1. Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.
- Author
-
Michlitsch MG, Adamson GJ, Pink M, Estess A, Shankwiler JA, and Lee TQ
- Subjects
- Biomechanical Phenomena physiology, Cadaver, Humans, Random Allocation, Acromioclavicular Joint surgery, Orthopedic Procedures methods, Shoulder Injuries, Transplantation, Autologous
- Abstract
Background: Most surgical reconstructions of the separated acromioclavicular joint do not address the injured ligaments and capsule of the acromioclavicular joint., Purpose: This study was undertaken to compare the biomechanical characteristics of a modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction and an intramedullary acromioclavicular joint reconstruction that uses a free-tissue graft for reconstruction of both the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: Each pair of 6 matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders was randomly selected for a modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction on 1 side and the contralateral side was used for free-tissue graft reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligamentous complexes. Anterior-posterior and superior-inferior acromioclavicular joint translation (in millimeters) was measured with acromioclavicular joint compressions of 10, 20, and 30 N, and with translational loads of 10 and 15 N both before and after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Load-to-failure testing was then performed for each construct. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (translational testing) and Wilcoxon signed rank test (load-to-failure testing), both with P = .05, were used for statistical analysis., Results: Mean anterior-posterior and superior-inferior translation of the intramedullary acromioclavicular joint reconstruction was significantly less than that of the modified Weaver-Dunn under all loading conditions (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively), but was not significantly different from that of the intact state (P = .656 and P = .173, respectively). Although the mean ultimate and yield loads and linear stiffness for the intramedullary acromioclavicular reconstruction were greater than that of the modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction, this did not reach statistical significance (P = .625, P = .625, and P = .625, respectively)., Conclusion: Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with free-tissue graft for both the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligamentous complexes demonstrates initial stability significantly better than a modified Weaver-Dunn and similar to that of intact specimens., Clinical Relevance: This acromioclavicular joint reconstruction provides the surgeon with a relatively nondestructive option.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF