Search

Introduction The Surgical Safety Checklist implemented by the World Health Organization has proven to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality; however, the barriers and limitations to its implementation are consistently reported in the literature. Objective To establish the level of appropriation of the surgical safety checklist in the training of human resources in anesthesiology, in addition to identifying the perception and the level of implementation of such checklist at the national scale. Methods Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted through a survey administered to the residents of anesthesiology in Colombia. Likert-type questions were included, distributed into three domains: appropriation, perception and implementation. Results 215 answers corresponding to 54.5 % of the population were analyzed, comprising participants from all of the anesthesiology programs in the country. 20% of the residents have never been subject to formal academic reviews about checklists, and this trend did not change throughout the residency; 97.2 % considers that the implementation of the lists improves the safety of surgical procedures and 40 % have seen rejection or indifference by surgeons. 80.5 % of the residents have seen the frequent use of the checklist, while only 13.5% have seen the use of the checklist during the three surgical moments - before the induction of anesthesia, before the surgical incision, and before the patient leaves the operating room 88 % have observed that the form is completed without actually doing the verification. Conclusions There is limited exposure to education about the surgical safety checklist in anesthesiology postgraduate programs in the country. The residents have a favorable perception about the value of the list, however, there are some shortcomings in its administration. Resumen Introducción: La lista de verificación de cirugía segura implementada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud ha demostrado disminuir la morbimortalidad perioperatoria; no obstante, en la literatura se reportan de manera sistemática las barreras y limitaciones en su aplicación. Objetivo: Establecer el grado de apropiación de la lista de verificación de cirugía segura en la formación del talento humano en anestesiología en entrenamiento, así como determinar la percepción y el nivel de implementación de dicha lista a escala nacional. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal realizado mediante una encuesta a los residentes de anestesiología en Colombia. Se incluyeron preguntas tipo Likert distribuidas en 3 dominios: apropiación, percepción e implementación. Resultados: Se analizaron 215 respuestas correspondiente a un 54,5 % de la población y se contó con la participación de todos los programas de anestesiología del país. El 20 % de los residentes nunca ha tenido revisiones académicas formales sobre listas de verificación y esta tendencia no se modificó a lo largo de la residencia, el 97,2 % considera que la implementación de las listas incrementa la seguridad de los procedimientos quirúrgicos y el 40 % ha observado rechazo o indiferencia por parte de los cirujanos. El 80,5 % de los residentes ha observado su aplicación frecuente, solo el 13,5 % ha observado aplicar la lista en los tres momentos (antes de la inducción anestésica, antes de la incisión quirúrgica, antes de la salida del paciente del quirófano) y el 88 % ha observado diligenciar el formato sin realizar la verificación. Conclusiones: Existe poca exposición a la enseñanza de la lista de verificación de cirugía segura en los posgrados de anestesiología del país. Los residentes tienen una percepción favorable sobre la utilidad de la lista; sin embargo, su implementación tiene falencias en cuanto a la forma de aplicación.

attempts to find a response tothe use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 6% in surgical patientsand its possible connection with an increase in mortality at30 days (primary outcome), the appearance of acute kidneyinjury (AKI) and the need for dialytic support. These aspectsare associated with patients in intensive care, especially withsepsis. To do this, they designed a systematic review of litera-ture since 1946, choosing those essays that compared HES 6%with otherresuscitationsolutions.Finally,theselected19ran-domized clinical studies, obtaining 1567 patients with whomthey carried out a meta-analysis.No differences were found in surgical patients or in mor-tality betweentheuseofHES6%andofothertypesoffluidsinterms of mortality — RD 0.00, CI 95%: 0.02–0.02 — or the need