Search

Study Design: Multicenter retrospective study. Objectives: To investigate adverse events (AEs) in patients with neuropathic pain related to lumbar disease who switched to mirogabalin from pregabalin. Methods: This study surveyed the records of 82 patients with peripheral neuropathic leg pain related to lumbar disease who switched to mirogabalin from pregabalin. We evaluated AEs associated with pregabalin and mirogabalin, the continuation rate of mirogabalin, and the pain-relieving effect at 4 weeks after switching from pregabalin to mirogabalin. We compared patients who switched due to lack of efficacy (LoE group) and patients who switched due to AEs (AE group). Results: The incidence rates of somnolence and dizziness with pregabalin were 12.2% and 14.6%, respectively, while the incidence rates with mirogabalin were reduced to 7.3% for somnolence and 4.9% for dizziness. The incidence of AEs with pregabalin was significantly higher in the AE group (LoE group: 11.1%, AE group 100%), especially for somnolence (LoE group: 3.2%, AE group: 47.1%) and dizziness (LoE group: 4.8%, AE: 52.9%). After switching, the incidences of AEs with mirogabalin were not significantly different between the 2 groups (LoE group: 15.9%, AE group: 23.5%), including for somnolence (LoE group: 7.9%, AE group: 5.9%) and dizziness (LoE group: 4.8%, AE group: 5.9%). There were no significant differences in continuation rate of mirogabalin or the pain-relieving effect between groups. Conclusions: The patients who experience somnolence and dizziness with pregabalin might be able to continue safely receiving treatment for their pain by switching to mirogabalin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem that adversely affects the quality of life (QOL) of workers. The etiology of LBP is considered to be multi-factorial with individual, physical, and psychosocial factors contributing to its development and persistence. Although prevention of LBP in workers in the workplace is very important, only a small number of studies have assessed the risk factors and epidemiology of LBP among Japanese factory workers who stand as part of their job. This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of LBP in 691 factory employees who conducted their work while standing. Health-related QOL was evaluated using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) to quantify the severity of LBP with the aim of identifying risk factors for LBP among workers who stand as part of their work in an electronics manufacturing company. We observed that the prevalence of LBP lasting for at least 48 hours within a week was 20.0% among participants, with female employees and those with a prior history of LBP having a significantly increased risk of developing LBP. The distribution of the RDQ score showed a negative regression curve among the employees, which was different from the normal distribution pattern reported previously in Japanese patients with LBP. These findings suggest that prolonged standing among factory workers poses an increased risk for LBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients presenting with hip diseases often have coexisting spine disorders, a condition that is termed "hip-spine syndrome." However, few reports have evaluated total spinal alignments in patients with coxalgia. In this study, we retrospectively examined the relationship between several clinical and x-ray parameters of the hip joints and spinal alignment in patients with coxalgia. Methods: 100 patients with coxalgia (24 men, 76 women; average age, 60.0 years; age range, 16–88 years) were included. We retrospectively evaluated the following clinical and x-ray findings of hip joints and total spinal alignment: range of motion (ROM) and pain score components of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Score; leg length discrepancy (LLD); osteoarthritis (OA) stage of the hip; spinal coronal balance (Cobb angle and C7-central sacral ventral line [CSVL]); and spinal sagittal balance (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence [PI]). Results: Significant positive correlations were detected between C7 - CSVL and LLD (r = 0.35), whereas a significant negative correlation was found between SVA and hip ROM score (r = −0.37). A significant positive correlation was also detected between SVA and OA stage of the hip (r = 0.35). Conclusion: In the present study, large leg length discrepancy and hip pain may contribute to spinal coronal misalignment. In addition, advanced stage of OA and decreasing ROM of the hip may lead to increased spinal sagittal misalignment. These findings suggest that when evaluating spinal alignment, the progression of OA, LLD, and pain and ROM of the hip joint should be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]