Search

Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage is one of the major complications after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and is an independent predictor of survival. Our aim is to systematically review the literature and discuss the reported therapeutic approaches to identify the best therapeutic approach. Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CILEA Archive, BMJ Clinical Evidence, and Up ToDate databases were screened limiting the research to articles written in English from January 1992 through December 2013. This way a total of 474 manuscripts were retrieved for furthermore evaluation. Eleven manuscripts were considered eligible and the study is focused on those works. We analyzed a total of 3,893 patients and 114 cases of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage. Different treatments were grouped into three main categories: conservative approach (66 cases), endoscopic approach (21 cases), and surgical approach (27 cases). The overall mortality rate is 26.32 per cent and surgical approach showed the higher rate. According to the reported data, a complete resolution of the leakage can be achieved in an interval ranging from 7 to 28 days in the group treated conservatively. Conservative approach should always be considered as the treatment of choice. Reoperation may be necessary in case of wide dehiscence or when other treatments fail; therefore, the high mortality rate related to this procedure is due to the comorbidities of patients undergoing relaparotomy. Finally, endoscopic approach with endoclips seems promising but needs furthermore studies.

Pancreatic surgery remains the only established curative treatment for pancreatic cancer. Radical antegrade pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is a modification of the standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS) developed to achieve a complete N1 node resection and R0 resection (posterior extent). The aim of this study is to compare the short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes of RAMPS and SRPS. From a database that included 143 consecutive patients who underwent resection for pancreatic carcinoma at the St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome, 25 patients who underwent pancreatosplenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Among these 25 patients, eight (32%) underwent RAMPS (Group 1) and 17 (68%) underwent SRPS (Group 2). Clinicopathologic and oncological characteristics of the RAMPS group were compared with those of the SRPS group. RAMPS was longer than SRPS (315 vs 265 minutes, respectively, P < 0.001). No differences were encountered for perioperative outcomes (estimated blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusions, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and hospital stay). The margin status rates were similar: noteworthy, the two patients with positive tangential margins belonged to Group 2. No between-group differences in survival were encountered: the actuarial 5-year overall survival for Groups 1 and 2 were 26 and 29 per cent, respectively (P = 0.6608; hazard ratio, 1.2621; 95% confidence interval, 0.4462 to 3.5699). RAMPS and SRPS did not differ statistically in terms of perioperative outcomes. RAMPS seems to allow better control of tangential margins; however, no difference was found in actuarial survival compared with standard pancreatosplenectomy.

Nodal ratio (NR) has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of nodal ratio comparing it with the new TNM (2010) classification. One hundred forty-two patients were submitted to potentially curative gastrectomy for cancer. Patients with low performance status underwent D1.5 lymphadenectomy, whereas the other patients underwent D2-D2.5 lymphadenectomy. Nodal staging was classified according to 2010 International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival, stratified for nodal classes and nodal status. Total gastrectomy was performed in 39 per cent of cases and distal gastrectomy in 61 per cent. Mean number of resected nodes was 25.5. Whereas N status was strictly related to the number of resected nodes, the NR was independent from the extension of the lymphadenectomy. Overall five-year survival was 81 per cent for N0 patients, 72 per cent for N1, and 26 and 23 per cent for N2 and N3, respectively. Patients with NR0 had 81 per cent five-year survival, whereas NR1 67 per cent, NR2 51 per cent, and NR3 22 per cent. NR seems to be a simple method to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer; unlike N status, it is independent from the number of resected nodes, and therefore it is particularly useful in case of inadequate lymphadenectomy.

