Search

Cancer care involves many ethical issues. The need for more patient-centered healthcare together with the improved empowerment of every person diagnosed with cancer have been transposed by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and eventually translated in the Ragusa statement. This position paper describes the philosophy that lies beneath this document and its fundamental principles.

For decades Western medicine has followed a biomedical model based on linear thinking and an individualized, disease-oriented doctor-patient relationship. Today this framework must be replaced by a biopsychosocial model based on complexity theory and a person-oriented medical team-patient relationship, taking into account the psychological and social determinants of health and disease. However, the new model is already proving no longer adequate or appropriate, and current events are urging us to develop an ecological model in which the medical team takes into account both individual illness and population health as a whole, since we are all part of the biosphere. In recent years, the rising costs of cancer treatment have raised a serious issue of economic sustainability. As the population of our planet, we now need to rapidly address this issue, and everyone of us must try to reduce their ecological footprint, measured as CO2 production. Medical oncologists need to reduce the ecological footprint of their professional activity by lowering the consumption of economic resources and avoiding environmental damage as much as possible. This new paradigm is endorsed by the Italian College of Hospital Medical Oncology Directors (CIPOMO). A working group of this organization has drafted the "Green Oncology Position Paper": a proposal of Italian medical oncology (in accordance with international guidelines) that oncologists, while aiming for the same end results, make a commitment toward the more appropriate management of health care and the careful use of resources in order to protect the environment and the ecosphere during the daily exercise of their professional activities.

Aims and background We conducted a feasibility study to determine the safety and efficacy of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet) and vinorelbine in previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients and methods Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks were given until disease progression, sever toxicity or up to 9 cycles. All patients underwent tumor assessment before enrollment. Patients with a life expectancy longer than 3 months and measurable or assessable disease were eligible. Results Twenty-one patients were included. Median number of treatment cycles was 5 (range, 3–9). No complete response was obtained. Stable disease and/or partial response was obtained in 9 patients. Fifteen patients experienced grade 3–4 leukopenia. There was no significant decline in cardiac function. Non-hematological toxicity was tolerable (grade 1–2). Conclusions The association of doxorubicin and vinorelbine has been shown to be feasible in previously treated advanced breast cancer patients. Its efficacy should be tested as first-line therapy in metastatic patients with cardiac co-morbidities.

Aims and Background We evaluated the activity in terms of time to progression (TTP) of mitomycin C and capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy. Methods Patients with advanced colorectal cancer undergoing third-line chemotherapy after failure of 5-FU with CPT-11 or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens were treated with capecitabine and mitomycin C. Results Sixty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 55 years (range, 26-78 years) and the male:female ratio 21: 40. We observed partial remissions in 5 patients (8%), stable disease in 25 patients (40%) and progression of disease in 31 patients (52%). Median TTP was 3 months and median survival was 6 months. Global toxicity was mild and entirely acceptable. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity occurred in 12 patients and grade 3-4 nonhematological toxicity in 5 patients. Conclusions The combination of capecitabine and mitomycin C could represent an effective and manageable treatment option for colorectal cancer patients failing previous chemotherapy regimens.

Aims and Background Rarely are conclusions from clinical trials summarized in international consensus conferences and promptly transferred to patient care. The adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer used in daily clinical practice in Italy is described and compared with the recommendations of the 1990 NIH Consensus Conference. Patients and Methods We audited prescriptions of adjuvant systemic therapies for Italian colorectal cancer patients in 82 centers during a fixed one-week period. Results Among 434 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy there were 139 (42.5%) colon cancer patients with N- and 169 (51.7%) with N+ regional nodal involvement. Treatment at academic centers, a young age, T4 and a low total number of lymph nodes removed at surgery were the factors potentially justifying the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients. The most common chemotherapy used was a bolus of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid for 6 months (75.8%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was not administered to 37 (38.5%) of 96 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer. Conclusions The study shows that a substantial proportion of patients on adjuvant treatment at a certain time point in a large enough sample of Italian centers are stage II (potential over-treatment) and that an under-treatment of stage II and III rectal cancer patients (lack of radiotherapy) occurs too often in daily clinical practice in this country.

