Search

Through the development and field testing of an instrument designed to measure youth social capital in the context of postsecondary transitions, this research addresses the need for theory-driven measures of social capital among youth. The results offer preliminary evidence that dimensions of youth social capital, including network structure and network content, can be reliably measured and that these dimensions of social capital are interrelated in a manner consistent with theory. The results also offer initial support for the validity of the social capital construct within the domain of youth postsecondary transitions. Taken together, the findings provide a foundation for continued research that might surmount inadequate measures and theoretical disputes to encompass more careful and rigorous empirical scrutiny when it comes to the measurement of social capital among children and adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The hierarchical network model (HNM) is a framework introduced by Sweet, Thomas, and Junker for modeling interventions and other covariate effects on ensembles of social networks, such as what would be found in randomized controlled trials in education research. In this article, we develop calculations for the power to detect an intervention effect using the hierarchical latent space model, an important subfamily of HNMs. We derive basic convergence results and asymptotic bounds on power, showing that standard error for the treatment effect is inversely proportional to the product of the number of ties and the number of networks; a result rather different from the usual effect of cluster size in hierarchical linear models, for example. We explore these results with a simulation study and suggest a tentative approach to power for practical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intervention studies in school systems are sometimes aimed not at changing curriculum or classroom technique, but rather at changing the way that teachers, teaching coaches, and administrators in schools work with one another—in short, changing the professional social networks of educators. Current methods of social network analysis are ill-suited to modeling the multiple partially exchangeable networks that arise in randomized field trials and observational studies in which multiple classrooms, schools, or districts are involved, and to detecting the effect of an intervention on the social network itself. To address these needs, we introduce a new modeling framework, the Hierarchical Network Models (HNM) framework. The HNM framework can be used to extend single-network statistical network models to multiple networks, using a hierarchical modeling approach. We show how to generalize the latent space model for a single network to the HNM/multiple-network setting, and illustrate our approach with real and simulated social network data among education professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduces two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation procedures for the Bayesian estimation of unfolding model parameters. Direct implementation of MCMC; Use of the estimation procedure to analyze three data sets and two from real attitudinal surveys; Analysis of the unfolding model as a latent response model.

Open-ended or “constructed” student responses to test items have become a stock component of standardized educational assessments. Digital imaging of examinee work now enables a distributed rating process to be flexibly managed, and allocation designs that involve as many as six or more ratings for a subset of responses are now feasible. In this article we develop Patz’s (1996) hierarchical rater model (HRM) for polytomous item response data scored by multiple raters, and show how it can be used to scale examinees and items, to model aspects of consensus among raters, and to model individual rater severity and consistency effects. The HRM treats examinee responses to open-ended items as unobsered discrete varibles, and it explicitly models the “proficiency” of raters in assigning accurate scores as well as the proficiency of examinees in providing correct responses. We show how the HRM “fits in” to the generalizability theory framework that has been the traditional tool of analysis for rated item response data, and give some relationships between the HRM, the design effects correction of Bock, Brennan and Muraki (1999), and the rater bundle model of Wilson and Hoskens (2002). Using simulated and real data, we compare the HRM to the conventional IRT Facets model for rating data (e.g., Linacre, 1989; Engelhard, 1994, 1996), and we explore ways that information from HRM analyses may improved the quality of the rating process. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Presents a study which discussed the usability and interpretability issues for single-strategy cognitive assessment models. Discussion on the extensions of item response theory (IRT) models for cognitive assessment; Assessments of transitive reasoning in children; Description of two IRT-like cognitive assessment models.

Presents information on nonparametric item response theory (NIRT). Basic assumptions of NIRT; Exploratory data analysis and item and test features; Model-data fit and the explanation of data structure.

Presents information on a study which focused on the monotonocity theory that is essential to applications of nonparametric item response models. Background on the study; Discussion on elementary symmetric functions; Methods of evaluating monotonicity; Implications for exploratory analysis of dichotomous and polytomous item response data.

Patz and Junker (1999) describe a general Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) strategy, based on Metropolis-Hastings sampling, for Bayesian inference in complex item response theory (IRT) settings. They demonstrate the basic methodology using the two-parameter logistic (2PL) model. In this paper we extend their basic MCMC methodology to address issues such as non-response, designed missingness, multiple raters, guessing behavior and partial credit (polytomous) test items. We apply the basic MCMC methodology to two examples from the National Assessment of Educational Progress 1992 Trial State Assessment in Reading: (a) a multiple item format (2PL, 3PL, and generalized partial credit) subtest with missing response data; and (b) a sequence of rated, dichotomous short-response items, using a new IRT model called the generalized linear logistic test model (GLLTM). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper demonstrates Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques that are particularly well-suited to complex models with item response theory (IRT) assumptions. MCMC may be thought of as a successor to the standard practice of first calibrating the items using E-M methods and then taking the item parameters to be known and fixed at their calibrated values when proceeding with inference regarding the latent trait, in contrast to this two-stage E-M approach, MCMC methods treat item and subject parameters at the same time; this allows us to incorporate standard errors of item estimates into trait inferences, and vice versa. We develop a MCMC methodology, based on Metropolis-Hastings sampling, that can be routinely implemented to fit novel IRT models, and we compare the algorithmic features of the Metropolis- Hastings approach to other approaches based on Gibbs sampling. For concreteness we illustrate the methodology using the familiar two-parameter logistic (2PL) IRT model; more complex models are treated in a subsequent paper (Patz & Junker, in press). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]