Liver resection is considered the therapeutic gold standard for primary and metastatic liver neoplasms. The reduction of postoperative complications and mortality has resulted in a more aggressive approach to hepatic malignancies. For the most part, results of liver surgery have been published by highly experienced institutions, but the observations of highly specialized units results may not reflect the current status of hepatic surgery, underestimating mortality and complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate morbidity and mortality as a result of liver resection for primary and metastatic lesions, analyzing a large number of studies with a meta-analytic process taking into account the overdispersion of data. An extensive literature search has been conducted, and 148 papers published between January 2000 and April 2008, including a total of 36,629 patients from both high-volume and low volume institutions, were included in the meta-analysis. A beta binomial model was used to provide a robust estimate of the summary event rate by pooling overdispersion binomial data from different studies. Overall morbidity and mortality after liver surgery were 29.32 per cent and 3.15 per cent, respectively. Significantly higher postoperative mortality was observed after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinomas and primary hepatic tumors. The application of a beta binomial model to correct for overdispersion of liver surgery data showed significantly higher postoperative mortality rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas or primary hepatic tumors after liver resection.

An association between hospital surgical volume and short- and long-term outcomes after pancreatic surgery has been demonstrated. Identification of specific factors contributing to this relationship is difficult. In this study, the authors evaluated if margin status can be identified as a measure of surgical quality, affecting overall survival, as a function of hospital pancreaticoduodenectomy volume. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Two models for analysis were created, dividing the 18 studies identified into quartiles and two quantiles based on the average annual hospital pancreatectomy volume. Regression modeling and analysis of variance were used to find an association between hospital volume, margin status, and survival. Increasing hospital volume was associated with a significantly increased negative margin status rate: 55 per cent for low-volume, 72 per cent for medium-volume, 74.3 per cent for high-volume, and 75.7 per cent for very high-volume centers (P = 0.008). The negative margin status rates were 64 per cent and 75.1 per cent for volume centers with less and more than 12 pancreaticoduodenectomies/year, respectively (P = 0.04). Low-volume centers negatively affected both margin positive resection and 5-year survival rates, compared with high-volume centers. Margin status rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy could, therefore, be considered a measure of quality for selection of hospitals dedicated to pancreatic surgery.

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) is both feasible and safe with either transperitoneal or retroperitoneal entry. However, only a few studies have rigorously compared these two techniques. The aim of the current study is to compare transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy to detect significant differences in patient selection and perioperative outcomes. Between 1995 and 2009, 171 patients underwent MIA through transperitoneal (n = 127) or retroperitoneal access (n = 44). The respective cohorts were then examined retrospectively through matched and unmatched comparisons. Multivariate analyses of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay were performed. Surgical indications were benign lesions (70.2%), malignant tumors (11.1%), and pheochromocytomas (18.7%). The postoperative morbidity rate was 15.8 per cent, but mortality was null. The rate of conversion to open surgery was 5.3 per cent. Blood loss and operative time were significantly lower with the transperitoneal approach, whereas time to oral intake was shorter for the retroperitoneal group. Tumor size less than 4.5 cm was associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and lower postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneal routes are both effective and safe for excising adrenal lesions. In the present study, however, laparoscopic adrenalectomy demonstrated shorter operative times with less blood loss. Regardless of this, we remain cautious in recommending one procedure preferentially. Other important measures of clinical outcome such as required pain control, ease of patient recovery, and cost considerations were not included in this analysis. Further randomized trials, with large patient numbers, are therefore desirable for defining an optimal surgical method.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most frequent complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy, results in increased morbidity and mortality, and adversely affects length of stay and costs. Reported rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula vary from 0 per cent up to more than 30 per cent. Plenty of randomized trails and meta-analysis were published to analyze the ideal procedure, technique of anastomosis, and perioperative management of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy; however, results are often discordant and clear evidence on the ideal management and surgical technique to reduce POPF rate is not yet provided. This collective review examined the current evidence about risk factors contributing to postoperative pancreatic fistula and delineates methods of diagnosis and treatment of this universally dreaded complication.

Surgery is the only effective treatment able to improve survival of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, the significance of prognostic factors on overall survival is still debated. We evaluated early and long-term outcomes of patients resected for hilar cholangiocarcinoma over a 3-year period to determine the role of prognostic factors and their effect on overall survival. Medical records of patients with hilar CCA who underwent resection between January 2001 and December 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. Thirty-two of 45 patients underwent surgical resection with curative intent. Morbidity was 24.4 per cent; perioperative mortality was 0 per cent. Overall median survival was 22.3 months. Well-differentiated tumor grading and R0 resection were independently associated with better survival at multivariate analysis. Aggressive surgery, including biliary resection combined with major hepatectomy, is a safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality in a tertiary referral hepatobiliary center. The main aim of an aggressive surgical approach is to obtain a microscopic margin-negative resection, which is associated with better prognosis. Another important prognostic factor is tumor grading, which is independently associated with survival.

