Search

Background: Uptake of advance care planning in routine nursing home care is low. Through extensive literature review, theoretical development, and stakeholder involvement, we developed the ACP+ intervention. Aims: To evaluate the effects of ACP+ on the knowledge and self-efficacy (confidence in own skills) of nursing home care staff concerning advance care planning. Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial, conducted between February 2018 and January 2019 (NCT03521206, clinicaltrials.gov). ACP+ is a multicomponent intervention aimed at training and supporting nursing home staff and management in implementing advance care planning in nursing home practice through a train-the-trainer approach over 8 months. Fourteen nursing homes were randomized using a matched-pairing strategy, seven received ACP+, seven followed usual practice. Analyses (intention-to-treat) involved linear mixed models. Setting/participants: Nursing homes in Flanders (Belgium). Results: 694 of 1017 care staff (68% response rate) at baseline and 491 of 989 care staff (50%) post-intervention (8 months) returned questionnaires. Post-intervention, care staff's self-efficacy concerning advance care planning was significantly higher in the intervention than in the control group (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.57; 95% CI 0.20–0.94; p = 0.003; Cohen's d = 0.30). Advance care planning knowledge (95% CI 0.95–1.15; p = 0.339; ratio: 1.04) did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The ACP+ intervention for nursing homes improved care staff's self-efficacy but not their knowledge concerning advance care planning. Considering the comprehensive and multi-component approach used, these effects were smaller than expected. Reasons for this may be related to the chosen follow-up period, outcomes and measurements, or to the intervention itself and its implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A team-based approach has been advocated for advance care planning in nursing homes. While nurses are often put forward to take the lead, it is not clear to what extent other professions could be involved as well. Objectives: To examine to what extent engagement in advance care planning practices (e.g. conversations, advance directives), knowledge and self-efficacy differ between nurses, care assistants and allied care staff in nursing homes. Design: Survey study. Participants/setting: The study involved a purposive sample of 14 nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium. Nurses, care assistants and allied care staff (e.g. social workers, physical therapists) completed a survey. Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the University Hospital of Brussels (B.U.N. 143201834759), as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03521206). Results: One hundred ninety-six nurses, 319 care assistants and 169 allied staff participated (67% response rate). After adjusting for confounders, nurses were significantly more likely than care assistants to have carried out advance care planning conversations (odds ratio 4; 95% confidence interval 1.73–9.82; p < 0.001) and documented advance care planning (odds ratio 2.67; 95% confidence interval 1.29–5.56; p < 0.001); differences not found between allied staff and care assistants. Advance care planning knowledge total scores differed significantly, with nurses (estimated mean difference 0.13 (score range 0–1); 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.17; p < 0.001) and allied staff (estimated mean difference 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.12; p < 0.001) scoring higher than care assistants. We found no significant differences regarding self-efficacy. Discussion: While nursing home nurses conducted more advance care planning conversations and documentation than allied care staff and care assistants, these two professional groups may be a valuable support to nurses in conducting advance care planning, if provided with additional training. Conclusions: Allied care staff and care assistants, if trained appropriately, can be involved more strongly in advance care planning to enhance relational and individual autonomy of nursing home residents, alongside nurses. Future research to improve and implement advance care planning should consider this finding at the intervention development stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Considering social cognitive theory and current literature about successful advance care planning in nursing homes, sufficient knowledge and self-efficacy are important preconditions for staff to be able to carry out advance care planning in practice. Aim: Exploring to what extent nurses' knowledge about and self-efficacy is associated with their engagement in advance care planning in nursing homes. Design: Survey study as part of a baseline measurement of a randomised controlled cluster trial (NCT03521206). Setting/participants: Nurses in a purposive sample of 14 nursing homes in Belgium. Methods: A survey was distributed among nurses, evaluating knowledge (11 true/false items), self-efficacy (12 roles and tasks on 10-point Likert-type scale) and six advance care planning practices (yes/no), ranging from performing advance care planning conversations to completing advance directives. Results: A total of 196 nurses participated (66% response rate). While knowledge was not significantly associated with advance care planning practices, self-efficacy was. One unit's increase in self-efficacy was statistically associated with an estimated 32% increase in the number of practices having carried out. Conclusions: Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices is mainly associated with their self-efficacy rather than their knowledge. Further research