1. Are current rates of uncemented fixation in total hip arthroplasty supported by the literature? An update on the uncemented paradox.
- Author
-
Scanlon, Christopher M, Gemayel, Anthony C, Buehring, Weston, Slover, James D, and Malchau, Henrik
- Subjects
- *
TOTAL hip replacement , *HIP fractures , *COMPLICATIONS of prosthesis , *FRACTURE fixation , *DECISION making in clinical medicine , *BONE cements , *ARTIFICIAL joints , *SURGICAL instruments , *PROSTHESIS design & construction - Abstract
The optimal fixation method in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. Initial concerns related to the long-term performance of cement fixation as well as cement disease led to the development of cementless implants, and registry data has indicated that the use of this type of fixation has increased in recent years. However, data from these same registries has not shown any improvement in outcomes when compared to cement fixation. On the contrary, while similar outcomes are seen when comparing these fixation types in younger patients (<70 years of age), cementless fixation has shown increased implant failure and revision rates in elderly patients (>70 years of age). Given the increased projected volume of THA in the United States over the next decade, it is important to utilise available data to make clinical decisions that minimise not only individual patient harm, but also the burden on the healthcare system itself. This review provides an overview of currently available outcomes data comparing cement and cementless fixation, as well as an updated analysis of current trends in fixation use in THA. We furthermore provide a comprehensive technique guide to help surgeons optimise cement fixation of the femoral component for THA and hemiarthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF