Search

Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is an important cause of throat discomfort in the elderly. Our objective was to investigate the usefulness of barium swallow studies for the diagnosis of LPRD. Methods: The subjects were 59 patients at least 60 years of age with LPRD suspected on laryngoscopic findings. We evaluated esophageal clearance using a barium swallow study and the upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic findings of gastroesophageal reflux disease according to the revised Los Angeles classification, and correlated these findings with the effect of rabeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor. Results: Among subjects with positive reflux findings in the esophageal phase of the barium swallow, rabeprazole was significantly effective (p = 0.0025). To identify nonerosive reflux disease, we analyzed the 50 cases with a negative Los Angeles classification of upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic findings. Rabeprazole was again significantly effective in patients with positive findings for esophageal reflux (p = 0.0025). Conclusions: Among elderly patients with suspected LPRD, there was a positive correlation between impaired esophageal clearance on the barium swallow study and the effectiveness of rabeprazole. The barium swallow study could be a screening test for LPRD in elderly patients with throat discomfort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the necessity of morphological images (MI) in reading somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in patients with suspected neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors.Material and Methods: A Japanese multicenter clinical trial of SRS was conducted in 40 patients with suspected GEP tumors. Three experienced radiologists interpreted the images in three separate sessions in a blinded manner (1: SRS images alone, 2: MI alone, 3: SRS and MI analyzed simultaneously), and the reading results of each session were compared. In addition, the diagnostic abilities of SRS, MI and SRS alone and simultaneous SRS and MI readings were compared for patients where final diagnosis was obtained.Results: SRS detected more suspected lesions (positive or inconclusive uptake) than morphological images did (51 vs 27 lesions), but included many physiological uptakes detected as positive or inconclusive uptakes. Combined reading of SRS and morphological images helped to correctly recognize these physiological uptakes, and also helped in determining the anatomical localization of the abnormal uptakes. Combined reading of SRS and morphological images gave the highest diagnostic impact.Conclusion: The sensitivity of SRS with regard to GEP is high. However the specificity is very low. Morphologic imaging is necessary for the exclusion of physiological uptake and correct anatomic location of an abnormal tracer uptake. The combined reading of SRS and morphologic imaging studies gives the highest diagnostic impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]