Search

Objective: To determine individual and delivery characteristics of women least likely to obtain a requested postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL) and, secondarily, to compare the postpartum contraceptive choices of women with an unfulfilled sterilization request to women not requesting a PPTL., Study Design: Record review ofwomen delivering a liveborn singleton between December 2007 and May 2008 at the University of Texas San Antonio. Primary outcomes were risk factors for not receiving a requested PPTL. Secondary outcome was to compare the postpartum contraceptive choices of women not receiving a PPTL to controls, women not requesting a PPTL., Results: During the observation period, 429 of 1,460 women requested a PPTL; 296 (69%) received the procedure, and 133 (31%) did not. The majority of patients (332/429, 77.4%) were Hispanic. Pretest power analysis concluded that 107 women were required in each group. Cesarean delivery was associated with the highest likelihood of receiving a PPTL. Women receiving a PPTL were more likely (p < or = 0.05) to be a documented U.S. resident, married, of lower parity, have private or any medical insurance and to have received any prenatal care. Postpartum contraception among women with unfulfilled sterilization requests was similar to that among controls., Conclusion: Although financial and policy barriers exist, the majority of patients requesting a PPTL received the procedure.

Objective: To compare micro-laparoscopic surgical sterilization and standard laparoscopic sterilization with respect to cost effectiveness and patient preferences., Study Design: A retrospective study of all laparoscopic surgical sterilizations performed under general anesthesia at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center--16 micro-laparoscopies and 34 standard laparoscopies. Cases selected for review were limited to patients undergoing surgical contraception and not requiring additional, concurrent procedures. Laparoscopic surgical sterilization was performed using a double-puncture technique with silicone band application. In each case either a standard, 10-mm laparoscope or a 2-mm micro-laparoscope was used, and the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. Postoperative pain management was achieved by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and/or narcotic analgesia. All cases were performed by residents under faculty supervision. Medical records and hospital billing records were reviewed, and a standardized telephone interview was conducted to assess postoperative quality of life and patient satisfaction., Results: Both techniques were comparable in cost effectiveness. There was no significant difference in operating room time, average operating room costs, average ancillary department costs, instrument and supply costs, or length of stay. Postoperative discomfort was significantly less with microlaparoscopy (P = .05), and patient satisfaction was higher in the microlaparoscopy group., Conclusion: Microlaparoscopy and the standard laparoscopic approach for surgical sterilization are associated with similar hospital charges. Postoperative pain and overall patient satisfaction were significantly better with microlaparoscopy than standard laparoscopy.

The objective of this analysis was to evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of eight contraceptive methods: condoms, diaphragms, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, medroxyprogesterone acetate suspension, levonorgestrel subdermal implants, tubal ligation and vasectomy. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature and various additional data sources, this analysis identified, measured and compared direct costs of the methods, physician visits, treatment of adverse effects and cost of failure (i.e., mean cost for all types of deliveries or first-trimester abortion). Medical benefits (if any) resulting from each contraceptive method were calculated and considered in the analysis as cost savings. The cost of method failure proved to be the greatest influence on cost-effectiveness. Sterilization was identified as the most cost-effective method overall. Of the reversible methods, the intrauterine device was found to be the most cost-effective, followed by levonorgestrel implants.

In 1981 the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and the Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control, jointly conducted a study of tubal sterilizations performed in 141 freestanding, ambulatory-care surgical facilities in 1980 in the United States. Information was collected through mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews. Of 330 potential responding facilities, 141 we identified as freestanding, ambulatory-care surgical facilities. About 16,500 tubal sterilizations were performed in these facilities in 1980. The mean number of tubal sterilizations per freestanding, ambulatory-care surgical facility was 212. Sixty-seven percent of tubal sterilizations were performed in the south and west. General anesthesia was the anesthetic method used in 97% of the procedures. Nearly 91% of tubal sterilizations were done via laparoscopy, with bipolar electrocoagulation the tubal-occlusion method used most frequently. After tubal sterilization the patients were observed for an average of 2.4 hours before discharge. The average cost of laparoscopic tubal sterilization was $801; for nonlaparoscopic tubal sterilization it was $850.