1. [Update 2017 of the KDIGO guidelines on Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). What are the real changes?]
- Author
-
Pasquali M, Bellasi A, Cianciolo G, Massimetti C, Mereu MC, Morrone L, and Panuccio V
- Subjects
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones adverse effects, Biopsy, Bone Demineralization, Pathologic etiology, Bone Demineralization, Pathologic physiopathology, Bone Demineralization, Pathologic therapy, Bone Density, Bone Density Conservation Agents therapeutic use, Bone Resorption etiology, Bone Resorption prevention & control, Bone and Bones pathology, Calcium analysis, Contraindications, Drug, Dialysis Solutions chemistry, Humans, Hypercalcemia etiology, Hypercalcemia prevention & control, Hypercalcemia therapy, Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary drug therapy, Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary etiology, Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary physiopathology, Hyperphosphatemia diet therapy, Hyperphosphatemia drug therapy, Hyperphosphatemia etiology, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic complications, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic metabolism, Vitamin D therapeutic use, Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder diagnostic imaging, Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder physiopathology, Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder therapy
- Abstract
Guidelines for the assessment, diagnosis and therapy of the alterations that characterize the CKD-MBD are an important support in the clinical practice of the nephrologist. Compared to the KDIGO guidelines published in 2009, the 2017 update made changes on some topics on which there was previously no strong evidence both in terms of diagnosis and therapy. The recommendations include the diagnosis of bone anomalies in CKD-MBD and the treatment of mineral metabolism abnormalities with particular regard to hyperphosphataemia, calcium levels, secondary hyperparathyroidism and anti-resorptive therapies. The Italian Study Group on Mineral Metabolism, in reviewing the 2017 recommendations, aimed to assess the weight of the evidence that led to this update. In fact, on some topics there has not been a substantial difference on the degree of evidence compared to the previous guidelines. The Italian Study Group emphasizes the points that may still reserve critical issues, including interpretation, and invites an evaluation that is articulated and personalized for each patient., (Copyright by Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN, Rome, Italy.)
- Published
- 2018