Search

Background: Traumatic thoracic aortic injuries (TAIs) carry a substantial mortality. Our study aim was to evaluate the impact of insurance status on outcomes in severely injured trauma patients after either thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or open repair using the National Trauma Data Bank Research Data Set (NTDB-RDS)., Methods: The NTDB-RDS was reviewed for outcomes in severely injured patients and TAI repair method (TEVAR vs open). Patients were divided into insured (Medicaid, Medicare, private insurance) and uninsured (self-pay) status groups. Patients were further divided by injury severity score (ISS) of 15-24 and ≥25 to adjust for injury burden. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared. Chi-square, t -test, and analysis of variance were used with significance defined as P < .05., Results: Within the NTDB-RDS, a review of nearly 1 million patients led to 241 that underwent repair for TAI and had insurance status and repair type documented. 88.8% (214/241) of patients were insured, while 11.2% (27/241) of patients were uninsured. There were no significant differences in repair type based on insurance status. For open repair with an ISS ≥25, mortality was significantly higher in the uninsured group compared with insured (55.5% vs 21.9%, P = .001)., Conclusion: For open repair in patients with TAI and high injury burden, uninsured status was associated with a significant increase in mortality rate compared with insured patients. Future studies should investigate the effect of insurance type on TAI outcomes and causes of higher mortality in uninsured patients.

This study aimed to identify factors that promote and impede research participation and productivity by Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) surgeons. In addition, the study aimed to determine what changes can be implemented by surgical departments to improve this research productivity and granting. A 25-question anonymous research survey tool was offered to EAST surgeons. The questions analyzed factors including demographics, career accomplishments, current institution type, educational/research background, perceived barriers to research, and current research productivity, including grants. Chi-square tests were used to analyze significance at P < 0.05. The overall response rate was 26.2 per cent (445/1699). Most respondents reported not having any protected research time (86.3%), and no research resources were provided by their institution (78.7%). Factors that were significantly associated with greater research productivity included protected research time ( P < 0.0001), having a mentor ( P < 0.001), practicing in a university-affiliated hospital ( P < 0.0001), publication(s) before completing residency training ( P = 0.02), having institutional resources dedicated to research ( P = 0.015), and male gender ( P = 0.003). Age, race, marital status, and additional educational qualifications were not associated with statistically significant differences in research productivity in this study ( P > 0.05). EAST surgeons are more likely to have scholarly productivity if they are supported with protected time, mentors, nonclinical staff dedicated to research, a history of research before completion of residency, and research resources from their institution. Barriers to research productivity include lack of institutional support, lack of protected research time, and increased regulatory policies.

The effect of timing in patients requiring tracheostomy varies in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of early tracheostomy on outcomes in trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study is a four-year review of trauma patients undergoing tracheostomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on TBI/non-TBI. Each group was divided into three subgroups based on tracheostomy timing: zero to three days, four to seven days, and greater than seven days postadmission. TBI patients were stratified by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and non-TBI patients were stratified by the Injury Severity Score (ISS). The primary outcome was ventilator-free days (VFDs). Significance was defined as P < 0.05. Two hundred eighty-nine trauma patients met the study criteria: 151 had TBI (55.2%) versus 138 (47.8%) non-TBI. There were no significant differences in demographics within and between groups. In TBI patients, statistically significant increases in VFDs were observed with GCS 13 to 15 for tracheostomies performed in four to seven versus greater than seven days ( P = 0.005). For GCS <8 and 8 to 12, there were significant increases in VFDs for tracheostomies performed at days 1 to 3 and 4 to 7 versus greater than seven days ( P ≪ 0.05 for both). For non-TBI tracheostomies, only ISS ≥ 25 with tracheostomies performed at zero to three days versus greater than seven days was associated with improved VFDs. Early tracheostomies in TBI patients were associated with improved VFDs. In trauma patients with no TBI, early tracheostomy was associated with improved VFDs only in patients with ISS ≥ 25. Future research studies should investigate reasons TBI and non-TBI patients may differ.