Several effective treatments are available for patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Conversely, the management of patients with large or multinodular HCCs is controversial, and the role of surgical resection is not well defined. Between 2000 and 2006, 51 patients with large or multinodular HCC underwent liver resection. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted. Although 20 patients had multinodular HCCs, 31 had large solitary tumors. Perioperative mortality occurred in eight patients and complications in 15. In patients with large solitary tumors, 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 41.3 per cent and 56.1 per cent, respectively. Those with multinodular HCCs demonstrated 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates of 0 per cent and 33.6 per cent, respectively. Liver resection can result in long-term survival in select patients with large or multinodular HCCs, even in select patients with impaired liver function. Large solitary HCCs seem to have better prognoses than multinodular tumors, with lower recurrence and higher survival rates after surgery. Randomized controlled trials comparing resection to other treatment modalities are indicated to determine optimal patient management.

Gastric cancer remains one of the most common human malignancies with a poor prognosis. Apoptosis is known to be a programmed cell death and its inhibition is involved in the unregulated cellular growth that leads to neoplasms. Microvessel density (MVD) has been investigated as a promoting factor for angiogenesis with conflicting results about its relation to survival. The aim of our study was to search a correlation between these factors and some clinicopathological features and prognosis. Identification of apoptotic cells was performed applying the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling technique and recorded as apoptotic index (A.I.), whereas monoclonal antibodies were used for the study of MVD. A significant correlation was found between low and high A.I. and the subgroup of patients in Stages I and II (P < 0.02); 20 per cent of patients with a low A.I. showed an overall survival longer than 5 years versus 44 per cent of patients with an high A.I. (P = 0.041). High MVD was significantly related to the T stage (P = 0.036) and to a poorer 5-year overall survival (P < 0.05). Further studies are required to confirm the role of apoptosis and MVD in the development and progression of gastric cancer.

The tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system has become the principal method for assessing the extent of disease, determining prognosis in gastric cancer patients, and affecting the therapy strategies. The extent of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor. The aim of this study was to compare the N-classifications of the 4th and the 5th-6th TNM editions and to evaluate retrospectively the prognostic value of the 2002 TNM edition. We evaluated 344 patients who underwent curative total or subtotal gastrectomy. Nodal involvement was detected in 221 (64%) patients. Median follow-up period was 76 months. Thirty per cent of the old N1 patients were reclassified as pN2 (18.5%) and pN3 (11.3%). Eighty-eight per cent of the old N2 patients were reclassified as pN1 (75%) and pN3 (13.7%). In reclassifying the patients, statistically significant changes were reported between 1987 and 2002 TNM stage grouping, mainly in stage IIIB and IV. The 5-year survival rate per stage group did not statistically differ between the 4th and the 5th-6th editions, although a diminutive trend was registered in the IIIA stage. pTNM stage, nodal numerical stage, nodal topographical stage, and depth of tumor invasion resulted in significantly independent prognostic factors. Our data confirm the simplicity and easy application of the new stadiation and the better prognostic stratification of the N-stage. The pN3 group showed a worse prognosis independent of location. On the other hand, prognostic value of pN1 and pN2 stage is lower, probably depending on lymph node location. In multivariate analysis, the difference between old and new TNM staging is low. Hence, we suggest comparing lymph node location and number in larger series. In our series, in pT1 tumors, neither pN2 nor pN3 involvement was found. Hence, in our opinion, for correct N-staging, 10 lymph nodes in early gastric cancer and at least 16 in the other pT-stages seem sufficient for a real pN0 stadiation.