is necessary to improve the evidence regarding the causal relationship between constructs. However, these results suggest that educational programmes that focus solely on knowledge might not lead to increasing uptake of advance care planning in nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Knowing the barriers/enablers to deprescribing in people with a life-limiting disease is crucial for the development of successful deprescribing interventions. These barriers/enablers have been studied, but the available evidence has not been summarized in a systematic review. Aim: To identify the barriers/enablers to deprescribing of medications in people with a life-limiting disease. Design: Systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017073693). Data sources: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL was conducted and extended with a hand search. Peer-reviewed, primary studies reporting on barriers/enablers to deprescribing in the context of explicit life-limiting disease were included in this review. Results: A total of 1026 references were checked. Five studies met the criteria and were included in this review. Three types of barriers/enablers were found: organizational, professional and patient (family)-related barriers/enablers. The most prominent enablers were organizational support (e.g. for standardized medication review), involvement of multidisciplinary teams in medication review and the perception of the importance of coming to a joint decision regarding deprescribing, which highlighted the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and involving the patient and his family in the decision-making process. The most important barriers were shortages in staff and the perceived difficulty or resistance of the nursing home resident's family – or the resident himself. Conclusion and implications of key findings: The scarcity of findings in the literature highlights the importance of filling this gap. Further research should focus on deepening the knowledge on these barriers/enablers in order to develop sustainable multifaceted deprescribing interventions in palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Information on medication use in the last months of life is limited. Aim: To describe which medications are prescribed and deprescribed in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care in relation to time before death and to explore associations with demographic variables. Design: Prospective study, using case report forms for monthly data collection. Medication included cancer treatment and 19 therapeutic groups, grouped into four categories for: (1) cancer therapy, (2) specific cancer-related symptom relief, (3) other symptom relief and (4) long-term prevention. Data were analysed retrospectively using death as the index date. We compared medication use at 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 month(s) before death by constructing five cross-sectional subsamples with medication use during that month. Paired analyses were done on a subsample of patients with at least two assessments before death. Setting/participants: We studied the medication use of 720 patients (mean age 67, 56% male) in 30 cancer centres representing 12 countries. Results: From 5 to 1 month(s) before death, cancer therapy decreased (55%-24%), most medications for symptom relief increased, for example, opioids (62%-81%) and sedatives (35%-46%), but medication for long-term prevention decreased (38%-27%). The prevalence of chemotherapy was 15.5% in the last month of life, with 9% of new courses started in the last 2 months. With higher age, chemotherapy and opioid use decreased. Conclusion: Medications for symptom relief increased in almost all medication groups. Deprescribing was found in heart medication/ anti-hypertensives and cancer therapy, although use of the latter remained relatively high. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article cites a study which evaluates face validity, feasibility, discriminative power and usefulness of palliative care services in Belgium. The study combined a quantitative analysis evaluating the answers with qualitative interviews with the contact persons of all participating services. It also discussed quality indicators for palliative care services.

The article cites a study which attempts to describe how often family carers of nursing home residents who died with dementia are aware that their relative has dementia. It examines resident, family carer, and care characteristics associated with awareness. It is concluded that family carers are often unaware that their relative has dementia.

The article presents information on a study to examine the proportion of nursing home residents with dementia who were admitted to hospital in the last month of life. The study found that 19.5% of nursing home residents in last stage of their with dementia were admitted to hospital and 4.6% of the patients were admitted to intensive care unit.

The article discusses a study which compares the physician-reported practices of general practitioners and medical specialists on continuous deep sedation until death. The study used a retrospective survey among physicians in Flanders, Belgium in 2007 to measure sedation's characteristics and symptom prevalence. Results show that the continuous deep sedation until death's frequency among all deaths was 11.3%.

The article focuses on the White Paper of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It mentions White Paper ignoring the extensive experience and substantial body of relevant empirical evidence in jurisdictions that have legalized euthanasia. It states the Canadian palliative care community reflecting on ways of reconciling traditional palliative care values.