Search

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) and computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3D) measures. Methods: One hundred and sixteen consecutive primary THAs were analysed. The preoperative diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in all cases. The 2D templating and the 3D templating were performed by two different residents. All templating results were available for the orthopaedic surgeon performing the procedure. Accuracies with regard to the predicted and actual implant sizes were determined for each procedure. Implantation of the size as planned was defined as "exact", whereas the use of components within one size larger or smaller (±1) as planned were defined as "accurate." Results: The 3D templating was significantly more accurate in predicting implant sizing compared to 2D templating for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The difference was statistically significant for the cup templating ("exact" p = 0.02; "accurate" p = 0.01) and for the stem templating ("exact" p = 0.04; "accurate" p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our results support the superiority of 3D templating over 2D templating in predicting implant size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The metacarpophalangeal joints exhibit range of motion that is influenced by wrist position. Synergistic motion occurs between the wrist and the metacarpophalangeal joints with different static wrist positions affecting joints' motion capability. The aim of this study was to determine how different wrist positions influence the active range of motion of the index through small finger metacarpophalangeal joints. Methods: The active range of motion of the index through small finger metacarpophalangeal joints of 31 healthy subjects was measured in flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation in 5 different flexion/extension wrist positions, using biaxial electrogoniometers. Results: There was a difference in range of motion of all fingers depending on the wrist position. The minimum metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion was found in 80° wrist extension, the maximum in neutral wrist position. For the index finger, flexion/extension was 84.7° (±8.6°) to 25.9° (±10.2°) and radial/ulnar deviation was 32.1° (±11.3°) to 22.6° (±12.8°). For the middle finger, flexion/extension was 84.8° (±8.5°) to 25.9° (±10.1°) and radial/ulnar deviation 28.8° (±11.1°) to 22.1° (±8.9). The fourth finger showed a range of motion for flexion/extension of 87.2° (±11.5°) to 22.8° (±11.6°) and radial/ulnar deviation of 8.1° (±5.8°) to 32.3° (±12.4°). The highest range of motion was measured at the fifth finger with flexion/extension of 84.0° (±8.6°) to 32.1°(±16.8°) and radial/ulnar deviation of 15.1° (±12.9°) up to 54.6° (±18.7°). Conclusions: The range of motion of the index through small finger metacarpophalangeal joints was significantly influenced by wrist position. The highest metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion of all fingers was conducted in neutral wrist positions. Apart from ergonomic implications, we conclude that metacarpophalangeal joint motion should be assessed under standardized wrist positions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]