In planning treatment of a gastric neoplasm in a patient previously treated for lobular breast carcinoma, it is important to differentiate a primary gastrointestinal tract tumor from a metastatic form. We report a case of a breast lobular carcinoma metastatic to the stomach. The patient underwent a subtotal gastrectomy for symptomatic disease. Although gastric symptoms appeared 14 years after the breast carcinoma, immunohistochemical analysis of the surgical specimen helped to establish that the gastric lesion, thought to be primary, was effectively a metastatic repetition of the breast neoplasm. To better define treatment in a gastric neoplasm patient previously treated for breast carcinoma, the preoperative diagnosis should rule out a metastatic disease. The patient described received an adjuvant chemotherapy according to breast cancer protocol after gastric resection for symptomatic disease. The patient is still alive and undergoing chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinosis.

Gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) neoplasms have become more common over the past decade. Like mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes and other gastric tumors, GEJ tumors spread to the retroperitoneal nodes. The TNM staging system does not consider this pattern and does not clinically distinguish GEJ tumors from gastric and esophageal cancers. The aim of the study is to compare the old and new TNM staging systems to assess whether the new TNM classifies lymph node involvement in these tumors as a prognostic factor. From January 1983 to December 1995, 438 patients underwent curative gastric resections for cancer at the Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni" of the University of Rome "La Sapienza". Sixty-two had GEJ type II and III tumors according to the Siewert classification system. The old pN1 and new pN1 survival rates (P < 0.05) were statistically different; the old pN2 and new pN2 survival rates (P = 0.483) were not. The multivariate analysis of significant statistical prognostic factors showed that the pTNM staging in type II and type III GEJ tumors is the most important prognostic factor (P < 0.001), followed by the old pN and new pN (P < 0.001) and the pT (P < 0.005). Gender, age, Lauren type, and tumor location according to Siewert (II vs III) were not independently significant prognostic factors. This study concludes that the numbers and locations of metastatic lymph nodes are important prognostic factors that should be included in the next TNM edition.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term results of 104 consecutive laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed during a period of 10 years in two specialist centers. One hundred four patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy in two specialist centers in Italy between 1994 and 2003. Indications to laparoscopic adrenalectomy were aldosterone-secreting adenoma (20%), pheochromocytoma (24%), cortisol-secreting adenoma (11.5%), incidentaloma (26.9%), multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 2A (2.8%), adrenal metastases from lung cancer (3.8%), adrenal cyst (6.7%), and angiomyolipoma (3.8%). Transperitoneal anterior and lateral approaches were adopted in 17 and 84 patients, respectively. Retroperitoneal approach was adopted in three patients. Mean operative time was 108 +/- 39.1 minutes (range, 40-300 minutes). There was no correlation between adrenal tumor diameter and operative time. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 106 mL (range, 40-600 mL). Intraoperative complication rate and conversion rate were 4.8 per cent (5 cases). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe procedure. After a relatively short learning curve, it can be performed successfully by any surgeon with low operative morbidity and mortality. The size of the adrenal tumor should not be considered a contraindication to this procedure.

A laparoscopic procedure is considered the treatment of choice for adrenalectomy. We report the experience of a nonreferring unit for adrenal pathology; we have evaluated its safety and feasibility in a series of 40 patients. From 1994 to 2001, forty consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy, 37 with transperitoneal and 3 with retroperitoneal approach. The mean operative time was 129 +/- 51.7 minutes (range 60-300): 107 +/- 29 minutes (range 60-100) for the right-sided transperitoneal adrenalectomy and 144 +/- 62 minutes (range 90-300) for the left-sided transperitoneal adrenalectomy. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 90 mL (range 40-200). The procedure laparoscopic was converted to open in one case for the presence of a voluminous angiolipoma arising from the retroperitoneal fat strictly adherent to the adrenal gland. The postoperative morbidity rate was 5.1 per cent. Pain medication was required for a mean period of 1.6 +/- 0.6 days (range 1-3). The patients were able to resume solid food after an average time of 1.8 +/- 0.7 days (range 1-4). Postoperative hospital stay was 3 +/- 1.4 days (range 2-8). We believe that laparoscopic adrenalectomy is safe and effective in removing benign functioning or nonfunctioning adrenal masses and also in a general surgery department.