The 45th Annual Meeting of the Italian Cancer Society (SIC), held at the Centro Congressi Giovanni XXIII in Bergamo, Italy on 9-12 November, 2003, attracted almost 400 participants. The Scientific Committee chaired by R Giavazzi (Mario Negri Institute, Bergamo) and the board of the Italian Cancer Society produced a packed and varied program. Plenary sessions with keynote speakers (24 lectures) were combined with oral proffered papers (20 selected presentations), providing a platform from laboratory science to clinical interventions. Two hundred and sixty-one abstracts were submitted to the conference and presented in poster and poster discussion sessions, providing a stimulating ground for discussion and a network of interactive collaboration among young investigators. The venue of Bergamo offered exceptional hospitality with social events in the beautiful old town and at the Modern Art Museum. We hope that the following report gives an idea of the event and will encourage the reader to attend the 46th meeting of the SIC, 24-26 October, 2004 in Pisa.

The “Misura” project is a retrospective survey, with the aim to evaluate how 5FU is used in the treatment of colorectal cancer in clinical practice in Italian oncology departments. Twenty-four centers participated. Patients seen in the second half of 1998 with colorectal cancer and treated with 5FU were analyzed. Observed patients were 664, 45.9% of patients presented metastatic disease. Biochemical modulation with folinic acid and bolus 5FU was the most used schedule (59%). The De Gramont (LV 5FU2) regimen, alone or with other cytotoxic drugs, was the second most chosen schedule (14%). The most frequent side effect observed was gastrointestinal toxicity. No hematological toxicity was demonstrated in 68.8% of patients. Cutaneous toxicity occurred in 21.1% of patients. 5FU is widely used independently by the stage of disease. In palliative treatment a variety of schedules were administered by the Italian centers, lacking a standard therapy. There are very few surveys investigating oncology clinical practice. A larger survey on this issue is auspicable.

Aims and background The phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of combined oxaliplatin (L-OHP), continuous infusion (CI) ± bolus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and levo-folinic acid (IFA) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after one or more lines of 5FU-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods We designed two contemporary studies: in the former we enrolled patients previously treated with 1 line of chemotherapy, and in the latter, patients previously treated with 2, 3 and 4 lines. Seventy-six consecutive patients were enrolled: 45 received L-OHP (85 mg/m2 iv 2 h on day 1) + I-FA (100 mg/m2 iv 2 h on days 1 and 2) + 5FU iv bolus (400 mg/m2 days 1 and 2) + 5FU (600 mg/m2 CI 22 h days 1 and 2 (FOLFOX 4); 31 received L-OHP (100 mg/m2 iv 2 h on day 1) + I-FA (250 mg/m2 iv 2 h on days 1 and 2), followed by 5FU (1500 mg/m2 CI 24 h days 1 and 2 (FOLFOX 2). The treatment was recycled every 2 weeks and continued until progression and/or unacceptable toxicity or patient preference. The primary end point was activity (tumor growth control [TGC]: partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]); the secondary end points were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results Forty-five patients in 2nd line (22 FOLFOX 4, 23 FOLFOX 2), 23 (17 FOLFOX 4, 6 FOLFOX 2) in 3rd, 4 in 4th and 1 in 5th line were assessable; 3 were lost to follow-up. In 15 patients (11 FOLFOX 4, 4 FOLFOX 2), disease involved the liver only. A total of 533 courses were administered with a range of 1-14 in FOLFOX4 and 1-12 in FOLFOX2; dose intensity was 92.85%, and the total dose of the administered L-OHP was 98.29%. As a 2nd line treatment, FOLFOX 4 achieved TGC in 72.8% of the patients (PR, 18.2%; SD, 54.6%), with a median TTP of 6 months and a median OS of 7 months, whereas in the FOLFOX 2 group these figures were 78.3% (PR 21.8%, SD 56.5%), and 5 and 9 months. As a 3rd line treatment, FOLFOX 4 produced TGC in 41.1% of patients (PR 23.5%, SD 17.6%), with a median TTP of 5 months and median OS of 7+ months, whereas FOLFOX 2 obtained respective values of 50% (PR 16.7%, SD 33.3%), 7 and 9 months. As a 4th line of treatment, TGC was achieved in 2 patients (1 PR, 1 SD); the patient in 5th line therapy obtained a SD. With “de Gramont” as the first-line regimen, patients assessable were 24 in FOLFOX 4 and 18 in FOLFOX 2. In the former population, TGC was 70.8% (PR 37.5%, SD 33.3%), with a TTP of 6 months and OS of 10 months, whereas with FOLFOX2 these values were 61.1% (PR 5.6%, SD 55.5), 5 and 7 months. In patients with liver involvement only, FOLFOX 4 obtained TGC in 63.6% of cases (with a TTP of 7 months and OS of 6+ months), FOLFOX 2 in 100% (with a TTP of 9.5 months and OS of 13.5+ months). Both schedules exhibited an acceptable toxicity: neurologic, hematologic and hepatic grade 3 side effects occurred in a limited number of patients, with a higher frequency in the FOLFOX 2 group. Conclusions Treatment with L-OHP, CI ± bolus 5FU and I-FA was well tolerated. The activity in terms of TGC was interesting and comparable with results reported in the literature for the standard treatment for 2nd line, i.e. irinotecan alone. Treatment was effective in 2nd line and in patients previously treated with more than two chemotherapy lines; in particular, treatment was active in patients with hepatic disease only. Although the two schedules seemed to achieve the same benefit with the same tolerance, we could not define from the study the better regime.

