Search

Background: The conventional operative method to treat an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) is through bone marrow stimulation (BMS). Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) is being used as an alternative option in cases with a large OLT, accompanying subchondral cyst, and/or failed BMS. We aimed to compare the intermediate-term clinical and radiologic results between medial and lateral OLTs after an AOT procedure., Methods: Among the patients who underwent AOT, 45 cases with at least 3 years' follow-up were included in this retrospective study. We had 15 cases of lateral lesions and selected 30 cases of medial lesions matched for age and gender. Lateral lesions were resurfaced without an osteotomy; medial lesion resurfacing was combined with a medial malleolar osteotomy. Clinical assessment was performed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Radiographic assessment included the irregularity of articular surface (subchondral plate), the progression of degenerative arthritis, and the change of the talar tilt., Results: The mean FAOS and FAAM scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups. Up to 1 year postoperatively, there was significant difference in FAAM scores between the both groups (mean 75.3 points in medial group and 87.2 points in lateral group, P  < .001). Delayed union or malunion of the malleolar osteotomy was found in 4 cases (13%) in the medial group. In addition, the progression of joint degeneration was observed in 3 cases (10%) in the medial group. There were no significant differences in the irregularity of articular surface and the change of talar tilt between both groups., Conclusion: A comparison between medial and lateral OLTs treated with AOT demonstrated comparable intermediate-term clinical outcomes. However, patients with medial OLT required a longer period to restore ability for daily and sport activities. In addition, we found more complications and higher rate of progression in the radiologic arthritis grade after medial malleolar osteotomy., Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective comparative study.

Background:: We compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of moderate and severe hallux valgus treated by extended distal chevron osteotomy (EDCO) and distal soft tissue release (DSTR)., Methods:: We performed a retrospective analysis comparing the utility of EDCO for the treatment of moderate (36 patients, 46 feet) and severe (36 patients, 42 feet) hallux valgus. The radiologic outcomes were evaluated based on the preoperative and 3-year follow-up x-rays. The clinical results were investigated based on the 3-year follow-up Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications., Results:: The mean postoperative intermetatarsal angle, hallux valgus angle, tibial sesamoid position, and relative metatarsal bone length were significantly different compared with the preoperative values for both the moderate and severe groups ( P < .001). At 3-year follow-up, intergroup differences were observed in the mean postoperative intermetatarsal angle ( P = .001), hallux valgus angle ( P = .003), and tibial sesamoid position ( P = .013); however, mean radiographic results were within the normal range for both groups. There were no intergroup differences for either the first metatarsal bone length ( P = .172) or shortening ( P = .621). No significant difference in MOXFQ ( P = .525) was evident between the groups at 3-year follow-up. In satisfaction analysis, 82.6% of the moderate group reported good to excellent results, as did 81.0% of the severe group ( P = .815). A total of 7 complications were reported in each group ( P = 1.000)., Conclusion:: The present study showed that midterm mean radiographic results of both moderate and severe hallux valgus treated by EDCO with DSTR were favorable, and those values were within the normal range. Clinical outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups, including overall efficacy. Based on these results, we recommend EDCO with DSTR as an efficient and reliable operative option for both moderate and severe hallux valgus., Level of Evidence:: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Background:: We compared the radiographic results and clinical outcomes of patients operated on via the extended sinus tarsi approach (ESTA) and the extended lateral approach (ELA) for treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures., Methods:: We retrospectively studied the utility of the ELA (46 patients, 52 feet) and the ESTA (56 patients, 64 feet) in patients operated on between January 2009 and March 2015. We evaluated pre- and postoperative x-rays and computed tomography (CT) data. Pain, patient-reported functional outcomes, satisfaction, and postoperative complications were investigated at the 3-year follow-up., Results:: Neither the postoperative nor 3-year follow-up Böhler angles, nor the calcaneal width, differed significantly between the 2 groups (both P > .05). However, the maximum step-off of the posterior facet on the 3-month CT follow-up of the ESTA group was significantly less than that of the ELA group ( P < .05). We found no significant between-group differences in terms of postoperative translation ( P = .232) or angulation ( P = .132) of the sustentacular fragment on the 3-month CT follow-up. At the 3-year follow-up, we found no significant between-group difference in the mean visual analog scale pain score at rest ( P = .641) or during weightbearing ( P = .525). We found no significant between-group difference in the Foot Function Index (FFI) ( P = .712) or self-reported satisfaction ( P = .823). The ELA group experienced significantly more wound complications ( P = .041) and nonunions ( P = .041) than the ESTA group. Four instances of superficial peroneal nerve injury were reported in the ESTA group ( P = .127)., Conclusion:: Compared with the ELA, the ESTA afforded comparable, favorable radiological results and clinical outcomes, associated with fewer wound complications and nonunions. We suggest that the ESTA is an effective operative option when treating displaced, intraarticular calcaneal fractures., Level of Evidence:: Level III, comparative study.