1. Combined Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Alone: A Retrospective Review of Outcomes at Our Institution.
- Author
-
Dick, Amanda M., Brothers, Thomas, Robison, Jacob G., Elliott, Bruce M., Kratz, John M., Toole, J. Matthew, Crumbley, Arthur J., and Crawford, Fred A.
- Subjects
- *
CEREBROVASCULAR disease prevention , *ACADEMIC medical centers , *CAROTID artery surgery , *COMPUTER software , *CONFIDENCE intervals , *CORONARY artery bypass , *ENDARTERECTOMY , *EPIDEMIOLOGY , *MULTIVARIATE analysis , *HEALTH outcome assessment , *VETERANS' hospitals , *LOGISTIC regression analysis , *DATA analysis , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *RETROSPECTIVE studies - Abstract
Background: It remains controversial whether patients with concomitant carotid and coronary disease should undergo operative repair separately or in combination. Methods: Patients with documented cerebrovascular disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone were matched by propensity scoring with patients undergoing combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA)/CABG procedures and compared for the occurrence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality. Results: Of the 4943 patients undergoing CABG, 908 had known cerebrovascular disease. Among these, 134 underwent concomitant CEA, and these were propensity matched with 134 patients undergoing CABG only. No differences were observed in the perioperative risks of stroke (4% vs 3%, odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-5.5), MI (0.7% vs 0.7%, not significant [NS]), or combined cardiovascular events (6% vs 10%, OR 0.5, 95% CI [0.2-1.3]), although mortality (1% vs 8%, OR 0.2, 95% CI [0.04-0.8] was higher with CABG only. Discussion: Addition of CEA to CABG did not significantly alter the risk of perioperative stroke relative to propensity-matched patients undergoing CABG alone. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF