Search

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to death and hardship around the world, and increased popular discourse about end-of-life circumstances and conditions. The extent to which this discourse and related pandemic experiences have precipitated advance care planning (ACP) activities was the focus of this study with a particular emphasis on sexual orientation. Methods: A large, national online survey was conducted between 10 August and 10 October 2020 in Canada. The final sample of 3923 persons aged 55 and older was recruited using social media, direct email, and Facebook advertising and in conjunction with community groups. Women comprised almost 78% of the sample; just more than 7% of the sample identified as lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB). Measures included demographic variables and a series of questions on ACP, including documents and discussions undertaken prior to the pandemic and since its onset. Results: Descriptive analyses revealed few gender or sexual orientation differences on documents and discussions prior to the pandemic; since its onset, LGB persons have completed or initiated wills, powers of attorney, advance directives, representation agreements, and have engaged in ACP discussions in greater proportion than heterosexuals. Logistic regressions reveal the increased likelihood of pre-pandemic ACP engagement by age, gender (women), and education; since the pandemic onset, gender, education, and sexual orientation were predictive of greater ACP engagement. Care discussions were more likely undertaken by women and LGB persons since the pandemic most often with spouses, family, and friends, especially among LGB persons. Discussion: Gender roles and previous pandemic experiences (HIV/AIDS, in particular) are implicated in this pattern of results; opportunities for educational interventions are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advance directives (ADs) have traditionally been viewed as clear instructions for implementing patient wishes at times of compromised decision-making capacity (DMC). However, whether individuals prefer ADs to be strictly followed or to serve as general guidelines has not been studied. The Veterans Administration's Advance Directive Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care and Living Will (VA AD) provides patients the opportunity to indicate specific treatment preferences and to indicate how strictly the directive is to be followed. Objective: To describe preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) in various illness conditions as well as instructions for the use of VA ADs. Design/Setting: A descriptive study was performed collecting data from all ADs entered into the medical record at 1 VA Medical Center between January and June 2014. Measurements: Responses to VA AD with emphasis on health care agents (HCAs) and LW responses. Results: Veterans were more likely to reject LST when death was imminent (74.6%), when in a coma (71.1%), if they had brain damage (70.6%), or were ventilator dependent (70.4%). A majority (67.4%) of veterans preferred the document to be followed generally rather than strictly. Veterans were more likely to want VA ADs to serve as a general guide when a spouse was named HCA. Conclusion: Most of the sampled veterans rejected LST except under conditions of permanent disability. A majority intend VA ADs to serve as general guidelines rather than strict, binding instructions. These findings have significant implications for surrogate decision making and the use of ADs more generally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advance directives provide health-care instruction for incapacitated individuals and authorize who may make health-care decisions for that individual. Identified factors do not explain all variance related to advance directive completion. This study was an analysis of an association between advance directive completion and death attitudes. Surveys that included the Death Attitude Profile--Revised were completed anonymously. Comparisons of means, chi-square, and logistic regression tests were conducted. Among individuals who did not consider themselves religious, the mean death avoidance attitude scores differed significantly among those with advance directives (mean=1.93) and those without (mean=4.05) as did the mean approach acceptance attitude scores of those with advance directives (mean=5.73) and those without (mean=3.71). Among individuals who do consider themselves religious, the mean escape acceptance attitude scores differed significantly among those with advance directives (mean=5.11) and those without (mean=4.15). The complicated relationships among religiosity, advance directives, and death attitudes warrant further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study of racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning (ACP) and whether Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians differ in rates of ACP. Latinos are less likely than Whites to discuss preferences and have a living will, but the gap is fully accounted for by education. Asians are less likely than Whites to have discussions, but more likely to have living wills, Black-White differences emerge only among people of low socioeconomic status.

The article looks at the effects of parental death on the relationships of adult siblings. The authors consider how relationship quality may vary on the basis of the presence and perceived effectiveness of a dead parent's formal preparations for palliative care. Results indicate that parental death is associated with a decrease in sibling closeness. The parent's use of advance directives such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care are discussed.