Search

Introduction Varicose veins (VV) negatively impact quality of life (QoL) and have risks of major complications including bleeding, ulceration and phlebitis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the VSGBI (Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland) and GIRFT (Get It Right First Time) classified VVs as lowest priority for intervention. Objective This study aims to determine harm caused and the impact on the QoL on patients waiting for their VVs procedures for more than 1 year. Methods This was a prospective study conducted at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH). Patients with VVs awaiting intervention for >1 year were included in the study. Patients with CEAP C6 disease were considered to be too high risk to be invited for treatment during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients were sent QoL questionnaires and underwent a telephone consultation to assess harm. Both generic (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D) and disease-specific (AVVQ and CIVIQ-14) instruments were utilised. There were no control groups available for comparison. Results 275 patients were identified (37.1% male) with median time on waiting list of 60 weeks (IQR 56–65). 19 patients (6.9%) came to major harm, including phlebitis (3.6%), bleeding (1.8%) and ulceration (1.8%). Fifty-two patients (18.9%) had minor harm, including worsening pain (12.7%) and swelling (6.2%). 6.9% reported psychological harm. Rising CEAP stage was also associated with worsening level of harm in patients with C5-6 disease ( p < 0.0001). Only 8.7% stated they would decline surgery during the pandemic. 104 QoL questionnaires were returned. Median EQ-VAS and EQ-5D was 75 (IQR: 60–85) and 0.685 (0.566–0.761), respectively. Median AVVQ score was 23.2 (14.9–31.0) and CIVIQ-14 score was 33 (21–44). ConclusionsThis study highlights the impact of delaying VVs surgery during a pandemic. A significant rate of both major and minor as well as psychological harm was reported. In addition, VVs had a significant detriment to quality of life.

Ascertainment bias is a well-recognized source of bias in research, but few studies have systematically analyzed sources of ascertainment bias in randomized trials in which blinding is not possible and endpoint assessment is not protocolized. In the current study, we sought to evaluate differences in the clinical practice patterns of trial investigators with respect to bias in the ascertainment of pre-revascularization patient risk and the incidence of secondary endpoints post-revascularization. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of active investigators ( n = 936) from the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial. The total survey response rate was 19.6% (183/936). Vascular surgeons were more likely than nonsurgical interventionalists to order tests for cardiac complications after both surgical bypass ( p < 0.001) and endovascular revascularization ( p = 0.038). Post-procedure, investigators were more likely to order additional testing for cardiac complications in open surgery versus endovascular cases (7% vs 16% never, 41% vs 65% rarely, 43% vs 17% sometimes, 9% vs 2% always, respectively; p < 0.0001). Significant variation in practice patterns exist in the pre- and post-procedure assessment of cardiac risk and events for patients with CLI undergoing revascularization. Variation in the ascertainment of risk and outcomes according to the type of revascularization procedure and physician specialty should be considered when interpreting the results of clinical studies, such as the BEST-CLI trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02060630

Lower limb arterial calcification associates with poor cardiovascular outcomes. The gold standard method of assessment is via computed tomography, yet duplex is our primary imaging modality. Currently, there is no standardized objective assessment of lower limb arterial calcification using duplex. We aimed to define the role of duplex in the assessment of lower limb arterial calcification. Initial consensus was achieved between a cohort of vascular scientists on objective imaging specific markers of lower limb arterial calcification severity using duplex. This resulted in objective descriptions to grade calcification from 0 to 3 (no calcification through to severe calcification) which formed the duplex lower limb arterial calcification score. Reproducibility of the duplex lower limb arterial calcification score was assessed and further validation was undertaken by comparing the duplex lower limb arterial calcification with computed tomography–based assessment in a separate cohort of 44 patients investigated with both modalities. The intra- and inter-class correlation coefficient were > 0.87 . The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the duplex and CT based arterial calcium measurements was (ρ = 0.644, P < .001). The duplex lower limb arterial calcification score provides a standardized and reproducible modality for assessment of lower limb arterial calcification and may aid with risk stratification in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Introduction: The iliac bifurcated device (IBD) is an innovative endovascular device for aortoiliac aneurysm repair. The objective of this study is to provide further evidence on the efficacy and safety of the device. Study Design: Case series study with retrospective analysis of prospectively collected nonrandomized data. Methods: Between 2007 and 2010, all consecutive IBD placements were analyzed. The main outcomes included (1) technical failure; (2) morbidity and mortality; and (3) late outcomes. Prospective follow-up was performed by interval computed tomography scanning. Results: In all, 27 consecutive patients had elective placement of 28 IBDs. Mean operating time was 251.1 ± 65.4 minutes, mean fluoroscopy time was 63.9 ± 27.2 minutes, and mean contrast volume used was 186.2 ± 106.7 mL. Periprocedural type I endoleak occurred in 2 patients. No aneurysm-related adverse events were recorded. Conclusion: We demonstrate that IBDs can be used in patients with aortoiliac aneurysms and are associated with satisfactory medium-term results as expressed by high patency and low reintervention rates.