Search

Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), derived from quantitative measurements of myocardial blood flow during PET imaging, provides prognostic information on patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but it is not known if this also applies to cancer patients with a competing risk for mortality. Methods: To determine the prognostic value of MFR in patients with cancer, we designed a retrospective cohort study comprising 221 patients with known or suspected CAD (median age, 71 y; range, 41-92 y) enrolled between June 2009 and January 2011. Most patients were referred for perioperative risk assessment. Patients underwent measurement of myocardial blood flow at rest and during pharmacologic stress, using quantitative 82 Rb PET imaging. They were divided into early-stage versus advanced-stage cancer groups based on cancer histopathology and clinical state and were further stratified by myocardial perfusion summed stress score, summed difference score, and calculated MFR. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and Cox proportional-hazards regression helped identify independent predictors for OS. Results: During a follow-up of 85.6 mo, 120 deaths occurred. MFR, summed difference score, and cancer stage were significantly associated with OS. In the age-adjusted Cox hazard multivariable analysis, MFR and cancer stage remained independent prognostic factors. MFR combined with cancer stage enhanced OS discrimination. The groups had significantly different outcomes ( P < 0.001), with 5-y OS of 88% (MFR ≥ 1.97 and early-stage), 53% (MFR < 1.97 and early-stage), 33% (MFR ≥ 1.97 and advanced-stage), and 13% (MFR < 1.97 and advanced-stage). Conclusion: Independent of cancer stage, MFR derived from quantitative PET was prognostic of OS in our cohort of cancer patients with known or suspected CAD. Combining these 2 parameters enhanced discrimination of OS, suggesting that MFR improves risk stratification and may serve as a treatment target to increase survival in cancer patients., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

This study evaluated the safety, dosimetry, and characteristics of 3-((2-fluoro-4-(5-(2'-methyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)benzyl)(methyl- 11 C)amino)propanoic acid ( 11 C-CS1P1), a radiotracer targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) 1 (S1PR1). S1PR1 is of clinical interest because of its role in multiple sclerosis (and other conditions), with an expanding class of S1PR modulators approved for relapsing multiple sclerosis. 11 C-CS1P1 binds S1PR1 with high specificity and has shown promise in animal models of inflammatory diseases. Methods: 11 C-CS1P1 was injected into 5 male and 6 female healthy participants. Ten participants were imaged with PET using a multipass whole-body continuous-bed-motion acquisition, and one had dedicated head and neck PET and MRI. Participants were continuously monitored for safety events. Organ time-activity curve data were collected, integrated, and normalized to the injected activity. Organ radiation doses and effective dose were computed using the adult male and female models in OLINDA, version 2.2. SUV images were evaluated for qualitative biodistribution. Results: No adverse events were observed after the dose, including no bradycardia. The liver was the critical organ from dosimetry analysis (mean ± SD: female, 23.12 ± 5.19 μSv/MBq; male, 21.06 ± 1.63 μSv/MBq). The whole-body effective dose (as defined by International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103) was 4.18 ± 0.30 μSv/MBq in women and 3.54 ± 0.14 μSv/MBq in men. Using a maximum delivered dose of 740 MBq (20 mCi), the effective dose for women would be 3.1 mSv (0.31 rem), with a liver dose of 17.1 mSv (1.7 rem); the effective dose for men would be 2.6 mSv (0.26 rem), with a liver dose of 15.6 mSv (1.56 rem). Brain uptake was seen predominantly in gray matter and correlated with regional S1PR1 RNA expression ( r = 0.84). Conclusion: These results support the safety of 11 C-CS1P1 for evaluation of inflammation in human clinical populations. Dosimetry permits repeated measures in the same participants. Brain uptake correlates well with known target topography., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

We assessed image quality using a practical and time-efficient protocol for intravenous glucose loading and insulin injection before administration of 18 F-FDG for PET myocardial viability evaluation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: The metabolic preparation period (MPP) or optimal cardiac 18 F-FDG uptake was determined from the time of intravenous infusion of 12.5 or 25 g of 50% dextrose to the time of 18 F-FDG injection. Cardiac 18 F-FDG image quality was evaluated according to a 5-point scoring system (from 5, excellent, to 1, nondiagnostic) by 2 independent observers. In cases of disagreement, consensus was achieved in a joint reading. Fifteen patients with ICM who underwent oral glucose loading and intravenous insulin administration served as a reference for MPP comparisons. Results: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (age, 63 ± 10 y; 48 men and 11 women) underwent rest 99m Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of myocardial viability. 18 F-FDG image quality was scored as excellent in 42%, very good in 36%, good in 17%, fair in 3%, and nondiagnostic in 2%. When diabetic and nondiabetic patients were compared, the quality scores were excellent in 29% versus 76%, very good in 41% versus 18%, good in 24% versus 6%, fair in 4% versus 0%, and nondiagnostic in 2% versus 0%. The mean (±SD) quality score was 4.12 ± 0.95, and overall it was better in nondiabetic than in diabetic patients (4.71 ± 0.59 vs. 3.88 ± 0.96; P < 0.0001). Notably, the average MPP was significantly less with intravenous glucose loading than with oral glucose loading (51 ± 15 min vs. 132 ± 29 min; P < 0.0001), paralleled by higher insulin doses (6.3 ± 2.2 U vs. 2.0 ± 1.69 U; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Using a practical and time-efficient protocol for intravenous glucose loading and insulin administration before 18 F-FDG injection reduces the MPP by 61% as compared with an oral glucose challenge and affords good-to-excellent image quality in 95% of ICM patients., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)