Tumors of the small intestine are rare and usually occur in association with genetic disease and chronic intestinal inflammation. We report three cases of small bowel adenocarcinoma in patients affected by celiac disease who received a safe chemotherapy regimen (FOLFOX IV or LV5FU2) after tumor resection.

5-fluorouracil, an antimetabolite inhibiting timidilate synthetase, is one of the most used drugs in the treatment of many solid tumor types. In particular it is still central in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Nevertheless 5-FU efficency is limited, this is due to the rapidity of its metabolism (T1/2 10 min). Many attempts have been done to increase its efficency: 1) combinations with other antitumor drugs have been tested, but no one showed improved response rates with respect to 5-FU alone; 2) use of biological modifiers such as folinic acid and methotrexate. They interact with the biological actions of 5-FU improving its therapeutic effects. These combinations appear to be more effective than 5-FU alone; 3) continuous infusion increases the percentage of susceptible tumor cells, it makes possible the use of a high intensity dose which is active in patients resistant to 5-FU administered as bolus-injection. There are many schedules and methods of administration of 5-FU in the treatment of CRC, each of them showing different types of toxicities. This explains why there is the need to obtain a profile of 5-FU in clinical practice. The project called MISURA is thought to give us this kind of information. It will be a collection of data regarding patients affected by colorectal cancer and treated with 5-FU. The collected information will be about diagnosis; ways of use, schedules, doses and tolerability of the drug; obtained responses. The aims of the study are: 1) to evaluate the use of 5-FU in clinical practice; 2) to collect data about the use of supportive therapy; 3) to know the effective incidence and prevalence of CRC in Italy. The study is retrospective, the sample consists of all patients from the oncological departments chosen to represent the national territory. The analysis of the data will be descriptive.

Aims and Backgroud The clinical use of cisplatin (CDDP)„ one of the most active agents in advanced ovarian cancer, is limited by nephrotoxicity and cumulative neurotoxicity. In preclinical studies, reduced glutathione (GSH) demonstrated a protective action against CDDP nephrotoxicity. We treated 20 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, with polichemotherapy containing CDDP + GSH, to assess the protective action of GSH against CDDP nephrotoxicity. Methods Between January 1988 and December 1989, 20 patients, with advanced ovarian carcinoma (St. III-IV-FIGO), not pretreated received CDDP: 45 mg/m2 i.v., on day 1-2, + cyclophosphamide (CPA): 900 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2 + GSH 2500 mg i.v. in normal saline 100 ml (in 15 min), before CDDP, every 21-28 days. Results A pathologic complete response rate (PCR) of 55 % (11/20) was observed (7/14 patients with bulky disease). Median survival was 26.5 months and 5 patients were still alive and disease free at 35 months. Toxicity was limited, without any case of nephrotoxicity. Conclusions On the basis of our previous experience with the same regimen without GSH, this study suggests that also in the clinical setting, GSH has no negative interference on CDDP activity and that GSH might improve the therapeutic index of CDDP. However, our data need to be confirmed by large randomized clinical studies.

During a 3-year period at our hospital, 54 consecutively observed patients with parametric, locally advanced, metastatic gastric carcinoma were treated with fluorouracil + adriaiiiycin + mitomycin C. Of 47 evaluable patients, 44.6% had an objective response (complete + partial response) and 29.7% had stabilized disease. The median duration of response was 7.5 months. The median survival was 8.9 months for all patients. In particular, the survival of responders (>12 months) and of patients with stabilized disease (8.6 months) was significantly longer than that of patients with progressive disease (4.5 months). Toxicity was limited and reversible, which allowed treatment also of patients in poor general condition (PS 3–4 of the Zubrod scale).