Search

The use of premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is not widely established in western countries. The primary aim was to compare gastric visibility according to the total visibility score (TVS). As secondary aim to assess complications, diagnostic yield, endoscopic procedure time, sedation dose and patient' satisfaction.Single center prospective cohort study including consecutive adults undergoing an UGE in the afternoon working shift. After completing enrolment in the control group, patients were administered 200 mg simethicone and 500 mg N-acetylcysteine diluted in 100 ml of water15 minutes before the procedure. All procedures were recorded and a single, blinded endoscopist evaluated the TVS after recruitment of both cohorts. Patient' satisfaction was evaluated using the Spanish translation of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire.205 patients were included, 103 females (50.2%) with a median age of 54.8-years (IQR: 41.2-65.2). 104 were enrolled to the control group and 101 to the intervention group. Patients receiving premedication presented a higher rate of adequate gastric visibility (74.3% vs 45.2; difference 95% CI: 16,3-41,9%, p0.001) and excellent (23.8% vs 7.7%; difference 95% CI: 6,3-25,8%, p=0.002). Propofol dose was similar, although median procedure time was lower in the group of no intervention [5 (IQR: 4-7) vs 6 minutes (IQR: 5-7); p=0.03]. Procedure related adverse events were similar, except that patient without premedication experienced more nausea episodes. Major and minor endoscopic findings and the satisfaction questionnaire showed no differences between both groups.Patients receiving premedication with simethicone and N-acetylcysteine presented a better gastric visibility score, without increase in adverse events or affecting the patients' satisfaction.

We present the case of a 71-years-old male with a history of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with palliative treatment. He was admitted to our hospital with hematochezia and anemia (Hemoglobin 10.6 g/dl).

We appreciate the interest of Sánchez-Luna et al. in our article "Endoscopic internal drainage using transmural double-pigtail stents in leaks following upper gastrointestinal tract surgery", and find their suggestion about using softer urological double pigtail stents (DPS) for endoscopic internal drainage (EID) interesting.

INTRODUCTION different endoscopic procedures have been proposed for the management of surgical leaks. Endoscopic internal drainage using trans-fistulary double-pigtail plastic stents has emerged as an alternative strategy, especially in fistulae presenting after laparoscopic gastric sleeve. METHODS a retrospective case series was performed at a single tertiary care center including all upper gastrointestinal post-surgical leaks primarily managed with endoscopic trans-fistulary insertion of double-pigtail plastic stents. Clinical success was defined as the absence of extravasation of oral radiographic contrast and radiological resolution of the collection with adequate oral intake Results: nine patients were included, six (66.6 %) females with a median age of 52.6 years (IQR 47-60). Five cases presented after laparoscopic gastric sleeve, two cases after distal esophagectomies, one after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and another one after a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Fistulae measured < 10 mm in five patients (55.6 %) and 10-20 mm in four patients (44.4 %). Six were early leaks. Technical and clinical success was achieved in nine (100 %) and seven (77.8 %) cases, respectively. Seven (77.8 %) patients required ≤ 3 endoscopic procedures. The median hospital stay after the first endoscopic procedure was 12 days (IQR 6.5-17.5 days), while the overall median time until leak healing was 118.5 days (IQR 84.5-170). One patient with a post-esophagectomy intrathoracic leak developed an esophageal-tracheal fistula 37 days after stent deployment. CONCLUSIONS our results support the use of endoscopic internal drainage in postsurgical abdominal leaks, regardless of the type of surgery. Although only two patients with intrathoracic dehiscence were included.