Search

Background: In this retrospective study, 28 years of surgical treatment of children and young adults with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) was analyzed., Methods: Forty-three patients were operated on before the age of 26 years. Endoscopic aspects, operative data, and complications were analyzed, and the resection specimens were reevaluated. Functional outcome was assessed by telephone questionnaire., Results: Primary ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) was performed in 34 patients with a mean age of 16 years (range, 7-25 years). Primary ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) was performed in 9 patients at a mean age of 19 years (range, 15-24 years). Secondary excision of the rectum was performed in 7 patients. Overall, rectal carcinoma was present in 4 patients, at the age of 35, 36, 37, and 38 years. Two patients, aged 39 and 40 years, died because of invasive carcinoma with distant metastasis. The functional outcome and postoperative complications after both procedures were similar to those described in literature for children with FAP. Most patients did not experience alterations in lifestyle, and there was no urinary incontinence., Conclusions: In this retrospective study, both IRA and IPAA showed to be feasible techniques in young patients with FAP. A prospective study with a sufficient follow-up is needed to compare both techniques in this specific group of patients.

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux is a frequent problem after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of esophagitis and Barrett esophagus more than 10 years after repair of EA., Methods: Ninety-two patients treated between 1973 and 1985 were included in this prospective study. A questionnaire was completed by 86 patients; esophagogastroscopy was performed in 49 patients., Results: Only 36 patients had no complaints at all. Thirty-one patients complained of difficulties swallowing solid food; 23 complained of heartburn. Esophagogastroscopy revealed grade 3 esophagitis in 2 patients and a macroscopic image of Barrett esophagus in 2. Histology showed esophagitis in 30 patients, gastric metaplasia in 3, and no intestinal metaplasia (Barrett esophagus)., Conclusions: For epidemiologic reasons, that is, the short interval of follow-up (10 years) and the low compliance of the study group, larger numbers are needed to decide if routine long-term endoscopic screening after repair of EA is necessary. For now, it cannot yet be recommended. The prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in this study group is higher than that in the general population, but we found no severe complications of gastroesophageal reflux in the pediatric age group.