Search

Background: Direct aspiration during endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is safe and effective. The 'Soft torqueable catheter Optimized For Intracranial Access' (Sofia) catheter is commonly used. Data on differences between 5Fr and 6Fr Sofia is limited. Hence, we aimed to compare the clinical, technical, and safety outcomes between both Sofia catheters in AIS patients., Methods: Patients with an intracranial anterior circulation occlusion from the 'Maastricht Stroke Quality-registry' (MaSQ-registry), who underwent EVT for AIS from September 2020 to February 2023, and treated with the Sofia catheter in the first-line technique were included. Outcomes included a shift on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2), first-attempt recanalization rate, and per procedural complications. Multivariable regression analyses were performed with adjustments., Results: Out of 511 registered patients in the MaSQ-registry, 366 patients were included. 281 patients (77 %) were treated with the Sofia 6Fr. No shift towards better outcomes on the ordinal mRS score at 90 days was observed in the Sofia 6Fr group compared to the 5Fr (adjusted common[ac] OR:1.34, 95 %CI:0.70-2.56). Favorable functional outcome (aOR:1.24, 95 %CI:0.49-3.13), and per procedural complications (aOR:1.04, 95 %CI:0.41-2.64) did not differ significantly between Sofia 6Fr and 5Fr. The Sofia 6Fr achieved higher first-attempt successful recanalization rates (53 % versus 34 %; aOR:2.28, 95 %CI:1.11-4.69), and lower total thrombectomy attempts (median:1 versus 2; aβ:-0.63, 95 %CI:-1.21 to -0.05)., Conclusions: The use of 6Fr Sofia aspiration catheter leads in this single-center registry to higher first-attempt successful recanalization rates and fewer thrombectomy attempts compared to the 5Fr Sofia catheter. However, this did not reflect in better clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest WHvZ reports speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, and Nicolab, and consulting fees from Philips (all paid to institution); participated in the advisory boards of WeTrust (Philips) and ANAIS (Anaconda) (all paid to institution); and participated in the advisory boards of InEcxtremis (CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France) and DISTAL (University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland), studies for which no payments were received. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Pre- and post-endovascular treatment (EVT) imaging may aid in predicting functional outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke. Low post-EVT contrast extravasation (CE)-ASPECTS is associated with poor functional outcomes. Besides the MCA regions included in the ASPECTS score, CE may be seen in the mesial temporal (MT) region. In this study, we investigated the frequency and prognostic implication of MT-CE in acute ischemic stroke patients., Methods: Patients with an acute ischemic stroke due to anterior large vessel occlusion who received EVT and post-EVT DECT between 2010 and 2019 were included. Iodine overlay maps of DECT were assessed for the occurrence of CE, using the ASPECTS for occurrence in the MCA region and, calculating a CE-ASPECTS, for whether the MT region was involved. Multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between involvement of MT-CE and 24-48h NIHSS, mRS, and mortality on a multiple imputed dataset. All models were adjusted significant variables in univariate analyses and for total CE-ASPECTS., Results: 501/651 patients met the inclusion criteria. MT-CE occurred in 97 (19 %) patients, and was more often present in patients with internal carotid artery occlusions. MT-CE was associated with higher NIHSS scores at 24-hours (aβ 2.2, 95 % CI 0.09-4.31), with increased risk of higher mRS scores (acOR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.16-3.06), and with increased risk of mortality (aOR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.16-3.86)., Conclusion: MT-CE is a common finding on post-EVT DECT and is an independent predictor for worse functional outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest W.Z reports consulting fees from Philips, and speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, and Nicolab (all paid to the institution). Moreover, he is participating in the Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of WeTrust (Philips), InEcxtremis (CHU Montpellier), ANAIS (Anaconda), and DISTAL (University of Hospital Basal) studies. A.P received an institutional grant from Siemens Healthineers and Bayer Healthcare. Other co-authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Despite literature suggesting benefits of a balloon guide catheter (BGC) in stroke thrombectomy, BGCs are not routinely used. This study aimed to get insights in the use of a BGC and the reasons (not) to inflate the balloon., Methods: Data were used of the Maastricht Stroke Quality Registry (MaSQ-Registry), a prospective registry for quality purposes of stroke patients treated between September 2020-February 2023. Additionally, a Dutch nationwide questionnaire was sent among all stroke treating physicians of the Dutch Society of Interventional Radiology (NVIR). Information on the use and reasons for selecting a (non-)BGC and using the BGC was collected., Results: Out of 511 patients registered in the MaSQ-Registry, 458 were included. In 69% (n=317) of the patients a BGC was used; in 68% (n=214) the balloon was not inflated. In 95% of the posterior circulation occlusions a non-BGC was used. In total 47 treating physicians from sixteen stroke centers responded to the questionnaire. 51% (n=24) preferred a non-BGC and 30% (n=14) never used a BGC. 52% and 18% of the BGC-users estimated they inflate the balloon in 80-100% and 0-20% of the times, respectively. The main reasons reported for not inflating the balloon were when the BGC was occlusive (47%) or not placeable (34%) in the carotid artery., Conclusion: This study shows variation in the use of (non-)BGC use with and without inflated balloon among treating physicians in the Netherlands, highlighting current limited consensus regarding the use of (non-)BGCs among stroke treating physicians., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blood brain barrier disruption (BBBD) can be visualized by contrast extravasation (CE) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Elevated blood pressure is a risk factor for BBBD. However, the association between procedural blood pressure and CE post-EVT is unknown., Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 501 eligible patients who received a dual energy CT (DECT) immediately post-EVT for acute ischemic stroke. Procedural blood pressure values (SBP mean , SBP max, SBP max-min, and MAP mean ) were collected. CE was quantified by measuring the maximum parenchymal iodine concentration on DECT iodine overlay map reconstructions. As a measure for the extent of BBBD, we created CE-ASPECTS by deducting one point per hyperdense ASPECTS region on iodine overlay maps. The association between blood pressure and CE was assessed using multivariable linear regression., Results: The procedural SBP mean , SBP max , and MAP mean were 150 ± 26 mmHg, 173 ± 29 mmHg, and 101 ± 17 mmHg, respectively. The median maximum iodine concentration on post-EVT DECT was 1.2 mg/ml (IQR 0.7-2.0), and median CE-ASPECTS was 8 (IQR 5-11). The maximum iodine concentration was not associated with blood pressure. SBP mean , SBP max, and MAP mean were significantly associated with CE-ASPECTS (per 10 mmHg, β = -0.2, 95 % CI -0.31 to -0.09, β = -0.15, 95 % CI -0.25 to -0.06, β = -0.33, 95 % CI -0.49 to -0.17, respectively)., Conclusion: In acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing EVT, particularly in patients achieving successful recanalization, SBP mean , SBP max , and MAP mean are associated with the extent of BBBD on immediate post-EVT DECT, but not with maximum iodine concentration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest W.Z reports consulting fees from Philips, and speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, and Nicolab (all paid to the institution). Moreover, he is participating in the Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of WeTrust (Philips), InEcxtremis (CHU Montpellier), ANAIS (Anaconda), and DISTAL (University of Hospital Basal) studies. A.P received an institutional grant from Siemens Healthineers and Bayer Healthcare. Other co-authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)