0° and 90° in both loaded and unloaded states at three locations along the peripheral rim of the medial tibial plateau. Degree of meniscal extrusion was defined as the radial displacement of the medial meniscus from three corresponding points on the posteromedial edge of the tibial plateau: (1) posterior border of MCL; (2) posteromedial capsule midway between the MCL and posterior root; and (3) the direct posterior capsule. Peak contact pressure, contact area, and total contact pressure were also recorded for all states at all flexion angles. Results: Statistical analysis investigated the independent effects of flexion, state, and loading using three, distinct two-factor models. In unloaded knees in full extension, the highest degree of meniscal extrusion was observed at the posterior border of the MCL across all repair testing states (p < 0.001). At full extension, loaded knees exhibited significantly higher extrusion in comparison to unloaded across all knee states at the MCL position (mean 1.1 mm, 95% CI [0.8, 1.4], p Conclusion: Anatomic and anatomic with peripheral suture repair techniques best restore contact mechanics of the knee. In current clinical scenarios where knees are unloaded and imaged in full extension, extrusion is best measured in the coronal plane at the posterior border of the MCL. However, this is likely a “best-case” scenario, as this study has shown that the degree of extrusion increases as the knee is loaded and flexed to 90°. When only a non-anatomic repair can be performed the addition of this peripheral stabilization technique may be beneficial for patients in reducing pathologic extrusion of the meniscus. [Table: see text]

Background: Metal screws are traditionally used to fix the coracoid process to the glenoid. Despite stable fixation, metal screws have been associated with hardware complications. Therefore, some studies have advocated for suture button fixation during the Latarjet procedure to reduce the complications associated with screw fixation. Purpose: To biomechanically evaluate the ultimate failure load of a cortical button and self-tensioning suture versus metal screws for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight matched pairs of fresh-frozen, male cadaveric shoulders (N = 16) underwent the Latarjet procedure. The shoulders of each pair were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: fixation using two 3.75-mm cannulated, fully threaded metal screws or fixation using a double suture button construct. Specimens were secured in a dynamic testing machine and cyclically preconditioned from 2 to 10 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles. After preconditioning, specimens were pulled to failure at a normalized displacement rate of 400% of the measured gauge length per minute. The ultimate failure load and mechanism of failure were recorded for each specimen. Results: The mean ultimate load to failure for screw fixation (226 ± 114 N; 95% CI, 147-305 N) was not significantly different from that for suture button fixation (266 ± 73 N; 95% CI, 216-317 N) ( P = .257). The mean strain at failure for screw fixation (63% ± 21%; 95% CI, 48%-77%) was not significantly different from that for suture button fixation (86% ± 26%; 95% CI, 69%-104%) ( P = .060). The most common mechanism of failure for the screw fixation method was at the bone block drill holes, while an intramuscular rupture at the clamp-muscle interface occurred for the suture button construct. Conclusion: The screw and suture button fixation techniques exhibited comparable biomechanical strength for coracoid bone block fixation of the Latarjet procedure. Clinical Relevance: Metal screws have been reported to be a large contributor to intraoperative and postoperative complications. Therefore, given the results of the current study, a suture button construct may be an alternative to metal screw fixation during the Latarjet procedure. However, further clinical studies are warranted.