The influence of visual experience on spatial imagery is still not fully understood. Although numerous experiments have been interpreted as showing considerable limitations in the functioning of imagery processes in people who are totally blind, especially those who were born blind or had early onset of blindness, there are studies suggesting that no significant differences in this area can be detected between blindfolded sighted and nonsighted individuals. There are claims that in some cases persons deprived of visual experience perform better than blindfolded sighted individuals (for a review, see Cattaneo et al., 2008). The differences in the results of the experiments reported in this and in other sources seem to follow from the specificity of the imagery task rather than from the imagery operation (mental imagery activity) being tested (see, for example, Cornoldi & Vecchi, 2003). Testing imagery scaling operations may serve as an example. Mental scaling transformation is an operation that involves changing the size of an image found, for example, when sighted persons compare objects (Larsen & Bundesen, 1978). The reaction time increased with the size ratio of objects (see also Bennett & Warren, 2002; Craddock & Lawson, 2009). Some research suggests that adults without prior visual experience do not understand that the size of an object imagined to be moving away must be reduced in accordance with the principle of perspective (Arditi, Holtzman, & Kosslyn, 1988; Vanlierde & Wanet-Defalque, 2005). There is, however, research providing evidence that it is unlikely that these difficulties result from an inability to perform the operation of mental scaling (Kennedy, 1993; Wnuczko & Kennedy, 2014). For clarity of argumentation, it is important to distinguish between linear size (which can, for example, be measured in centimeters), and angular size. The linear size of a particular object is an objective property that does not change over time. The ability to evaluate the linear size can therefore be treated as an indication of conceptual knowledge related to typical sizes of objects encountered in the real world. These sizes may change only in fantasy (for example, in Alice in Wonderland). In visual perception, the angular size--that is, the angle at which the observed object subtends at the eye--changes with the distance between the object and the observer. Angular size is usually measured in degrees of the arc, although in some research it was shown by pointing to the ends of the imagined object. In those cases the pointing span indicated the angular size (see, for example, Arditi et al., 1988). In visual perception, identical objects placed at different distances from the observer create images on the retina that differ in size. It is also possible to determine the changing pointing span for these objects. The size differences are reflected in verbal descriptions: a lake observed from an airplane may be compared to a puddle, and a dog observed from a distance may seem as small as an ant. We get this impression despite being aware that the linear size of these objects does not change (this is the mechanism of size constancy). Visual angular size has its analogy in imagery. Kosslyn (1978) defines angular size as the visual angle of the mind's eye, and provides empirical evidence that sighted persons imagine objects as being a certain distance away from the mind's eye. Sighted persons first experience size constancy in infancy (Slater, Mattock, & Brown, 1990). This constancy, functioning as automatic inference, makes it possible to assess the linear size of an object on the basis of its optical size and the distance. The accuracy of the inference involved in the process of visual perception improves gradually, and at early school age is not yet fully developed (Granrud & Schmechel, 2006). Developmental progress in understanding the relationship between angular and linear size can be observed in drawings made by sighted children. …