Search

Background: Specialist palliative care (SPC) services in Ireland are well developed by international standards. However, standardized information on all patients of SPC services is not collected so the proportion of patients seen with a noncancer diagnosis is just an estimate at 5%. Aims: To describe Irish SPC services' provision for, and attitudes to noncancer patients. Method: Postal questionnaire of clinical managers of all SPC services listed in the directory of SPC services in Ireland, September 2005. Results: Sixty-five questionnaires were returned representing a 100% response rate. Twenty four percent (n = 15) of services limited availability for noncancer patients in some way. Of those services available for noncancer patients, the type of care provided to them was the same as for cancer patients in 81% of services (n = 50). The percentage of all patients seen in 2004 who had a noncancer diagnosis was 7.21%. Only 68% (n = 42) of services had a written referral policy. The top three perceived barriers by SPC service providers were the unpredictable noncancer disease trajectory (mean intensity = 6.77), the resultant difficulties with developing referral criteria (mean intensity = 6.38) and the lack of noncancer disease specific expertise (mean intensity = 5.96). Discussion: There is a mismatch between availability of palliative care services for noncancer patients and uptake. The noncancer disease trajectory continues to be considered a barrier to care. Imaginative models of care need to be developed that are not prognosis based. Palliative Medicine 2008; 22: 77—83

Introduction: The effective management of pain requires a multidisciplinary approach. Previous studies have suggested that around 8% of cancer patients will require interventional techniques from an anaesthetist with special interest in pain management to maximize pain control, although this percentage may increase in the cohort of patients with difficult pain syndromes under the care of specialist palliative care services. We wished to determine the experiences and views of other palliative care physicians with regard to input from specialists in pain management. Method: A postal questionnaire was sent to the consultant members of the Association of Palliative Medicine. Results: Most respondents had access to ‘as-required’ anaesthetist consultations with 72% of respondents feeling that the frequency of consultation was adequate. However, over half of the respondents had used the services of a pain management specialist less than four times in the past year and a quarter of respondents had not been involved in a joint consultation with an anaesthetist in the past year. All respondents felt that the pain management specialist's role included advice on technical procedures but less than 25% felt that their role should extend to advice on prescribing analgesics. Discussion: There are likely to be several reasons for this apparent underutilization of specialist anaesthetist/pain management services. This survey has identified possible factors including lack of formal arrangements, lack of suitable experience and the attitudes of palliative medicine consultants.