Search

Purpose: Produce expert recommendations regarding the optimal use of Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) when treating femoro-popliteal steno-occlusive peripheral artery disease (PAD), guiding operators to use Shockwave IVL., Materials and Methods: A modified 3-step Delphi process was used to gain consensus surrounding preoperative/intraoperative/postoperative considerations when using Shockwave IVL for femoro-popliteal PAD. This included a structured survey, focus-group (with qualitative thematic analysis of views expressed), and final confirmatory round; participants were recruited across Europe including the United Kingdom/Switzerland., Results: Following a review to inform an online survey, 25 experts took part in a survey (5 European countries, 2023), followed by a focus-group (15 participants), 9 interviews, and final confirmatory round. A list of recommendations was prepared where at least moderate-level or high-level agreement was reached (≥70% participants agreeing). The recommendations relate to the optimal preoperative imaging, preoperative preparation(s), intraoperative imaging and use of adjuncts, as well as postoperative course, when using Shockwave IVL., Conclusion: A list of expert recommendations is provided guiding the optimal use of Shockwave IVL in femoro-popliteal PAD. This will help operators achieve better clinical outcomes., Clinical Impact: This pan-European panel of experts using intravascular lithotripsy in routine peripheral arterial disease endovascular practice has provided important insights into best care practices before, during, and after such procedures. Several recommendations have been produced based on a structured consensus process to guide clinicians globally. This will improve and standardise the use of this technology in the femoro-popliteal arterial segment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.S received honoraria and lecture fees/consulting for Shockwave, Abbott, Cook; educational grant support from Cook; research funding from Shockwave, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Angiodroid. N.T received honoraria and lecture fees/consulting for Shockwave, Philips, and Boston Scientific.

Purpose: To examine the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) severity and duration with cardiovascular mortality, following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease, and whether it is AKI in itself that confers an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality., Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data obtained between 2014 and 2019 from 3 vascular centers. Renal function was followed up for a minimum of 90 days. Electronic records were queried to establish a cause of death, where applicable. Patients were excluded if unable to provide written informed consent or if presenting with acute limb ischemia. Primary outcomes were the hazard ratios for cardiovascular death (AKI patients vs no AKI; no AKI vs stage 1 AKI vs stage 3 AKI; and no AKI vs transient AKI vs established AKI). Propensity score-matched analysis was used to establish whether developing AKI, in patients with similar demographics and procedural characteristics, is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death., Results: Overall 239 patients developed AKI, and this was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (hazard risk [HR]: 4.3, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.1-6.8, pairwise comparison p value=0.006]. This was dependent on the severity of the AKI stage (HR 5.4, 95% CI: 2.4-7.3, pairwise comparison p value=0.01) and duration (HR 4.2, 95% CI: 2.3-6.2, pairwise comparison p value=0.04). The propensity score-matched analysis showed that even when patients are matched for comorbidity and procedural characteristics, AKI confers an increased risk of mortality (p=0.04)., Conclusions: Acute kidney injury is common after femoropopliteal endovascular therapy. It confers an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular mortality, which is still present when renal decline is transient, and highest for patients with established decline in renal function., Clinical Impact: This is the first study in the setting of peripheral arterial disease to show that acute kidney injury has an adverse effect on cardiovascular mortality, in the long-term, that is dependent on its severity, and present even when the AKI is transient. We have also shown that this difference in cardiovascular mortality becomes more pronounced from the medium-term, and thus closer follow-up of these patients is required., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Endovascular stenting of the deep venous system has been proposed as a method to treat patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of this treatment at 1-year following the development of dedicated venous stents., Method and Results: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies evaluating the effectiveness of venous stent placement. Data were extracted by disease pathogenesis: non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute thrombotic (DVT), or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Main outcomes included technical success, stent patency at 1 year and symptom relief. A total of 49 studies reporting outcomes in 5154 patients (NIVL, 1431; DVT, 950; PTS, 2773) were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rates were comparable among groups (97%-100%). There were no periprocedural deaths. Minor bleeding was reported in up to 5% of patients and major bleeding in 0.5% upon intervention. Transient back pain was noted in 55% of PTS patients following intervention. There was significant heterogeneity between studies reporting outcomes in PTS patients. Primary and cumulative patency at 1 year was: NIVL-96% and 100%; DVT-91% and 97%; PTS (stents above the ligament)-77% and 94%, and; PTS (stents across the ligament)-78% and 94%. There were insufficient data to compare patency outcomes of dedicated and nondedicated venous stents in patients with acute DVT. In NIVL and PTS patients, stent patency was comparable at 1 year. There was inconsistency in the use of validated tools for the measurement of symptoms before and after intervention. When reported, venous claudication, improved in 83% of PTS patients and 90% of NIVL patients, and ulcer healing occurred in 80% of PTS patients and 32% of NIVL patients., Conclusions: The first generation of dedicated venous stents perform comparably in terms of patency and clinical outcomes to non-dedicated technologies at 1 year for the treatment of patients with NIVL and PTS. However, significant heterogeneity exists between studies and standardized criteria are urgently needed to report outcomes in patients undergoing deep venous stenting.

