Search

Objective: To assess the impact of COVID-19 at nine nursing homes in Madrid, Spain, during the first wave of COVID-19 infection and lockdown period when preventive measures were taken to avoid transmission among residents., Methods: Nine hundred forty-two residents and 846 staff members from nine nursing homes participated in the study (April 18 to June 20, 2020). All participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 in the nasopharynx by PCR and for IgG antibodies detection. Microbiological status at sampling was defined as active infection (positive PCR ± presence of antibodies), past infection (negative PCR + presence of antibodies), or naïve participants (negative PCR + absence of antibodies)., Results: Laboratory results helped classify the residents as having active infection (n=224; 23.8%), past infection (n=462; 49.1%), or being naïve (n=256; 27.1%); staff members were actively infected (n=127; 15.1%), had had a past infection (n=290; 34.2%), or were naïve (n=429; 50.7%). Overall, the percentage of participants with COVID-19 was significantly higher in residents than in staff members (72.8% vs 49.2%; P=0.001). The clinical situation of residents vs staff at sampling was as follows: acute manifestations compatible with COVID-19 (7.3% vs 3.9%; P<0.01) and no manifestations of infection (92.7% vs 96.0%; P<0.01). A large proportion of both asymptomatic and symptomatic residents (69.4% vs 86.6%; P=0.015) had positive PCR results (mostly alongside positive IgG determinations)., Conclusions: COVID-19 affects 75% of the residents in nursing homes in Madrid. The high impact in these settings, despite the strict restrictions adopted during the lockdown, demonstrates the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to cause outbreaks., (©The Author 2022. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).)

Objective: Following the approval of bezlotoxumab in 2017, studies evaluating its effectiveness in prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection under "real-life" conditions are scarce., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study developed in a large tertiary care hospital describing the use and outcomes of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treated with bezlotoxumab., Results: A total of 16 patients were include, all of whom had an episode of CDI with high probability of recurrence and 14 of them had some kind of immunosuppression. Bezlotoxumab was effective in the prevention of CDI recurrence in 11 of the 14 cases in which follow up was possible, without significant side effects., Conclusions: Bezlotoxumab was well tolerated and the incidence of recurrent CDI in a high-risk population for recurrence was only 21.4%., (©The Author 2022. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).)

This document gathers the opinion of a multidisciplinary forum of experts on different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Spain. It has been structured around a series of questions that the attendees considered relevant and in which a consensus opinion was reached. The main messages were as follows: CDI should be suspected in patients older than 2 years of age in the presence of diarrhea, paralytic ileus and unexplained leukocytosis, even in the absence of classical risk factors. With a few exceptions, a single stool sample is sufficient for diagnosis, which can be sent to the laboratory with or without transportation media for enteropathogenic bacteria. In the absence of diarrhoea, rectal swabs may be valid. The microbiology laboratory should include C. difficile among the pathogens routinely searched in patients with diarrhoea. Laboratory tests in different order and sequence schemes include GDH detection, presence of toxins, molecular tests and toxigenic culture. Immediate determination of sensitivity to drugs such as vancomycin, metronidazole or fidaxomycin is not required. The evolution of toxin persistence is not a suitable test for follow up. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI should be rapid and results reported and interpreted to clinicians immediately. In addition to the basic support of all diarrheic episodes, CDI treatment requires the suppression of antiperistaltic agents, proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics, where possible. Oral vancomycin and fidaxomycin are the antibacterials of choice in treatment, intravenous metronidazole being restricted for patients in whom the presence of the above drugs in the intestinal lumen cannot be assured. Fecal material transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple recurrences but uncertainties persist regarding its standardization and safety. Bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody to C. difficile toxin B that should be administered to patients at high risk of recurrence. Surgery is becoming less and less necessary and prevention with vaccines is under research. Probiotics have so far not been shown to be therapeutically or preventively effective. The therapeutic strategy should be based, rather than on the number of episodes, on the severity of the episodes and on their potential to recur. Some data point to the efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis in patients who reccur CDI when systemic antibiotics are required again., (©The Author 2020. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).)

Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) is an ongoing global antimicrobial surveillance program focused on clinical isolates from intra-abdominal infections (IAI). The objective of this subanalysis was to assess the evolution of the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among aerobic and facultative gram-negative bacilli (GNB) recovered over a 5-year period at our institution. We tested the in vitro activity of the antimicrobials, commonly used to treat IAI, against consecutive unique isolates from IAI using microdilution techniques according to the CLSI guidelines for MIC testing. All isolates were screened phenotypically for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production. Isolates recovered within 48 h of hospitalization were considered community-acquired (CA). Over the study period a total of 572 aerobic and facultative gram-negative bacilli were recovered from 510 patients, of which 258 (45%) were CA. Enterobacteriaceae composed 91% of the total isolates. Escherichia coli was the most common isolated species (52%). Susceptibility rates of Enterobacteriaceae ranged from 96.5 %-100 % to ertapenem, 96.5 %-100 % to imipenem, 87.7%-94.3% to piperacillin-tazobactam, 85.1%-94.3% to cefotaxime, 89.5%-100% to cefepime, 76.3%-84.8% to ciprofloxacin, and 93.8%-100% to amikacin. ESBL were detected in 6.3% of E. coli, 5.7% of Klebsiella spp. and 2.7% of Enterobacter spp. ESBL producers generally had a more antibiotic- resistant profile than non-ESBL producers and 16% of them were CA. Susceptibility rates to ertapenem, imipenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin and amikacin were, respectively, for P. aeruginosa: 28.2 %, 58.9%, 82%, 84.6 %, 76.9 %, 71.8% and 82%; for Acinetobacter baumannii: 33.3 %, 100 %, 66.6 %, 66.6 %, 66.6%, 66.6% y 66.6%, and for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: 0%, 0%, 0%, 28.6%, 0%, 42.9% and 14.3%. Over the 5 year-study period we have not observed significant increases in resistance of aerobic and facultative GNB causing IAI to commonly used beta-lactam antimicrobial drugs. A minority of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were CA. Carbapenems, including group I agents like ertapenem, were the most reliably active drugs in vitro against isolates producing IAI.

We compared the antimicrobial co-resistance of 3,402 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (2,569 ESBL-producing and 833 AmpC overproducing) with that of 16,220 susceptible isolates, in order to determine the impact of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins on the likelihood of resistance to other antimicrobial classes. Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, independently of their mechanism of resistance, were significantly more resistant to other classes of antimicrobials than susceptible isolates (p <0.001). Percentages of co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole of resistant isolates were: 51%, 39%, 53% and 51%, respectively. However, among the susceptible isolates, percentages were 17%, 7%, 6% and 19%, respectively. Fosfomycin exhibited excellent in vitro activity against urinary isolates (92%), mainly against ESBL-producing organisms (90%), and is a good alternative treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Amikacin and imipenem were the most active antimicrobials against all species tested.