Search

Objectives: Clinical evidence regarding radiological–endoscopic management of intrahepatic bile duct stones is currently lacking. Our aim is to report our 18-year experience in combined radiological–endoscopic management of intrahepatic difficult bile duct stones. Methods: From June 1994 to June 2012, 299 symptomatic patients with difficult bile duct stones were admitted to our institution. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC)/biliary drainage/s was performed, dilating the PTC track to 10 or 16 French within 3–7 days. Afterward we carried out percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and/or interventional radiology techniques. Follow up was made with clinical/laboratory tests and ultrasound (US). We retrospectively analyzed our radiological–endoscopic approach and reported our technical and clinical outcomes. Results: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 298 patients after a maximum of 4 consecutive sessions. Most patients (64.6%) were treated with PTCS/EHL alone, while the remaining with radiological techniques alone (26%) or a combination of both techniques (13.3%). Recurrence of stones occurred in 45 cases (15%, Tsunoda class III and class IV) within 2 years and were successfully retreated. Major adverse events were: 5 (1.6%) cases of massive bleeding that required embolisation, 2 (0.66%) perforations of the common bile duct and 31 cases (10.3%) of acute cholangitis managed with medical therapy or intervention. Conclusion: After 18 years of experience we demonstrated that our combined radiological–endoscopic approach to ‘difficult bile duct stones‘ may result in both immediate and long-term clearance of stones with a low rate of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We evaluated the efficacy of endoscopic techniques employed in the management of cervical esophageal and hypopharyngeal strictures. Methods: A series of 45 patients with cervical esophageal (35) and/or hypopharyngeal strictures (10) were included. Twenty-five patients (55.6%) with neoplastic strictures were treated for palliation alone. The stenosis was related to radiotherapy in 11 patients (24.4%) and to postsurgical complications in 9 (20%). A group of 23 patients was treated with dilation alone (group 1). A second group included 22 patients treated with insertion of a self-expandable stent after failure of dilation treatment (group 2). The swallowing test data, clinical notes, and surgical reports were reviewed. Results: All of the patients showed some degree of relief of dysphagia. In group 1, 19 of the 23 patients required multiple dilation treatments to maintain normal deglutition. In group 2, 7 of the 22 patients recovered regular oral feeding after stent placement. 10 patients reported pain and foreign body sensation, 2 patients reported pain so severe that stent removal was required, and 3 patients experienced stent migration. All but 3 of the 25 patients with inoperable tumors died during follow-up, but no patients with benign stenosis died. Conclusions: The two groups showed comparable functional results. Dilation often requires multiple procedures, but is usually well tolerated. Placement of self-expandable stents is effective, but is generally less well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because retrorectal-presacral tumors differ in histologic origin, symptoms, and prognosis, and often involve various neighboring structures, successful treatment of this heterogeneous group of tumors depends on the surgical approach chosen and the specialist surgeons involved. We investigated whether a new classification of retrorectal tumors based on findings from CT and MRI would simplify presurgical planning. The clinical records of a series of 34 patients who underwent surgery for retrorectal tumors from 1989 to 2003 were reviewed. Two radiologists, who were blind to the patients' records, separately reviewed the preoperative CT and MRI findings and classified tumors according to whether they arose from the presacral area (Group 1), sacrum or spinal cord growing anteriorly (Group 2), or rectum growing posteriorly (Group 3). The preoperative CT and MRI findings for the retrorectal tumors yielded the information required to allow surgery to be properly planned (surgical approach and need to involve various specialist surgeons) in nearly all cases: 17 of the 18 patients (94.5%) with tumors arising from the retrorectal space, all 12 of those with tumors arising from the sacrum or spinal cord, and all four of those with rectal tumors. With the findings yielded by currently available CT and MRI techniques, retrorectal tumors can be anatomically and topographically classified preoperatively so as to allow surgery to be adequately planned in advance and thus optimize the surgical resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]