Purpose: To report the outcomes of surgical (ST), endovascular (ET), and hybrid (HT) treatment in cancer patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI)., Materials and Methods: A multicenter retrospective registry collected 139 patients (mean age 72.3±12.4 years; 73 men) with ALI and active malignancy treated by ET (41, 29%), ST (70, 51%), or HT (28, 20%) in 7 European centers between July 2007 and February 2019. In 22 cases (16%) ALI was the first manifestation of the malignancy. Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis (38, 27%). The primary composite outcome was amputation-free survival (AFS). Overall survival, amputation-free time (AFT), and reintervention-free time (RFT) were also assessed. Cox regression analysis was applied to identify independent risk factors for the primary and secondary outcomes. Results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: ET was associated with improved 12-month AFS compared with both ST (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.28, p=0.002) and HT (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.18, p=0.008). ST (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.53, p=0.003) and HT (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.45 to 6.65, p<0.001) were related to an increased risk for mortality compared with ET. At 12 months, the AFT was similar between the 3 groups (ET vs ST: HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.51 to 4.53, p=0.45 and ET vs HT: HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.36 to 4.11, p=0.73). The 12-month RFT also did not differ significantly between the 3 treatment options (ET vs ST: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.46, p=0.79 and ET vs HT: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.17, p=0.19). ST and/or HT increased the risk for the major amputation and/or death (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.05, p=0.03), while Rutherford class I ischemia (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.90, p=0.04) and previous vascular interventions on the index limb (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.97, p=0.04) showed a protective effect., Conclusion: In patients with ALI and active malignant disease, ET was associated with increased AFS and overall survival compared with both ST and HT, while the limb salvage and reintervention rates were comparable among the 3 groups.

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility and early results of endoanchoring (endostapling) using a new commercially available device as an adjunctive procedure during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with an unfavorable proximal neck., Methods: Between June 2010 and May 2012, 13 consecutive patients (all men; median age 73 years, range 62-82) were prospectively enrolled in a 2-center registry to follow outcomes of adjunctive primary endoanchoring (Aptus HeliFX Aortic Securement System) of the proximal endograft to enhance proximal graft fixation and sealing during EVAR. Indications for proximal neck endoanchoring included at least one of the following: neck angulation 45° to 90°, length 8 to 15 mm, diameter 29 to 33 mm, conical neck configuration, or an irregularly shaped neck. The median AAA diameter was 56 mm (range 50-98). The Endurant stent-graft was implanted in 4 patients and the Zenith device in 9., Results: A median of 4 endoanchors were implanted per patient (range 3-10) in adjunctive procedures that required a median 12 minutes (range 7-20). Intraoperatively, 2 proximal type I endoleaks were present following endoanchor implantation (85% primary technical success); a cuff was deployed in 1 case, which successfully sealed the endoleak (92% assisted primary technical success). The second proximal type I endoleak was minute and sealed spontaneously within 30 days. No further major device-related complications occurred intraoperatively. In the 30-day perioperative period, the only procedure-related complications were 2 type II endoleaks, which required no intervention. Over a median follow-up of 7 months (range 2-17), no further complications occurred apart from an asymptomatic internal iliac artery occlusion and a non-lethal myocardial infarction at 9 months. The type II endoleaks spontaneously sealed. No endograft migration was noticed nor loss of endoanchor integrity. No deaths occurred throughout follow-up., Conclusion: Primary endoanchoring using the HeliFX aortic securement system is feasible, and early results were promising in this series.

Isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) are relatively rare; they typically progress asymptomatically and are revealed incidentally, usually after they have acquired significant dimensions. Traditional open reconstruction is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Rupture is a common initial manifestation. Endovascular repair has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative, associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates, even in patients at high surgical risk; some specialists have recently proposed endoluminal repair as the first-choice procedure in suitable anatomies. However, only a few sporadic attempts have been made to define the "suitable" anatomy for endovascular repair. This article proposes a classification of isolated CIAAs and provides endovascular specialists with a guide to deciding which type of repair is feasible and efficacious according to the anatomical configuration of the aneurysm.

Purpose: To report a case in which a persistent high-flow type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of a leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) complicated by an aortocaval fistula was repaired with a stent-graft in the inferior vena cava (IVC)., Case Report: A 76-year-old man underwent emergent EVAR with an aortomonoiliac device to exclude a leaking 9-cm AAA. The 30-day computed tomography (CT) scan showed 2-mm sac expansion and a type II endoleak arising from a lumbar artery; the outflow vessel was the inferior vena cava (IVC) via a fistula that was not depicted on the non-contrast preoperative CT or the intraoperative angiogram. No intervention was deemed necessary at the time. Six months after EVAR, the AAA had not expanded further, but the fistula between the sac and the IVC was larger in diameter. A tubular stent-graft was implanted in the IVC to seal the defect. No complications have been noted up to 36 months after the IVC stent-graft procedure., Conclusion: Aortocaval fistulae should be excluded in the case of persistent type II endoleaks after EVAR for ruptured AAAs. IVC endografting is a minimally invasive alternative to treat such a complication, with promising midterm results in this patient.

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a complex disease with a largely unknown pathophysiological background and a strong genetic component. Various studies have tried to link specific genetic variants with AAA., Methods: Systematic review of the literature (1947-2009)., Results: A total of 249 studies were identified, 89 of which were eventually deemed relevant to this review. Genetic variants (polymorphisms) in a wide variety of genes, most of which encode proteolytic enzymes and inflammatory molecules, have been associated with AAA development and progression., Conclusion: The genetic basis of AAA remains unknown, and most results from ''candidate-gene'' association studies are contradictory. Further analyses in appropriately powered studies in large, phenotypically well-characterized populations, including genome-wide association studies, are necessary to elucidate the exact genetic contribution to the pathophysiology of AAA.

Statins possess several pleiotropic effects and have been shown in vitro and in vivo to inhibit the expression of inflammatory mediators and downregulate molecules involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. Recent observational studies in humans suggest that statins may have a role in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) prevention or may even inhibit aneurysm expansion. In this review, we summarize the effects of statins on the vessel wall of aneurysmal aortas and currently available data concerning their inhibitory effects on aneurysm progression.

Purpose: To report a single-center experience with aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) after successful endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)., Methods: Five patients (all men; mean age 68.4 years, range 60-75) developed an ADF between 18 days to 1 year after successful EVAR using 3 types of commercially available endografts: 1 bifurcated Anaconda, 1 unibody Powerlink, and 3 EndoFit stent-grafts in a tubular (n=1) or aortomonoiliac configuration (n=2). The internal iliac artery was not occluded in any of the cases., Results: Hematemesis and diffuse abdominal pain constituted the main symptoms leading to the diagnosis of ADF, which was confirmed on computed tomography. Infection was the etiology of the ADF in 3 patients; all underwent emergency surgical exploration, but 1 died in hospital; the other 2 have survived from 1 to 3 years after an emergency procedure. The other 2 ADFs developed in patients with large type I endoleaks; 1 patient died before surgery could be performed and the other one 18 hours after laparotomy. All stent-grafts were removed; none displayed any defects., Conclusion: ADF is a rare but dangerous complication of EVAR. The sequela may be primarily attributed to graft infection, as seen in this series. However, the exact pathogenesis of the pathology remains largely unknown. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are crucial to avoid a fatal outcome.

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and midterm results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a tubular stent-graft using 2 different implantation techniques., Methods: Between November 2004 and September 2007, 53 patients (49 men; mean age 68.5+/-8.6 years, range 40-80) were treated with the EndoFit tube stent-graft. The majority (45, 85%) were treated using the trombone technique, in which 2 tubular aortoaortic endografts were deployed with 4 to 8 cm of overlap. This subgroup was compared to the 8 patients who received single tube grafts., Results: Technical and procedural success were 100%; perioperative mortality was 0%. Operative results were similar for patients treated with 1 graft versus those treated with the overlapping trombone technique. The overall device-related complication rate was significantly lower for patients treated with the trombone technique (11% versus 75%, p<0.001). Mean follow-up was 24 months (range 6-36). Endoleak type II occurred in 3 (5.7%) cases. Three (5.7%) patients died, 1 from an aortoduodenal fistula secondary to a proximal type I endoleak and 2 from acute myocardial infarction., Conclusion: The tubular EndoFit device appears both safe and effective in terms of midterm clinical outcome, especially when the trombone technique is utilized. It compares favorably with previously reported EVAR results.

Purpose: To report a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and midterm clinical results of the Anaconda stent-graft in the endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms., Methods: Fifty-one patients (48 men; mean age 71+/-8 years, range 62-89) were treated with the Anaconda stent-graft from January 2006 to September 2007. Six patients were considered at high risk for open repair (defined as ASA grade 3) and 10 had undergone previous laparotomy. The mean neck diameter and length were 26 mm (range 22-30) and 18.5 mm (range 14-35), respectively. Mean proximal neck angulation was 30 degrees (range 5-60). Severe iliac artery tortuosity (>60 degrees ) was seen in 20 (39%) patients; 3 (6%) had a proximal aneurysm neck angle >45 degrees., Results: The technical success rate was 100%; intraprocedurally, 7 (14%) stent-grafts were repositioned to address renal artery occlusion by the graft (n = 1) or type I endoleak. This maneuver resolved 6 of the 7 situations; a remaining endoleak required a proximal cuff to seal it. The procedural success rate (no major complication at 30 days) was 94%. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range 1-21). Five (10%) endoleaks (1 type I, 4 type II) and 1 (2%) graft migration occurred. The overall reintervention rate was 6%. Two (4%) patients died in late follow-up., Conclusion: The Anaconda stent-graft appears both safe and effective in terms of midterm clinical outcome and compares favorably with previously reported EVAR results. The ability to reposition the stent-graft is a particular advantage.